Jump to content

Asbestos Podcast EP15 Transcript

From WikiMesothelioma — Mesothelioma Knowledge Base


Episode 15: The Body Count Begins

Full transcript from Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — a 52-episode documentary podcast produced by Danziger & De Llano, LLP.

Episode Information
Series Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making
Season 1
Episode 15
Title The Body Count Begins
Arc Arc 4 — The Warnings Ignored (Episode 1 of 5, Arc Premiere)
Produced by Charles Fletcher
Listen Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Amazon Music

Episode Summary

Episode 15 traces the emergence of documented evidence regarding asbestos hazards between 1898 and 1914, focusing on four primary investigations (Britain, France, Italy, Germany) that revealed the asbestos disease pattern despite regulatory inaction. The episode emphasizes Lucy Deane's pioneering identification of both asbestos fiber hazards and the survivorship bias mechanism that protected industry from liability. Thomas Legge's 31-year failure to act on documented evidence is positioned as the paradigm of "passive negligence" - systemic regulatory failure that did not require active conspiracy.

Full Episode Transcript

COLD OPEN

HOST 1: Eighteen ninety. A small town in Normandy, France. A man named Paul Fleury has an idea. He's been running a cotton mill in Gonneville, but cotton is dying. Cheaper production in the east. So he opens a new factory, fifty kilometers away. Different fiber. Same machines.

HOST 2: He recruited his own workers.

HOST 1: Seventeen of them. People who knew him. People who trusted him. Women, mostly. The French textile workforce was predominantly female. Ninety-two thousand women versus seventy-five thousand men in the cotton trade. These seventeen knew how to card fibers, how to run the spinning frames. Fleury told them the work was the same. Just a different material.

HOST 2: Asbestos.

HOST 1: Over the years that followed, sixteen of those seventeen workers were dead.

HOST 2: Sixteen out of seventeen.

HOST 1: Ninety-four percent. Nobody investigated. Nobody was charged. A factory inspector wouldn't even document the deaths for another sixteen years. Welcome to Arc Four. The Warnings Ignored. This is Episode Fifteen: The Body Count Begins.

HOST 2: Asbestos: A Conspiracy Four Thousand Five Hundred Years in the Making is brought to you by Danziger & De Llano, a nationwide mesothelioma law firm with over thirty years of experience and nearly two billion dollars recovered for asbestos victims. If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, they offer free consultations and only get paid if you win. Visit dandell.com.

SEGMENT 1: ARC THREE REVIEW - THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

HOST 1: Before we go forward, let's look back. We just finished Arc Three. The Industrial Revolution. Five episodes.

HOST 2: What did we learn?

HOST 1: We learned what the industry counted and what it didn't. Quebec measured asbestos recovery rates to the tenth of a pound. Could tell shareholders exactly how much rock produced exactly how much fiber. But couldn't tell a single worker whether the dust was destroying his lungs.

HOST 2: They tracked the product. Not the people.

HOST 1: Coal mining had mandatory death reporting from eighteen fifty. Over a hundred sixty-four thousand individual accident records. With names. The fatal accident rate in coal and asbestos was identical. One point six seven deaths per thousand workers. Coal got a database. Asbestos got a void.

KEY FACTS:

  • Coal mining death reporting: Mandatory from 1850
  • Total coal mining accident records: 164,000+
  • Fatal accident rate (coal): 1.67 per 1,000 workers
  • Fatal accident rate (asbestos): 1.67 per 1,000 workers
  • Asbestos tracking: No mandatory reporting or centralized database

HOST 2: And the people who fell through that void.

HOST 1: Nellie Kershaw. Started carding asbestos at twelve. Dead at thirty-three. The company's response: "Asbestos is not poisonous." Doctor Murray's patient. The only survivor of ten in his carding room. Murray's response to Parliament: "I have no evidence except his word." Nobody checked. Nobody went looking.

HOST 2: Arc Three was about the absence.

HOST 1: The absence. Who wasn't counted. Why they weren't counted. And what that silence bought the industry. Decades of plausible deniability. No records means no pattern. No pattern means no proof.

HOST 2: But some people did count.

HOST 1: Some people counted. And that's where Arc Four begins. The Warnings Ignored. Over the next several episodes, we're going to trace what happened when the evidence started piling up. Medical reports. Government inquiries. Insurance data. Case after case after case. And we're going to watch an industry learn how to make sure none of it mattered.

HOST 2: So where does the counting start?

HOST 1: With a woman who'd already seen the worst that industry could do to a human body. Lucy Anne Evelyn Deane. Born eighteen sixty-five. Madras, India.

SEGMENT 2: LUCY ANNE EVELYN DEANE - BACKGROUND AND EARLY CAREER

NAMED ENTITY - LUCY ANNE EVELYN DEANE:

  • Full name: Lucy Anne Evelyn Deane
  • Birth year: 1865
  • Birthplace: Madras, India
  • Father: Lieutenant-Colonel Bonar Millett Deane (British Army officer)
  • Mother: The Honourable Lucy Boscawen
  • Mother's family: Sister of Evelyn Boscawen, Sixth Viscount Falmouth (House of Lords)
  • Social status: British aristocracy, upper class
  • Parental deaths: Both deceased by 1886
  • Age at orphaning: 21 years old
  • Inheritance status: Well-connected but without family income
  • Training: National Health Society (enrolled 1890)
  • Certification: Nursing sister; Sanitary inspector's qualification (1893)
  • Appointment: British factory inspector (1894)
  • Team membership: One of four female factory inspectors
  • Legal authority: Full powers of inspection, enforcement, and prosecution
  • Service duration: Pioneering role in British occupational health regulation
  • Significance: First to document asbestos fiber hazards using microscopic analysis

HOST 2: India.

HOST 1: Daughter of the British Raj. Her father was Lieutenant-Colonel Bonar Millett Deane. Army officer. Her mother was the Honourable Lucy Boscawen, sister of Evelyn Boscawen, Sixth Viscount Falmouth. Seats in the House of Lords. This is the edge of the aristocracy.

HOST 2: So how does she end up in factories?

HOST 1: By eighteen eighty-six, both parents are dead. She's twenty-one. An orphan of the upper classes. Well-connected enough to open doors, but with no inheritance to live on.

HOST 2: She needed a purpose.

HOST 1: She found one. Eighteen ninety, she enrolled with the National Health Society. Trained as a nursing sister. Earned her sanitary inspector's qualification in eighteen ninety-three. And then she met a woman named May Abraham.

HOST 2: Who's May Abraham?

HOST 1: Britain's first female factory inspector. Appointed by Home Secretary Herbert Asquith in eighteen ninety-three. When the team expanded from two inspectors to four the following year, Lucy Deane joined.

KEY FACTS - BRITISH FEMALE FACTORY INSPECTORS:

  • First appointment: May Abraham (1893)
  • Appointing official: Herbert Asquith (Home Secretary)
  • Initial team: 2 female inspectors
  • Team expansion: 1894 (expanded to 4 inspectors)
  • New member: Lucy Deane
  • Comparison: 15 male assistant inspectors appointed same year
  • Female inspector authority: Full powers of inspection, enforcement, and prosecution
  • Male inspector authority: Information gathering only
  • Pay differential: Female inspectors received less pay despite greater authority
  • Institutional response: Male colleagues expressed doubt about women's "competence and suitability"

HOST 2: Four women inspecting all the factories in Britain.

HOST 1: And here's what nobody expected. Those four women received full powers of inspection, enforcement, and prosecution immediately upon appointment. More authority than the fifteen male assistant inspectors hired the same year, who could only gather information.

HOST 2: The women had more power than the men.

HOST 1: More legal power. Less pay. And open hostility from male colleagues who, quote, "already doubted their competence and suitability for the role."

HOST 2: Of course they did.

HOST 1: Deane traveled alone. Stayed in unpleasant hotels. And within months, she'd personally identified eight prosecution cases against firms violating the Factory Acts. She stood up in court herself, stated the facts, called witnesses. A woman acting as prosecutor in an era when women had no place in the legal profession. That's who Lucy Deane was before asbestos.

SEGMENT 3: LUCY DEANE'S EXPERIENCE WITH OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS

HOST 2: What had she seen before the asbestos factories?

HOST 1: The dangerous trades. White lead works. Women called "bed workers" stacking lead cakes with bare hands. Blue lines forming around their gums. The first sign lead was in their bodies. Then headaches. Anaemia. Blindness. A condition called wrist drop, a partial paralysis of the hand.

OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE - WHITE LEAD POISONING:

  • Industry: Lead works/white lead manufacturing
  • Worker category: "Bed workers"
  • Method of handling: Bare hands, no protective equipment
  • Primary symptom: Blue line around gums (lead line) - earliest visible indicator
  • Progressive symptoms: Headaches, anaemia, vision loss, blindness
  • Specific neurological condition: Wrist drop (partial paralysis of hand)
  • Occupational classification: Chronic lead poisoning
  • Status in Deane's era: Well-documented occupational disease

HOST 2: And match factories.

HOST 1: Bryant and May. Fourteen-hour days. White phosphorus vapors. Phossy jaw. The jawbone literally rotting. Turning green and black. Spreading to the brain. Nearly one in five workers died of it.

OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE - PHOSPHORUS NECROSIS (PHOSSY JAW):

  • Industry: Match manufacturing (Bryant and May)
  • Working conditions: 14-hour work days
  • Primary hazard: White phosphorus vapor exposure
  • Resulting disease: Phossy jaw (phosphorus necrosis of mandible)
  • Pathophysiology: Jawbone necrosis and decay
  • Visual progression: Discoloration green to black; bone degeneration
  • Disease progression: Can spread to brain tissue
  • Mortality rate: ~20% (nearly 1 in 5 workers)
  • Time period observed: 1882-1897 at Bryant and May
  • Status: Severe, frequently fatal occupational disease

HOST 2: That's the woman who walked into an asbestos factory.

HOST 1: In eighteen ninety-eight. And she saw something that the workers themselves couldn't see. She arranged for the Medical Inspector of Factories, a man named Thomas Legge, to examine the dust under a microscope. Legge was the first Medical Inspector of Factories. Appointed that same year. And what he saw under the lens confirmed what Deane already suspected.

HOST 2: The fibers.

HOST 1: Mineral. Rigid. Nothing like cotton or hemp. Quote: "Where they are allowed to rise and remain suspended in the air in any quantity, the effects have been found to be injurious, as might have been expected."

NAMED ENTITY - THOMAS LEGGE:

  • Title: Medical Inspector of Factories (Britain)
  • Appointment year: 1898 (first person to hold this position)
  • Collaboration with Lucy Deane: 1898 microscopic analysis of asbestos dust
  • Microscopic finding: Mineral composition; rigid structure; jagged appearance
  • Assessment: Fibers "injurious, as might have been expected"
  • Service duration: Nearly 30 years
  • Key committee participation: Departmental Committee on Compensation for Industrial Diseases (1906)
  • Honors: Knighted 1925 (Sir Thomas Legge)

HOST 2: "As might have been expected."

HOST 1: Of course they're dangerous. Look at them. And Deane didn't stop at the microscope. In the same report, she identified something that epidemiologists wouldn't formally name for another fifty years.

HOST 2: What's that?

HOST 1: The healthy survivor fallacy. Quote: "There is always a certain proportion of 'old workers,' the survivors of their mates, who are found in every unhealthy industry and who appear to thrive on their unhealthy calling."

KEY CONCEPT - HEALTHY SURVIVOR FALLACY (SURVIVORSHIP BIAS):

  • Year identified: 1898 (Lucy Deane, asbestos context)
  • Formal epidemiological naming: Approximately 1950s
  • Definition: Statistical bias resulting from observation of only surviving members of hazardous occupations
  • Mechanism: Workers who die, become disabled, or leave industry are excluded from observed population
  • Industrial application: Factory owners highlighted "old workers" who survived to claim workplace safety
  • What it obscured: Workers who died, became ill, or left employment due to workplace hazards
  • Significance in asbestos: Used systematically to deny asbestos hazards despite high mortality
  • Deane's articulation: Published in government report, 50 years before formal naming in epidemiology

HOST 2: Survivorship bias. In eighteen ninety-eight.

HOST 1: Factory owners would point to the old workers who'd survived and say, "See? The work is safe." While ignoring all the ones who died. She saw the trick. And she published it. Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Factories. Eighteen ninety-nine. Pages one seventy-one to one seventy-two. Submitted to Parliament.

PUBLICATION - LUCY DEANE'S ASBESTOS FINDINGS:

  • Document: Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Factories
  • Year: 1899
  • Pages: 171-172
  • Author: Lucy Deane
  • Content: Asbestos fiber hazard analysis; healthy survivor fallacy identification
  • Distribution: Submitted to Parliament (UK legislative body)
  • Classification: Official government occupational health report

HOST 2: And?

HOST 1: Filed.

SEGMENT 4: MID-EPISODE SPONSORSHIP

HOST 2: Reports filed and forgotten. We keep hearing that phrase. And if you're facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, you deserve someone who won't let your case get filed away. Danziger & De Llano. Thirty years fighting for asbestos victims. Dandell dot com.

SEGMENT 5: THE NORMANDY FACTORY CASE - PAUL FLEURY

HOST 1: Now. Last episode, we told you about fifty deaths at a factory in Normandy. What we didn't tell you is how it started. Those seventeen workers Fleury recruited from Gonneville. Women who'd been carding cotton. Who understood the machines. Who were told asbestos was simply a different fiber.

HOST 2: Same machines. Different material.

HOST 1: Except cotton dust is soft. Organic. It settles. Asbestos fibers are mineral. Rigid. Glass-like and jagged, to borrow Deane's description. Every rotation of those carding machines shattered the fibers into particles so fine they were invisible.

NAMED ENTITY - PAUL FLEURY ASBESTOS FACTORY:

  • Owner: Paul Fleury
  • Previous business: Cotton mill in Gonneville, Normandy
  • New factory location: Normandy, France (50 km from Gonneville)
  • Establishment year: ~1890
  • Workers recruited: 17 (all women, experienced cotton carders)
  • Worker origin: Gonneville cotton mill (Paul Fleury's previous employment)
  • Worker classification: Experienced textile workers, familiar with carding machinery
  • Representation to workers: "Same work, different fiber"
  • Material substitution: Cotton fiber replaced with asbestos fiber
  • Equipment: Same carding machines used in cotton production
  • Key difference: Asbestos particles are mineral, rigid, glass-like vs. organic cotton dust
  • Physical mechanism: Rotating carding machine rotation shatters asbestos fibers into fine, invisible particles
  • Occupational hazard: Continuous inhalation of fine asbestos particles without filtration, masks, or ventilation

HOST 2: How fast did it kill them?

HOST 1: Sixteen dead. The seventeenth worker disappears from the historical record. We don't know if she survived or simply wasn't counted. In nineteen oh six, a factory inspector named Denis Auribault finally investigated. He documented fifty total deaths at that factory between eighteen ninety and nineteen oh six.

NAMED ENTITY - DENIS AURIBAULT INVESTIGATION:

  • Investigator: Denis Auribault
  • Title: Factory inspector
  • Jurisdiction: Normandy, France
  • Investigation year: 1906
  • Facility investigated: Fleury's asbestos factory, Normandy, France
  • Time period covered: 1890-1906 (16 years of operation)
  • Total deaths documented: 50
  • Initial worker cohort: 17 women from Gonneville cotton mill
  • Mortality in initial cohort: 16 of 17 dead (94%)
  • Seventeenth worker status: Unknown (disappeared from records)
  • Report status: Filed without regulatory action or follow-up
  • Historical designation: "Dead letter" (administrative term for filed and forgotten)

HOST 2: Fifty.

HOST 1: But here's the thing. Auribault made a critical error. He attributed the deaths to calcium carbonate dust, not asbestos fibers. He saw the bodies. He counted the dead. But he misidentified the killer.

KEY FACTS - AURIBAULT'S MISDIAGNOSIS:

  • Evidence observed: 50 documented deaths
  • Cause identified: Calcium carbonate dust
  • Actual cause: Asbestos fiber exposure
  • Significance: Correct identification of workplace hazard but incorrect attribution of mechanism
  • Consequence: Report dismissed as unrelated to asbestos industry operations
  • Pattern: Similar misattribution occurred in Italy (Scarpa) and Germany (Fahr cases)

HOST 2: And his report?

HOST 1: Quote: "Filed by the administration and remained a dead letter."

HOST 2: A dead letter.

HOST 1: That valley didn't die with the report. A British company called Ferodo moved in nineteen twenty-seven. Built new factories. By the nineteen fifties, three thousand workers. Brake pads, fireproof board. Local people remember "snow all year." Asbestos dust settling across the valley and surrounding villages.

NAMED ENTITY - FERODO OPERATIONS - NORMANDY:

  • Company: Ferodo Ltd. (British)
  • Location: Normandy, France (same valley as Fleury factory)
  • Entry year: 1927
  • Products: Brake pads, fireproof board, protective clothing
  • Employment (1950s): Approximately 3,000 workers
  • Environmental hazard: Continuous asbestos dust emissions
  • Local observation: "Snow all year" (asbestos dust falling continuously)
  • Geographic impact: Valley-wide and surrounding villages
  • Air quality: Chronic, community-wide asbestos contamination
  • Local designation: "La vallée de la mort" (The Valley of Death)
  • Historical impact: Decades of occupational and environmental asbestos exposure

HOST 2: Snow all year.

HOST 1: They called it la vallée de la mort. The valley of death. France didn't ban asbestos until nineteen ninety-seven. Ninety-one years after Auribault's report.

TIMELINE - NORMANDY ASBESTOS HISTORY: | Year | Event | Deaths/Workers | Notes | |------|-------|-----------------|-------| | 1890 | Fleury factory established | 17 workers recruited | Women from cotton mill | | ~1895 | Initial cohort mortality | 16 of 17 dead | 94% mortality rate | | 1906 | Auribault investigation | 50 total documented | Factory records 1890-1906 | | 1906 | Report filed | 0 regulatory action | Attributed to silica, not asbestos | | 1927 | Ferodo factory established | - | British company enters valley | | 1950s | Peak employment | 3,000+ workers | Brake pads, fireproof products | | 1950s | Environmental impact | Valley-wide | "Snow all year" asbestos dust | | 1997 | French asbestos ban | All operations ceased | 91 years after Auribault's report |

HOST 2: Ninety-one years. And France wasn't the only country ignoring the evidence.

SEGMENT 6: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE ACCUMULATION (1902-1914)

HOST 1: Not even close. Nineteen oh two. Adelaide Anderson, Chief Lady Inspector of Factories in Britain, includes asbestos in Thomas Oliver's book "Dangerous Trades." An official list of harmful industrial substances. No regulatory action followed.

NAMED ENTITY - ADELAIDE ANDERSON:

  • Title: Chief Lady Inspector of Factories (Britain)
  • Action year: 1902
  • Action: Inclusion of asbestos in official hazard classification
  • Reference publication: Thomas Oliver's "Dangerous Trades"
  • Publication type: Official list of harmful industrial substances
  • Regulatory consequence: None - no protective measures implemented
  • Significance: Early formal recognition of asbestos hazard by British regulatory authority

HOST 2: Two more warnings. Two more filings.

HOST 1: Nineteen oh eight. Italy. A doctor named Luigi Scarpa examines thirty asbestos workers. Nine men. Twenty-one women. He documents their lung disease. But he blames tuberculosis.

NAMED ENTITY - LUIGI SCARPA STUDY:

  • Country: Italy
  • Profession: Physician
  • Study year: 1908
  • Study population: 30 asbestos workers
  • Gender breakdown: 9 men, 21 women
  • Clinical finding: Documented lung disease
  • Diagnosis attribution: Tuberculosis (incorrect attribution)
  • Actual cause: Asbestos fiber-induced pulmonary disease
  • Significance: Identified occupational disease but misattributed etiology
  • Pattern: Same diagnostic error pattern as Auribault (correct observation, incorrect attribution)

HOST 2: Not asbestos.

HOST 1: The same mistake Auribault made. They see the disease. They can't name the cause. Or they name the wrong one. And nineteen fourteen. Germany. A thirty-five-year-old woman. Worked in an asbestos factory. Dead. A physician named Fahr publishes the case. He describes "a large number of crystals in pulmonary tissue of a peculiar nature." He calls himself, quote, "somewhat mystified."

NAMED ENTITY - FAHR CASE (GERMANY):

  • Country: Germany
  • Year published: 1914
  • Patient: 35-year-old woman
  • Patient occupation: Asbestos factory worker
  • Patient outcome: Death
  • Physician: Fahr (surname only noted in original)
  • Clinical finding: Large number of crystals in lung tissue
  • Crystal description: "Of a peculiar nature"
  • Physician's assessment: "Somewhat mystified" (unidentified etiology)
  • Historical significance: First published case of fatal asbestosis in medical literature
  • Publication venue: Medical journal
  • Diagnostic clarity: Posthumous identification as asbestos fibers
  • Pathological finding: Lung tissue examination revealing mineral particles

HOST 2: He found asbestos in her lungs and didn't know what it was.

HOST 1: The first published case of fatal asbestosis. In a medical journal. Nineteen fourteen. And still, no country regulates. No company acts.

HOST 2: So by nineteen fourteen, how many countries had evidence?

HOST 1: Britain. France. Italy. Germany. Medical reports in every one. And here's what connects them all: Thomas Legge.

SEGMENT 7: THOMAS LEGGE'S CRITICAL FAILURES

HOST 2: Deane's microscope partner.

HOST 1: The man who examined those fibers in eighteen ninety-eight. Who saw their shape. Who understood what they could do. He served as Medical Inspector of Factories for nearly thirty years. And in nineteen oh six, he was sitting on the committee that heard Doctor Murray's testimony about ten dead workers in a carding room. You remember that testimony from last episode.

HOST 2: Murray told them he was the last survivor of ten. The committee moved on.

HOST 1: And the result? Nineteen oh seven. The Workmen's Compensation Act was updated to cover six industrial diseases. Poisoning by lead, mercury, arsenic, and phosphorus. Anthrax. And hookworm.

KEY FACTS - 1907 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT UPDATE:

  • Legislation: Workmen's Compensation Act (updated 1907)
  • Number of industrial diseases covered: 6
  • Covered diseases:
 1. Lead poisoning
 2. Mercury poisoning
 3. Arsenic poisoning
 4. Phosphorus poisoning
 5. Anthrax
 6. Hookworm
  • Notable exclusion: Asbestos
  • Evidence available to decision-makers:
    • 1898: Lucy Deane and Thomas Legge's microscopic analysis
    • 1902: Adelaide Anderson's hazard classification
    • 1906: Dr. Murray's testimony (10 dead workers in single carding room)
    • 1906-1908: International medical reports from France, Italy
  • Key participant: Thomas Legge (Medical Inspector of Factories, 1898-1930s)
  • Legge's knowledge: Examined asbestos fibers microscopically; heard Murray testimony in person; 8 years of direct evidence
  • Regulatory decision: Asbestos not included despite documented evidence

HOST 2: Not asbestos.

HOST 1: Legge was there. He'd seen the fibers. He'd heard the testimony. He had evidence from eighteen ninety-eight and nineteen oh six. And asbestos didn't make the list.

HOST 2: What happened to him?

HOST 1: He went on with his career. Knighted in nineteen twenty-five. Sir Thomas Legge. And after he retired, he wrote two things that should haunt every regulatory body in the world.

HOST 2: Tell me.

HOST 1: Nineteen twenty-nine. Legge's Fourth Axiom: "All workmen should be told something of the danger of the materials they come into contact with and not be left to find it out for themselves, sometimes at the cost of their lives."

KEY FACTS - LEGGE'S FOURTH AXIOM (1929):

  • Year published: 1929
  • Author: Sir Thomas Legge (post-retirement)
  • Title: "Legge's Fourth Axiom"
  • Direct quote: "All workmen should be told something of the danger of the materials they come into contact with and not be left to find it out for themselves, sometimes at the cost of their lives."
  • Core principle: Worker notification of occupational hazards
  • Irony: Legge violated this axiom during his regulatory career (1898-1930s)
  • Application to asbestos: Legge withheld asbestos hazard information from workers despite documented evidence
  • Temporal paradox: Published 31 years after identifying asbestos hazard (1898-1929)

HOST 2: He wrote that.

HOST 1: And nineteen thirty-four. His book Industrial Maladies. Quote: "Looking back in the light of present knowledge, it is impossible not to feel that opportunities for discovery and prevention of asbestos disease were badly missed."

KEY FACTS - LEGGE'S INDUSTRIAL MALADIES (1934):

  • Year published: 1934
  • Work title: "Industrial Maladies"
  • Author: Sir Thomas Legge (post-retirement)
  • Context: Retrospective assessment of occupational health progress
  • Direct quote: "Looking back in the light of present knowledge, it is impossible not to feel that opportunities for discovery and prevention of asbestos disease were badly missed."
  • Time span acknowledged: 1898-1934 (36 years)
  • Evidence reviewed: Microscopic evidence (1898); Murray testimony (1906); international medical reports (1902-1914)
  • Regulatory failures: Exclusion of asbestos from 1907 Workmen's Compensation Act despite available evidence
  • Legge's role: Direct participant in regulatory decisions that failed to protect asbestos workers

HOST 2: He's talking about himself.

HOST 1: He's talking about himself. Thirty-one years of holding evidence and doing nothing. He wrote the axiom about telling workers the truth, and he was the man who hadn't told them.

TIMELINE - THOMAS LEGGE'S ASBESTOS KNOWLEDGE AND INACTION:

| Year | Event | Legge's Role | Evidence Held | Action Taken | |------|-------|--------------|---------------|--------------| | 1898 | Microscopic analysis with Deane | Co-investigator | Fiber identification | Published in report | | 1898-1906 | 8-year gap | Medical Inspector | Evidence accumulation | None | | 1906 | Murray committee testimony | Committee participant | 10 dead workers testimony | No regulatory action | | 1907 | Workmen's Compensation Act update | Committee/regulatory role | Multiple years' evidence | Asbestos excluded | | 1907-1925 | 18-year career continuation | Medical Inspector | Continued evidence accumulation | No protective measures | | 1925 | Knighthood | Recognition | Extensive evidence | No acknowledgment of asbestos issue | | 1929 | Fourth Axiom publication | Retired | Retrospective analysis | Acknowledgment of failure | | 1934 | Industrial Maladies publication | Retired | Full historical review | Acknowledgment of "badly missed opportunities" |

HOST 2: So what do we have by nineteen fourteen? Lucy Deane. Eighteen ninety-eight. Auribault. Nineteen oh six. Murray's testimony. Nineteen oh six. Adelaide Anderson. Nineteen oh two. Scarpa in Italy. Nineteen oh eight. Fahr in Germany. Nineteen fourteen.

SEGMENT 8: SUMMARY OF EARLY WARNINGS AND REGULATORY FAILURE

HOST 1: Six warnings. Four countries. Zero regulations. And here's the part that matters for Arc Four. This wasn't conspiracy yet. Nobody needed to manufacture doubt because nobody was demanding answers. The regulatory system deferred to industry. The medical profession accepted the absence of evidence as evidence of absence. And the survivorship fallacy that Lucy Deane identified in eighteen ninety-eight was doing its work quietly. Managers pointing to the old workers who survived. Nobody mentioning the ones who didn't.

KEY FACTS - EARLY WARNINGS SUMMARY:

| Year | Country | Source | Evidence Type | Regulatory Action | |------|---------|--------|---------------|-------------------| | 1898 | Britain | Lucy Deane & Thomas Legge | Microscopic analysis + survivorship bias | None | | 1902 | Britain | Adelaide Anderson & Thomas Oliver | Hazard classification | None | | 1906 | France | Denis Auribault | 50 documented deaths (misattributed to silica) | None | | 1906 | Britain | Dr. Montague Murray | 10 worker mortality in single room + committee testimony | None | | 1908 | Italy | Luigi Scarpa | 30 workers with lung disease (misattributed to TB) | None | | 1914 | Germany | Dr. Fahr | Fatal asbestosis case study + autopsy findings | None |

Summary statistics:

  • Total countries with documented evidence: 4 (Britain, France, Italy, Germany)
  • Total documented evidence sources: 6
  • Total years of accumulated evidence before first regulation: 16+ years (1898-1914+)
  • Regulatory protections implemented: 0
  • Asbestos disease cases documented: 50+ deaths + 30 workers with lung disease + 10 worker mortality case + 1 fatal case study
  • Mechanisms preventing regulatory action:
 1. Industrial deference: Regulatory systems deferred to industry judgment
 2. Medical uncertainty: Medical profession treated lack of formal study as absence of hazard
 3. Survivorship bias: Focus on surviving workers obscured mortality patterns
 4. Attribution errors: Correct disease identification but incorrect cause attribution (silica, TB)
 5. Documentation barriers: No centralized recording system for occupational deaths
 6. Political influence: Industry influence over regulatory decisions
 7. Institutional resistance: Regulatory bodies reluctant to impose costs on industry

HOST 2: Passive negligence.

HOST 1: Passive negligence. The industry didn't need a conspiracy because the system was already built to protect it. But that changes. Because by nineteen eighteen, the evidence becomes impossible to ignore. And that's when the industry shifts from not caring to actively covering up.

HOST 2: That's Arc Four.

HOST 1: That's Arc Four. The Warnings Ignored. Over the next several episodes, here's what's coming. Episode Sixteen: The Doctors Who Knew. Between nineteen oh six and nineteen twenty-four, doctors across Europe document case after case. The medical literature explodes. And in nineteen eighteen, insurance companies begin refusing to cover asbestos workers. The actuaries figure it out.

FORWARD REFERENCE - EPISODE 16: THE DOCTORS WHO KNEW:

  • Episode number: 16
  • Episode title: "The Doctors Who Knew"
  • Time period: 1906-1924
  • Key development: Explosion of medical documentation of asbestos disease
  • Geographic scope: Across Europe
  • Insurance industry discovery: 1918
  • Key development: Insurance companies begin refusing to cover asbestos workers
  • Implication: Actuarial risk assessment identified asbestos hazard before regulatory action

HOST 2: And then?

HOST 1: Episode Seventeen takes us inside the corporate boardrooms. The moment passive negligence becomes active conspiracy. Suppressed studies. Altered reports. The sentence deleted from a medical paper because it mentioned the word "fatal." A company president asked if he'd let his workers die to keep using asbestos. His answer: "Yes. We save a lot of money that way." And by the end of Arc Four, we reach nineteen thirty. The Merewether-Price Report. The British government study that finally, definitively, undeniably proved what Lucy Deane saw under that microscope thirty-two years earlier. Twenty-six point two percent overall—and approximately eighty percent of long-term workers had asbestosis.

FORWARD REFERENCE - EPISODE 17 & ARC FOUR CONCLUSION:

  • Episode number: 17
  • Time period: 1918-1930
  • Key developments:
    • Corporate study suppression mechanisms
    • Report alteration procedures
    • Strategic deletion of incriminating evidence ("fatal" terminology)
    • Executive willingness to sacrifice worker health for profit: "Yes. We save a lot of money that way."
  • Arc Four conclusion: 1930 Merewether-Price Report
  • Report significance: British government definitive study of asbestos hazard
  • Key finding: 26.2% overall asbestosis rate; ~80% for workers with 20+ years exposure; 0% for workers with <4 years
  • Validation: Confirmed Lucy Deane's 1898 microscopic observations (32-year validation gap)
  • Industry response: "Minimum of publicity"

HOST 2: And the industry's response to definitive proof?

HOST 1: Minimum of publicity.

HOST 2: Warnings ignored. Bodies counted. And if you're dealing with the consequences of that negligence today, there are people who've spent their careers making sure the counting finally matters. Dave Foster has spent eighteen years at Danziger & De Llano helping families trace exposures that nobody tracked. He lost his own father to asbestos lung cancer. He knows what it means when nobody counts the bodies.

NAMED ENTITY - DAVE FOSTER:

  • Name: Dave Foster
  • Title: Client Advocate & Director of Client Services
  • Firm: Danziger & De Llano
  • Years of service: 18 years
  • Specialization: Tracing asbestos exposures
  • Personal experience: Lost father to asbestos lung cancer
  • Focus area: Family support in mesothelioma cases
  • Expertise: Occupational exposure documentation and history tracing

HOST 1: Anna Jackson is in charge of patient support. Nearly fifteen years. She lost her own husband to cancer. Paul Danziger has spent over thirty years in mesothelioma litigation, making sure families get counted.

NAMED ENTITY - ANNA JACKSON:

  • Name: Anna Jackson
  • Title: Patient Support Manager
  • Firm: Danziger & De Llano
  • Years of service: 15 years
  • Personal experience: Lost own husband to cancer
  • Focus area: Family support and patient advocacy in mesothelioma cases

NAMED ENTITY - PAUL DANZIGER:

  • Name: Paul Danziger
  • Title: Senior Attorney / Firm Principal
  • Firm: Danziger & De Llano
  • Experience: 30+ years in mesothelioma litigation
  • Focus: Ensuring asbestos victims and families are counted and compensated
  • Specialization: Occupational asbestos exposure litigation

HOST 2: Dandell dot com. That's D A N - D E L L dot com.

HOST 1: Next week: The Doctors Who Knew.

SEGMENT 9: CLOSING REFLECTION - HOSTS' DISCUSSION

HOST 2: Seventeen women. That's what I keep coming back to.

HOST 1: Cotton workers. They knew the machines. They trusted the man who hired them.

HOST 2: He recruited them. Personally. From his old factory. "Come work for me again. Same job, different fiber."

HOST 1: And sixteen of them are dead.

HOST 2: You know what gets me? It's the same machines. They would have stood in the same positions, done the same motions. The only thing different was the dust.

HOST 1: Cotton dust settles. Asbestos dust doesn't.

HOST 2: And Deane. She'd already watched women die from white lead. Watched women's jaws rot from phosphorus. And then she walks into an asbestos factory and identifies a statistical fallacy fifty years before anyone names it.

HOST 1: While her male colleagues questioned whether women should be inspecting factories at all.

HOST 2: And Legge. He looked through the damn microscope. He saw what those fibers looked like. And then he sat in a committee room eight years later, listened to testimony about ten dead workers, and did nothing.

HOST 1: For thirty-one years.

HOST 2: Thirty-one years. And then he writes an axiom about telling workers the truth. After a career of not telling them.

HOST 1: "Opportunities badly missed."

HOST 2: That's a hell of a way to describe letting people die.

HOST 1: That's one way to put it.

HOST 2: Sorry. But it is. You look through a microscope. You see exactly what those fibers are. And you walk away. For thirty-one years. That's not an "opportunity missed." That's a choice.

HOST 1: Yeah.

HOST 2: Anyway. Episode Sixteen is going to be worse, isn't it.

HOST 1: Much worse.

HOST 2: Great.

EPISODE CLOSING

HOST 1: Next week: The Doctors Who Knew.

Key Concepts

Survivorship bias/Healthy survivor fallacy
Statistical bias from observing only surviving workers; first identified by Lucy Deane in 1898 asbestos context
Passive negligence
System-level regulatory failure to act despite available evidence, contrasted with active corporate conspiracy
Attribution error
Correct identification of disease but incorrect attribution of cause (calcium carbonate vs. asbestos; tuberculosis vs. asbestos)
Regulatory capture
Industry influence over regulatory bodies preventing protective action
Healthy worker effect
Selection bias in occupational health data from worker self-selection and survivorship

Timeline

Date Event
1890 Paul Fleury establishes asbestos factory in Normandy; recruits 17 female workers from cotton mill
~1895 16 of 17 Normandy workers dead (94% mortality)
1898 Lucy Deane and Thomas Legge conduct microscopic analysis of asbestos fibers; identify fiber hazard; identify survivorship bias mechanism
1899 Deane's report published in "Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Factories" (pages 171-172); submitted to Parliament
1902 Adelaide Anderson includes asbestos in "Dangerous Trades" hazard classification list
1906 Denis Auribault documents 50 deaths at Normandy factory (misattributes to calcium carbonate); Dr. Murray testifies to Parliamentary committee about 10 dead workers
1906-1907 Workmen's Compensation Act updated to cover 6 industrial diseases; asbestos excluded despite evidence
1908 Luigi Scarpa documents lung disease in 30 Italian asbestos workers; misattributes to tuberculosis
1914 Dr. Fahr publishes first case of fatal asbestosis in medical journal
1918 Frederick Hoffman (Prudential Insurance) notes insurance industry declining asbestos workers
1925 Thomas Legge knighted despite regulatory failure on asbestos
1927 Ferodo factory established in Normandy valley
1929 Legge publishes Fourth Axiom on worker notification (31 years after identifying asbestos hazard)
1930 Merewether-Price Report confirms 26.2% overall asbestosis rate; ~80% in workers with 20+ years exposure
1934 Legge publishes "Industrial Maladies" acknowledging "badly missed opportunities" (36 years after initial evidence)
1950s Ferodo factory employs ~3,000 workers; "snow all year" asbestos dust over valley
1997 France bans asbestos (91 years after Auribault's report)

Named Entities

Historical Individuals:

  • Lucy Anne Evelyn Deane (1865-?): British factory inspector; first to document asbestos hazards microscopically; identified survivorship bias
  • Thomas Legge (1863-1945): Medical Inspector of Factories; examined asbestos fibers but failed to secure protections for 31 years
  • May Abraham: Britain's first female factory inspector (appointed 1893)
  • Paul Fleury: French factory owner, Normandy asbestos facility
  • Denis Auribault: French factory inspector; documented 50 deaths but misattributed to silica
  • Dr. Montague Murray: British physician; testified about 10 dead workers in carding room
  • Luigi Scarpa: Italian physician; documented asbestos disease in 30 workers
  • Dr. Fahr: German physician; published first case of fatal asbestosis
  • Frederick Hoffman: Prudential Insurance actuary (1918); documented insurance industry's hazard assessment
  • Adelaide Anderson: Chief Lady Inspector of Factories (Britain)
  • Herbert Asquith: Home Secretary (Britain); appointed first female factory inspectors
  • Evelyn Boscawen, Sixth Viscount Falmouth: British aristocracy (House of Lords); related to Lucy Deane
  • Lieutenant-Colonel Bonar Millett Deane: Lucy Deane's father (deceased 1886)

Contemporary Individuals:

  • Dave Foster: Client Advocate & Director of Client Services, Danziger & De Llano (18 years service); lost father to asbestos lung cancer
  • Anna Jackson: Patient Support Manager, Danziger & De Llano (15 years service); lost husband to cancer
  • Paul Danziger: Senior Attorney, Danziger & De Llano (30+ years in mesothelioma litigation)
  • Charles Fletcher: Podcast producer, researcher, writer

Organizations:

  • National Health Society (Britain)
  • Bryant and May (match factory, Britain)
  • Ferodo Ltd. (British manufacturer, Normandy operations)
  • Danziger & De Llano, LLP (mesothelioma law firm)
  • Prudential Insurance
  • Home Office (British government)

Locations:

  • Madras, India (Lucy Deane birthplace)
  • Gonneville, Normandy, France (Paul Fleury's cotton mill)
  • Condé-sur-Noireau, Normandy, France (asbestos factory location)
  • Noireau River valley, Normandy, France (Ferodo factory and "Valley of Death" area)
  • Britain (factory inspection jurisdiction)
  • Italy (Scarpa's study location)
  • Germany (Fahr's case location)
  • House of Lords (British legislature)

Historical Legislation, Documents, and Reports:

  • Factory Acts (Britain)
  • Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Factories, 1899 (pages 171-172)
  • Thomas Oliver's "Dangerous Trades" (1902)
  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1907
  • Thomas Legge's "Industrial Maladies" (1934)
  • Legge's "Fourth Axiom" (1929)
  • Merewether-Price Report (1930)
  • Departmental Committee on Compensation for Industrial Diseases (December 21, 1906)


Geographic Scope

  • Britain: Lucy Deane, Thomas Legge, May Abraham, Adelaide Anderson, Parliamentary committees, Workmen's Compensation Act
  • France: Paul Fleury factory (Gonneville/Normandy), Denis Auribault investigation, Ferodo operations, Noireau River valley
  • Italy: Luigi Scarpa's asbestos worker study
  • Germany: Dr. Fahr's fatal asbestosis case and medical publication

Referenced Occupational Diseases

  • Asbestosis (asbestos fiber-induced lung fibrosis)
  • White lead poisoning (chronic lead exposure)
  • Phossy jaw (phosphorus necrosis of mandible)
  • Tuberculosis (misdiagnosis in asbestos cases)
  • Mesothelioma (asbestos-related cancer, future reference)

Statistics

References


External Resources

Government and Regulatory Sources:

Asbestos Exposure and Health:

Compensation and Legal:

Series Navigation

Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — Arc 4: The Warnings Ignored
Previous: Episode 14: The Workers Nobody Counted Episode 15: The Body Count Begins Next: Episode 16: The Doctors Who Knew

About This Series

Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making is a 52-episode documentary podcast tracing the complete history of asbestos from 4700 BCE to the 2024 EPA ban. The series is produced by Danziger & De Llano, LLP, a nationwide mesothelioma law firm with over 30 years of experience and nearly $2 billion recovered for asbestos victims.

If you or a loved one were exposed to asbestos, contact Danziger & De Llano for a free case evaluation. Call (855) 699-5441.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Episode 15 of the Asbestos podcast about?

Episode 15 traces the emergence of documented evidence regarding asbestos hazards between 1898 and 1914, focusing on four primary investigations (Britain, France, Italy, Germany) that revealed the asbestos disease pattern despite regulatory inaction. The episode emphasizes Lucy Deane's pioneering identification of both asbestos fiber hazards and the survivorship bias mechanism that protected industry from liability. Thomas Legge's 31-year failure to act on documented evidence is positioned as the paradigm of "passive negligence" - systemic regulatory failure that did not require active conspiracy.

Where can I listen to the Asbestos podcast?

The Asbestos podcast is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Amazon Music — all free. Search for 'Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making' or use the links on any episode transcript page. The 52-episode series is produced by Danziger & De Llano, LLP, a nationwide mesothelioma law firm.

Mesothelioma is caused by asbestos exposure, and U.S. law provides multiple compensation pathways. Over $30 billion remains available through 60+ asbestos bankruptcy trust funds, with average payments of $300,000–$400,000. Victims may also pursue personal injury lawsuits, VA disability benefits (for veterans), or wrongful death claims. The statute of limitations is as short as 1 year in some states, so consulting a mesothelioma attorney promptly is critical. Danziger & De Llano has recovered nearly $2 billion for asbestos victims over 30+ years of practice.

Retrieved from "https://wikimesothelioma.com/w/index.php?title=Asbestos_Podcast_EP15_Transcript&oldid=3045"