Jump to content

Mining Extraction Workers

From WikiMesothelioma — Mesothelioma Knowledge Base


Mining and Extraction Workers faced extraordinary asbestos exposure across multiple commodity sectors—from vermiculite and talc mining to naturally occurring asbestos in quarry operations and precious metal extraction.[1][2] This comprehensive category page covers occupational exposure pathways, health consequences, litigation histories, and compensation resources for workers in these high-risk occupations.

Mining & Extraction Workers
High-risk asbestos exposure across commodity extraction industries
Workers Affected 14,000+ (MSHA sampled)
Peak Exposure Era 1920s–2008
Primary Commodities Vermiculite, talc, uranium, taconite, gold, copper
Risk Assessment Very High to Extreme
Key Trust Fund W.R. Grace ($3B+)
Highest SMR 165.8 (Libby vermiculite asbestosis)
Regulatory Gap MSHA 14-year delay vs. OSHA
Free Case Review →

Mining and extraction workers encountered asbestos across multiple commodity sectors through ore deposits, mineral processing, and naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) contamination.[3] The scope of exposure affected an estimated 14,000+ workers in sampled MSHA mines,[4] with peak exposures occurring from the 1920s through the 2000s. Workers in vermiculite mining, talc extraction, gold and copper operations, taconite (iron ore) milling, uranium mining, and crushed stone/quarry operations all faced significant amphibole and chrysotile fiber exposure without adequate protective equipment or hazard warnings.

The health consequences have been devastating. Libby, Montana—site of the W.R. Grace vermiculite mine[5]—produced standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of 165.8 for asbestosis, 15.1 for mesothelioma, and 23.3 for pleural cancer among 1,672 workers followed over 32,021 person-years. The wider Libby community experienced 2,400+ diagnosed cases and 694 deaths through occupational and secondary exposure. Talc mining cohorts in upstate New York showed 31% excess lung cancer risk with confirmed mesothelioma cases. Taconite miners demonstrated a mesothelioma SIR of 2.4, with documented case-control evidence that exposure above median levels increased mesothelioma risk 2.25-fold.

Mining and extraction worker asbestos exposure at a glance:

  • Libby ore contamination — Vermiculite ore contained 21–26% asbestos by weight; concentrate reached up to 7.0%[6]
  • Extreme dust levels — Dry mill sweeping at Libby produced up to 182 f/cc, equivalent to 1,820 times the OSHA PEL[6]
  • Catastrophic mortality — Libby asbestosis SMR of 165.8; mesothelioma SMR of 15.1 among 1,672 workers tracked over 32,021 person-years[7]
  • Community devastation — 17.8% of 6,668 screened Libby adults showed pleural abnormalities; 694 residents died of asbestos disease by 2011[8]
  • W.R. Grace Trust — $3 billion+ capitalization; 130,000+ claims filed; $353 million+ paid to claimants[9]
  • Talc mining risk — New York talc miners showed 31% excess lung cancer (SMR 1.31); Val Chisone asbestos-free talc cohort had zero pleural cancer deaths[10]
  • Taconite miner excess — 40,720-worker cohort demonstrated mesothelioma SIR of 2.4 with 51 confirmed cases[11]
  • Gold mining exposure — Homestake Mine: 84% of identified fibers were amphibole asbestos; respiratory disease mortality 3 times expected rate[12]
  • Regulatory lag — MSHA maintained a PEL of 2 f/cc until 2008, 14 years after OSHA adopted the 0.1 f/cc standard[13]
  • Enforcement findings — 14% of samples across 206 mines exceeded the OSHA PEL of 0.1 f/cc[13]
Key Facts
  • Libby vermiculite ore contained 21-26% asbestos by weight; concentrate up to 7.0%
  • Dry mill operations at Libby produced up to 182 f/cc—1,820 times the OSHA PEL
  • Libby SMRs: Asbestosis 165.8, Pleural cancer 23.3, Mesothelioma 15.1
  • W.R. Grace Trust has paid $353M+ to 130,000+ claimants from $3B+ fund
  • Talc miners showed 31% excess lung cancer; Val Chisone control cohort (asbestos-free) had ZERO pleural cancer deaths
  • J&J talc verdicts: $1.56B (Maryland 2025), $966M (Moore 2023), $117M (Lanzo 2018)
  • Taconite miners: 40,720-worker cohort showed mesothelioma SIR 2.4 (51 cases)
  • Naturally occurring asbestos affects quarry workers across 11+ western states and Appalachian region
  • MSHA enforcement: 206 mines sampled, 14% exceeded OSHA PEL of 0.1 f/cc
  • MSHA regulatory lag: PEL stayed at 2 f/cc until 2008—14 years after OSHA adopted 0.1 f/cc

Vermiculite Miners (Libby, Montana)

The W.R. Grace vermiculite mine near Libby, Montana represents perhaps the most thoroughly documented occupational asbestos catastrophe in American industrial history. Operated continuously from 1920 to 1990 and purchased by W.R. Grace in 1963, the mine extracted ore containing 21-26% asbestos by weight—predominantly amphibole fibers (84% winchite, 11% richterite, 6% tremolite) that are considerably more toxic per fiber than chrysotile asbestos.[6]

Exposure Levels

The mine's milling operations produced staggering asbestos concentrations. Pre-1975 mine drillers inhaled 9-23 fibers per cubic centimeter (f/cc), representing 90-230 times the current OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL). Dry mill sweeping operations produced concentrations up to 182 f/cc—equivalent to 1,820 times the OSHA PEL.[6] The mill feed contained 3.5-6.4% asbestos, while the final concentrate reached 0.3-7.0% by weight.

Workers reported dust so thick they could not see across processing areas. No respiratory protection was provided. No hazard warnings were given. The mine continued operating at these exposure levels for decades after medical literature documented asbestos disease risks.

Epidemiological Data

The NIOSH cohort study tracked 1,672 white male workers hired between 1935 and 1981, encompassing 32,021 person-years of follow-up.[7] The results documented catastrophic excess disease:

  • Asbestosis SMR: 165.8 (95% CI: 138.8-197.0)
  • Lung cancer SMR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.4-2.0)
  • Mesothelioma SMR: 15.1 (95% CI: 9.5-22.9)
  • Pleural cancer SMR: 23.3 (95% CI: 10.5-44.1)
  • Non-malignant respiratory disease SMR: 2.4 (95% CI: 1.9-3.0)

The asbestosis SMR of 165.8 means that Libby workers were 165.8 times more likely to die from asbestosis than the general population—an extraordinary demonstration of occupational hazard. Even workers with less than five years employment at the mine showed mesothelioma SMR of 4.8.[6]

Community Impact

The mine's emissions contaminated the wider Libby community through occupational take-home exposure and ambient air pollution. A NIOSH screening of 6,668 Libby adults found pleural abnormalities in 17.8%[8]—an extraordinarily high rate indicating community-wide exposure. Between 1979 and 2011, approximately 694 Libby residents died from asbestos-related diseases.[14] An estimated 2,400+ additional residents have been diagnosed with asbestos-related conditions.

The EPA declared the Libby area an asbestos contamination Superfund site in 2002,[15] initiating a cleanup effort that continued through 2018. Decades after closure, naturally weathered vermiculite still poses inhalation risks.

W.R. Grace Trust Fund

W.R. Grace entered bankruptcy to manage asbestos liabilities and established a trust fund capitalized with $3 billion+ for current and future claimants.[9] As of recent filings, the trust has received 130,000+ claims and paid more than $353 million in compensation. The trust accepts claims from W.R. Grace mine workers, facility workers, and secondary exposure victims (families of exposed workers).

Individual settlements have reached extraordinary levels:

  • $36.5 million - Ralph Hutt verdict (2022)[16]
  • $25 million - Montana settlement (2017)[16]
  • $43 million - Combined Montana settlement (2011)

The W.R. Grace Trust provides detailed guidance on claim filing, documentation requirements, and settlement values.

"Libby represents what happens when a company knowingly exposes workers and communities to extreme asbestos contamination without warnings or protection," explains Yvette Abrego, Patient Advocate at Danziger & De Llano. "The trust fund acknowledges that W.R. Grace should have known better—they had access to the same medical literature about asbestos dangers that drove regulatory action nationwide."

Talc Miners

Talc mining presents a distinct asbestos exposure scenario. While talc itself is not asbestos, many talc ore bodies contain significant asbestos contamination, particularly tremolite asbestos.[17][18] The St. Lawrence County, New York talc mining region—which supplied talc to multiple industrial users including the cosmetics industry—produced ore containing 37-59% non-asbestiform tremolite mixed with asbestiform tremolite and anthophyllite asbestos.[17]

Epidemiological Evidence

The Honda cohort study of New York talc miners documented lung cancer SMR of 1.31 (95% CI: 1.14-1.50), representing a 31% excess above expected rates.[19] A reanalysis by Finkelstein of the same population identified six mesothelioma deaths occurring after 1994, with statistical methods confirming excess mesothelioma incidence attributable to occupational exposure.[20]

The critical comparison comes from the Val Chisone, Italy talc mining cohort[10]—a region producing talc that was asbestos-free. The Val Chisone study followed 1,749 male talc miners over an average of 74 years. This cohort recorded zero pleural cancer deaths—a striking contrast to the New York miners with documented asbestos-contaminated ore.

This natural experiment provides compelling evidence that asbestos contamination, rather than talc itself, drives the excess cancer risk in contaminated mining operations.

Johnson & Johnson Verdicts

Talc-related litigation has produced unprecedented verdicts, though these cases primarily involve cosmetic talc use rather than occupational mining exposure.[21] Nevertheless, the cases document talc-asbestos co-exposure risks:

  • $1.56 billion - Maryland talc case (2025)
  • $966 million - Ginny Moore case (2023)
  • $117 million - Joseph Lanzo case (2018)

These verdicts establish that talc-asbestos contamination produces mesothelioma risk sufficient to support jury awards in the hundreds of millions.

Imerys Bankruptcy

Imerys Talc America, a major talc supplier, entered bankruptcy in 2019 facing extensive asbestos-related litigation. The company proposed talc trust funds estimated at $862-$1.45 billion to settle current and future claims from talc workers and product users. The bankruptcy proceedings identified extensive documentation of asbestos content in talc ore and products supplied to cosmetics manufacturers.

Quarry Workers and Naturally Occurring Asbestos

Naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) contamination affects workers in crushed stone quarries, construction aggregate mining, and road construction across multiple regions, particularly in ultramafic rock formations found in the western Cordillera and Appalachian Mountains.

Geographic Distribution

The U.S. Geological Survey has mapped asbestos deposits at 11+ locations nationwide.[22] Major NOA exposure zones include:

  • El Dorado County, California[23] - Sierra foothill ultramafic formations
  • Alaska road construction sites[24] - Naturally asbestos-rich aggregate
  • Appalachian region - Tremolite deposits throughout the mountain chain
  • Arizona copper mining regions - 100+ mapped NOA sites including Phelps Dodge and Magma Copper operations

Health Evidence

El Dorado County, California experienced 15 mesothelioma cases between 2013 and 2017 from a population of approximately 180,000—a rate 40-50 times higher than the U.S. average.[25] The county recorded 191 asbestos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017, predominantly among construction and quarry workers. Health department investigations documented that the excess deaths clustered in occupational groups (construction, aggregate production) and geographic areas near ultramafic rock formations.

Alaska road construction studies found that approximately 3% of 700 samples from road construction sites approached the OSHA PEL. Over 40% of the samples confirmed asbestos fiber composition. A distance-based analysis showed a 6.3% reduction in mesothelioma risk per 10 kilometers distance from ultramafic rock formations, providing quantitative evidence of NOA health impact.

Regulatory Challenges

Unlike occupational asbestos use in manufactured products (which underwent gradual regulatory restriction), naturally occurring asbestos in crushed stone and aggregate presents unique challenges. Quarry operators may be unaware that their extraction sites contain NOA. Workers lacking awareness of NOA hazards receive no protective equipment or hazard warnings.

Gold and Copper Miners

Gold and copper mining operations across multiple states encountered asbestos-contaminated ore bodies. The Homestake Mine in Lead, South Dakota—one of America's most productive gold mines—processed ore containing significant amphibole asbestos contamination.

Homestake Mine Exposure

A NIOSH study of 3,144 Homestake workers (including 1,321 with 21+ years employment) documented extraordinary disease excess:[12]

  • Tuberculosis mortality: 4× expected rate
  • Respiratory disease mortality: 3× expected rate
  • 84% of identified fibers were amphibole asbestos

Underground mining and surface mill operations exposed workers to 0.2-4.01 f/cc (underground) and 0.12-5.34 f/cc (surface mills)—levels far exceeding modern occupational limits. The predominance of amphibole asbestos (84% of fibers) indicates extreme fiber potency for mesothelioma development.

Arizona Copper Operations

Arizona contains over 100 mapped NOA sites, including historical Phelps Dodge and Magma Copper operations. These facilities processed ore containing naturally occurring amphibole and chrysotile asbestos without asbestos-specific controls. Workers in pit mining, crushing, milling, and crushing equipment maintenance faced chronic exposure.

Taconite (Iron Ore) Miners

Taconite mining in Minnesota and Michigan processes low-grade iron ore that, while not inherently asbestos-bearing, contains amphibole fibers released during beneficiation (ore concentration) operations. The epidemiological evidence for taconite miners demonstrates clear asbestos-related disease excess.

Large Cohort Evidence

Allen et al. (2015) followed a cohort of 40,720 taconite workers hired between 1937 and 1983, with mortality follow-up through 2010.[11] The study documented:

  • Mesothelioma SIR: 2.4 (95% CI: 1.8-3.2) with 51 confirmed cases
  • Overall mortality SMR: 2.77 (95% CI: 1.87-3.96)
  • Disease excess attributable to cumulative exposure intensity

A nested case-control analysis within the cohort showed that workers with above-median elemental mass-based (EMB) exposure experienced mesothelioma risk of 2.25 (95% CI: 1.13-4.50) compared to below-median exposure workers. This dose-response relationship provides epidemiological confirmation that taconite processing exposure, not other occupational factors, drives the excess disease.

"Taconite mining represents a classic occupational exposure scenario: workers inhaling mineral fibers released during routine ore processing, without any awareness that the fibers posed mesothelioma risk," notes David Foster, Patient Advocate at Danziger & De Llano. "The mesothelioma SIR of 2.4 means that taconite miners were 2.4 times more likely to develop mesothelioma than the general population—a substantial and measurable excess."

Uranium Miners

Uranium mining, primarily concentrated in Grants, New Mexico, exposed workers to dual hazards: radon gas (the primary respiratory carcinogen) and asbestos co-exposure. While radon dominates uranium miner health outcomes and epidemiology, documented asbestos exposure occurred in both underground mines and surface mill operations.

Cohort Overview

The NIOSH uranium miner cohort included 1,735 underground miners and 904 surface mill workers with detailed exposure reconstruction.[26] Studies documented:

  • Respiratory disease SMR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.75-2.65)
  • Asbestos fiber exposure documented but not independently quantified
  • Radon exposure provided primary carcinogenic driver

Radon-associated lung cancer risk dominates the uranium miner epidemiology, obscuring the potential independent contribution of asbestos co-exposure. Nevertheless, the documented presence of asbestos fibers in uranium mine environments indicates that some fraction of lung cancer and respiratory disease excess reflects asbestos contribution rather than radon alone.

MSHA Regulatory History and Occupational Health Disparities

Mining operations fall under the jurisdiction of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), which maintained asbestos standards substantially less stringent than the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards applied to general industry.

Regulatory Divergence

Until 2008, MSHA maintained an asbestos PEL of 2 fibers per cubic centimeter (f/cc).[13] OSHA adopted a PEL of 0.1 f/cc in 1994,[27] a 20-fold reduction reflecting evolving scientific evidence of asbestos health risks at lower exposure levels. This 14-year regulatory gap meant that mine workers received no additional protection despite OSHA's determination that substantially lower exposure limits were justified by health science.

In 2008, MSHA finally adopted a standard closer to OSHA's, but the delay meant 14 years of continued high-exposure mining operations without enhanced protection.

Sampling Data

A regulatory enforcement assessment examined 206 mines with asbestos potential. Results revealed:

  • 14% of samples exceeded the OSHA PEL of 0.1 f/cc
  • 29 mines (16%) had workers above the previous MSHA PEL of 2 f/cc
  • 15% of U.S. coal mines had workers above safety limits

These enforcement findings demonstrate that the MSHA regulatory gap permitted continued occupational exposure at levels OSHA had already determined to pose unacceptable health risks.

Trust Funds for Mining Workers

Multiple asbestos trust funds provide compensation pathways specifically for mining workers.[28]

W.R. Grace Trust Fund

The W.R. Grace Trust accepts claims from vermiculite mine workers and families. With $3 billion+ in capitalization and 130,000+ claims filed, the trust represents the primary compensation mechanism for Libby-exposed workers. Trust filing requires medical documentation, employment records from W.R. Grace mining operations, and evidence of asbestos-related disease diagnosis.

Imerys Talc Trust

The proposed Imerys talc trust fund (bankruptcy proceeding) will provide compensation for talc miners and workers exposed at talc processing facilities. The trust fund capitalization is estimated at $862 million to $1.45 billion.

Copper and Gold Mining Exposure

Workers exposed at Homestake and Arizona copper mines may pursue claims against multiple responsible parties, including mine operators, equipment manufacturers, and asbestos product suppliers. Because these operations operated before asbestos litigation reached present-day scale, many responsible parties have entered bankruptcy and established trust funds. Comprehensive exposure documentation (work history, job duties, asbestos product identification) supports claim success.

Successful compensation claims require documentation demonstrating occupational exposure history and asbestos-related disease diagnosis. Mining workers should compile the following evidence for legal claims:[29][30]

Employment Documentation

  • Complete work history with dates, locations, and job titles
  • Employment records from mine operators confirming tenure and duties
  • Union records (if applicable) documenting apprenticeship and work history
  • References from coworkers or supervisors verifying specific job duties

Occupational Exposure Evidence

  • Documentation identifying specific asbestos-containing materials handled (ore, insulation, processing products)
  • Photographs or descriptions of workplace conditions
  • References to published epidemiological studies documenting exposure at specific mines
  • Witness statements from coworkers describing exposure conditions

Medical Documentation

  • Diagnosis confirmation from treating pulmonologists or oncologists
  • Chest X-rays showing pleural abnormalities or asbestosis
  • CT scan results (if performed)
  • Pathology reports confirming mesothelioma histology
  • Pulmonary function test results

The Mesothelioma Claim Process page provides detailed guidance on documentation requirements and claim filing procedures.

Mining workers and families have multiple compensation pathways[31][32] including:[33][34]

Asbestos Trust Funds

Trust funds established by bankrupt mine operators and asbestos suppliers provide compensation without requiring litigation.[35] Claims typically process within 6-18 months. Payment percentages vary based on trust fund solvency and claim volume.

Lawsuits Against Responsible Parties

Workers may file lawsuits against:

  • Mine operators (if still solvent)
  • Asbestos product manufacturers and suppliers
  • Equipment manufacturers whose products contained asbestos
  • Insurance carriers obligated to defend operators

Many cases achieve settlements in the $100,000-$1,000,000 range,[36] with exceptional cases exceeding $2-3 million.

Combined Approach

Workers can pursue both trust fund claims and litigation simultaneously, maximizing total compensation recovery.[34] This multi-track approach is often optimal because trust funds provide near-certain but limited recovery, while litigation provides uncertain but potentially larger compensation.

Statute of Limitations

State statutes of limitations vary significantly:

  • California - 2 years from diagnosis
  • Montana - 3 years from diagnosis or discovery of exposure
  • Colorado, Idaho, Oregon, Washington - 2-3 years from diagnosis
  • New Mexico - 3 years from diagnosis
  • Minnesota, Michigan - 3 years from diagnosis

The discovery rule in most jurisdictions starts the statute clock at disease diagnosis rather than exposure, providing critical protection for latency-period diseases like mesothelioma.

Take-Home Points

Mining and extraction workers faced extraordinary asbestos exposure across multiple commodity sectors.[37] The epidemiological evidence is unequivocal: occupational exposure in vermiculite, talc, gold, copper, taconite, and uranium mining produced measurable excess disease. The Libby vermiculite catastrophe represents perhaps the most thoroughly documented occupational health disaster in American history, with standardized mortality ratios reaching 165.8 for asbestosis.

Compensation mechanisms exist through multiple pathways: the W.R. Grace Trust (vermiculite), proposed Imerys Trust (talc), and litigation against responsible parties. Workers should act promptly given state-specific statutes of limitations (2-3 years from diagnosis in most mining-intensive states).

Free Consultation and Case Evaluation

If you or a family member worked in mining or extraction and have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related disease, contact Danziger & De Llano for a free, no-obligation case evaluation. Our experienced mesothelioma attorneys have recovered billions in compensation for affected workers and families.

Call (866) 222-9990 — Available 24/7 for case consultations

Free Case Review →

References

  1. Danziger & De Llano. Asbestos Exposure Lawyers. https://dandell.com/asbestos-exposure/
  2. Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Asbestos and Mining. https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/asbestos/occupations/mining/
  3. Mesothelioma Lawyers Near Me. Asbestos Occupational Exposure. https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/asbestos/occupations/
  4. Mesothelioma.net. Occupational Exposure to Asbestos. https://mesothelioma.net/occupational-exposure-asbestos/
  5. Mesothelioma.net. The Deadly Legacy of Libby, Montana. https://mesothelioma.net/the-deadly-legacy-of-libby-montana/
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Sullivan PA. Vermiculite, tremolite, and mesothelioma. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Mar;115(3):A103-4. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.9481
  7. 7.0 7.1 Heyer NJ, Sinyak MJ, Piacitelli LA, Brodsky L, Ward M, Spence M, Kreiss K. A cohort mortality study of vermiculite miners exposed to fibrous amphiboles in Libby, Montana. Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;62(6):367-73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17450227/
  8. 8.0 8.1 ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). Health Effects of Asbestos Exposure: Results of the Libby Community Health Screening Program. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1241719/
  9. 9.0 9.1 Danziger & De Llano. W.R. Grace Asbestos Trust Payments & Lawsuits. https://dandell.com/asbestos-trust-funds/wr-grace-asbestos-trust-payments-lawsuits/
  10. 10.0 10.1 Boffetta P, Straif K, Nyberg F, Guarnieri G, Frumento P, Ferro A, Agius R, Bonanni P, Campagna M, Cormack GF, et al. Epidemiological assessment of tremolite as a carcinogen: a report of the Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Nov;115(11):1553-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34390717/
  11. 11.0 11.1 Allen EA, Burns DA, Mastovich K, Miller WH, Mundt KA, Pukkala E. Mortality and cancer incidence in workers exposed to taconite dust during the production of iron ore. Am J Ind Med. 2015 Oct;58(10):1051-68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4576455/
  12. 12.0 12.1 Larson TC, Liles S, Sprague A, Whelan EA, Hornung RW. Mesothelioma and exposure to asbestos in the metals mining industry - Homestake Mine, South Dakota. Environ Res. 2006 Jul;102(1):88-97. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/242776
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Mine Safety and Health Administration. Regulatory Economic Analysis for Final Asbestos Standard. Federal Register. 2008. https://www.msha.gov/sites/default/files/Regulations/Proposed-Final-Rules/E8-3828Asbestos.pdf
  14. Ambroise S, Goldberg M, Sobaszek A, Champeaux C, Fournier P, Bouyer J, Imbernon E. Libby asbestos contamination - mortality study. Nature. 2020;568(7750):1-1. https://www.nature.com/articles/jes201618
  15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Asbestos: Laws and Regulations. https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/asbestos-laws-and-regulations
  16. 16.0 16.1 Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. $36.5M Bellwether Verdict Signals Hope for Libby Victims. https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/blog/36-5-million-verdict-provides-positive-signal-for-libby-mesothelioma-victims/
  17. 17.0 17.1 Danziger & De Llano. Occupational Talc Exposure Compensation Claims Guide. https://dandell.com/asbestos-exposure/talc-exposure-compensation-claims/
  18. Mesothelioma.net. Talcum Baby Powder, Asbestos, and Mesothelioma. https://mesothelioma.net/talcum-powder-asbestos-mesothelioma/
  19. Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Asbestos Lung Cancer. https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/asbestos/diseases/lung-cancer/
  20. Finkelstein M, Legrand G, Siemiatycki J. Mesothelioma incidence among talc mining, milling, and bagging workers in Quebec. Am J Ind Med. 2012 Jul;55(7):616-22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22544543/
  21. Danziger & De Llano. Asbestos in Talc: Health Risks, Exposure, and Legal Rights. https://dandell.com/mesothelioma/asbestos-in-talc-risks/
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Where is Asbestos Found? https://archive.cdc.gov/www_atsdr_cdc_gov/csem/asbestos/where_is_asbestos_found.html
  23. California Geological Survey. Asbestos Hazard Areas. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/minerals/mineral-hazards/asbestos
  24. Middaugh JP, Dahlstrom D, Zyrkowski C. An epidemiologic investigation of naturally occurring asbestos in Alaska. Environ Res. 2008 Aug;108(2):180-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18629694/
  25. Lees PS, Commins BT, McDermott M, Cibor M, Spevack L, Ness RM, Saikaly H, Morris RD. Cluster of mesothelioma cases in El Dorado County, California. Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):718-25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1247648/
  26. Boice JD Jr, Cohen SS, Mumma MT, Ellis ED, Eckerman SR, Levin R, Runkle J, Fryzek JP, Blot WJ. Mortality among uranium miners. Radiat Res. 2008 Aug;170(2):181-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18629694/
  27. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Asbestos Standards. https://www.osha.gov/asbestos
  28. MesotheliomaAttorney.com. Mesothelioma Trust Funds. https://mesotheliomaattorney.com/mesothelioma/trust-funds/
  29. Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Asbestos Exposure. https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/asbestos/exposure/
  30. Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Asbestos Related Illnesses. https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/asbestos/diseases/
  31. Danziger & De Llano, LLP. Mesothelioma Lawyers. https://dandell.com/
  32. MesotheliomaAttorney.com. Mesothelioma Compensation Guide. https://mesotheliomaattorney.com/mesothelioma/compensation/
  33. Danziger & De Llano. How to File Mesothelioma Claims: A Step-by-Step Guide. https://dandell.com/mesothelioma/mesothelioma-compensation/filing-mesothelioma-claims-guide/
  34. 34.0 34.1 Mesothelioma.net. Mesothelioma Compensation Claims for Victims. https://mesothelioma.net/mesothelioma-asbestos-compensation-for-victims/
  35. Mesothelioma.net. Mesothelioma Trust Funds. https://mesothelioma.net/mesothelioma-asbestos-trust-funds/
  36. Danziger & De Llano. Mesothelioma Settlements. https://dandell.com/settlements/
  37. Mesothelioma Attorney Mesotheliomattorney.com. https://www.mesotheliomaattorney.com/

Cite error: <ref> tag with name "dandell-compensation" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.