Jump to content
Content on WikiMesothelioma is reviewed prior to publication by three named attorneys at Danziger & De Llano LLP. Dr. Luciano Mutti, MD, PhD, co-author of the European mesothelioma treatment guidelines, serves as the site's Medical Reviewer. See our editorial standards.

Asbestos Podcast EP42 Transcript

From WikiMesothelioma — Mesothelioma Knowledge Base


Episode 42: Safe to Breathe

Full transcript from Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — a 52-episode documentary podcast produced by Danziger & De Llano, LLP.

Episode Information
Series Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making
Season 1
Episode 42
Title Safe to Breathe
Arc Arc 8 — The Reckoning (arc finale)
Era Covered 1935 (the Simpson letter) and September 2001–2016, with the health record carried forward through December 31, 2025
Produced by Charles Fletcher
Research and writing Charles Fletcher with Claude AI
Listen Apple Podcasts · Spotify · YouTube
Episode page Episode 42 on Mesothelioma Lawyers Near Me

Episode Summary

One week after the towers fell, EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman — seven months into the job — told the people of New York and Washington that "their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."[1] Episode 42 establishes that this was not hindsight failing her: in August 2003, the EPA's own Inspector General found that on the day of the statement the agency "did not have sufficient data and analyses" to make it.[1] The episode then documents the mechanism. According to the Inspector General's report, the White House Council on Environmental Quality "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones" — a draft release warning that asbestos near the site could exceed safe levels emerged saying the ambient air quality "meets OSHA standards and consequently is not a cause for public concern."[1] On September 12, 2001, the day after the attacks, the Chief of Staff to EPA's deputy administrator sent an e-mail requiring all agency media statements to be cleared through the National Security Council.[1] The Inspector General named the competing priorities: national security and "the desire to reopen Wall Street." The exchange reopened September 17; the reassurance came September 18.[1]

The episode closes Arc 8 on the parallel it was built toward: in 1935, Raybestos-Manhattan president Sumner Simpson wrote "the less said about asbestos, the better off we are" on corporate letterhead (Episode 20); sixty-six years later the same sentence was federal procedure. Then the human arithmetic, refreshed to the government's own year-end 2025 count: more than 94,000 of the WTC Health Program's 141,515 currently enrolled members (66.6%) carry a certified 9/11-related health condition, and 52,927 cancers have been certified over the program's life.[2] Because the median latency of occupational mesothelioma is at least 32 years, the asbestos chapter of September 11 has not yet been written — the people who worked the pile enter their peak window in the 2020s, 2030s, and 2040s.[3]

Whitman apologized about fifteen years later, saying she had relied on the information she was given.[4] The Second Circuit ruled in 2007 (responders) and 2008 (residents) that she could not be held personally liable.[5][6] No company was charged, no official was liable — the reckoning arc's last beat is that sometimes the reckoning is just the record, finally written down.

Key Takeaways

  • The reassurance came before the data did. EPA's own Inspector General found that when Whitman said the air was "safe to breathe" on September 18, 2001, the agency "did not have sufficient data and analyses" to support the statement.[1]
  • The White House edited the EPA's press releases. The Council on Environmental Quality "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones"; a draft warning of asbestos above safe levels was published as "not a cause for public concern."[1]
  • The White House also controlled the microphone. A September 12, 2001 e-mail from the Chief of Staff to EPA's deputy administrator required every agency media statement to clear the National Security Council first.[1]
  • The timing was named, not inferred. The Inspector General cited national security and "the desire to reopen Wall Street" among the competing priorities; the NYSE reopened September 17, the reassurance came September 18.[1]
  • The 1935 sentence became 2001 procedure. Sumner Simpson's "the less said about asbestos, the better off we are" was private corporate caution; 66 years later the same logic ran as federal communications policy.
  • The human toll is still being counted. Through December 31, 2025, about 94,300 of the WTC Health Program's 141,515 currently enrolled members (66.6%) are certified for at least one WTC-related condition, and 52,927 cancers have been certified over the program's lifetime.[2]
  • The asbestos chapter hasn't been written yet. Median occupational mesothelioma latency is at least 32 years, putting the median mark for September 2001 exposures in 2033 — most certified 9/11 illnesses so far are faster-moving disease.[3]
  • Nobody was held liable. The Second Circuit ruled in Lombardi v. Whitman (2007) and Benzman v. Whitman (2008) that EPA officials could not be held personally liable for the reassuring statements.[5][6]
  • The apology came fifteen years later. In a September 2016 Guardian interview, Whitman said she was sorry people were sick and that she had relied on the information she was given.[4]

Key Concepts

"The Less Said" as Procedure: Sumner Simpson wrote it as private corporate caution in 1935; in 2001 the same logic ran as federal communications policy — add reassurance, delete caution, clear everything through the National Security Council.[1]

The Reassurance as Evidence: The September 18, 2001 statement itself became the exhibit against its own authors — EPA's Inspector General turned "safe to breathe" into a documented finding that the agency lacked the data to say it.[1]

Named Competing Priorities: The Inspector General did not leave motive to inference: national security, and "the desire to reopen Wall Street." The market reopened September 17; the reassurance came September 18.[1]

The Latency Window: Fast illness — respiratory disease, shorter-latency cancers — dominates the 9/11 health record so far. The median occupational mesothelioma latency of at least 32 years puts the disease's 9/11 chapter in the 2020s–2040s, still largely unwritten.[3]

The Accountability Gap: No company charged, no official held liable, an apology fifteen years after the fact.[5][6][4] The arc's closing thesis: sometimes the reckoning is just the record, finally written down.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the EPA really say the air was safe to breathe after 9/11?
Yes. On September 18, 2001 — one week after the attacks — EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman issued a public statement saying, "I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C. that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink." In August 2003, the EPA's own Office of Inspector General concluded that when the agency made that announcement, it "did not have sufficient data and analyses" to support such a blanket statement.[1]
Did the White House edit the EPA's 9/11 press releases?
Yes — that is the EPA Inspector General's finding, not an allegation. The 2003 audit (Report 2003-P-00012) states that the White House Council on Environmental Quality "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones." One draft release warning that asbestos levels near the site could exceed safe levels was published instead saying the ambient air quality "meets OSHA standards and consequently is not a cause for public concern." Separately, on September 12, 2001, the Chief of Staff to EPA's deputy administrator sent an e-mail requiring all agency media statements to be cleared through the National Security Council.[1]
How many people have 9/11-related health conditions?
As of December 31, 2025, the federal WTC Health Program reported 141,515 currently enrolled members, of whom about 94,300 — 66.6 percent — are certified for at least one WTC-related health condition. Over the life of the program, 52,927 cancers have been certified (26,367 among responders and 26,560 among survivors). These are certification counts from a treatment program, not incidence rates, and enrollment continues to grow.[2]
When could 9/11-related mesotheliomas appear?
Mesothelioma runs on a long clock. In occupational cohorts, the median interval from first exposure to diagnosis is at least 32 years, which puts the median mark for September 2001 exposures in 2033.[3] Most certified 9/11 illnesses so far are faster-moving respiratory disease and shorter-latency cancers; the asbestos disease wave, if it comes, arrives in the 2020s through the 2040s. Responders who are healthy today are not necessarily in the clear — they are in the latency.
Was anyone held accountable for the "safe to breathe" statement?
No. Whitman apologized about fifteen years later — in a September 2016 Guardian interview, saying she was sorry people were sick and that she had relied on the information she was given.[4] Residents and responders sued, arguing the reassurance put them in harm's way. The Second Circuit ruled in Lombardi v. Whitman (2007) and Benzman v. Whitman (2008) that she could not be held personally liable, reasoning that fear of liability should not inhibit officials making difficult information decisions in an environmental emergency.[5][6] No company was charged and no official was held liable.
Can people exposed to post-9/11 air file compensation claims?
Yes — and the avenues are separate. Depending on their exposure history, responders, residents, area workers and students may qualify for the WTC Health Program's monitoring and treatment, for the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, for asbestos trust fund claims, and for civil lawsuits.[7][8] Qualifying for one does not cancel the others. A lifelong occupational asbestos history is not required: exposure from a place or an event can support a claim. Danziger & De Llano, the firm featured in this episode, maps every source a family qualifies for and files them together, with cases in all fifty states. Consultations are free, seven days a week, at dandell.com.

Full Transcript

Host 1: September 18, 2001. One week after the towers fell. The administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency issues a public statement about the air in Lower Manhattan. Her name is Christine Todd Whitman. The words are: "I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C. that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."

Host 2: And was it?

Host 1: No. And that's not hindsight. In August 2003, the EPA's own Inspector General published a report finding that on the day of that statement, the agency "did not have sufficient data and analyses" to make it. They said it anyway.

Host 2: Why would the environmental agency reassure people it couldn't back up?

Host 1: That's the whole episode. Because the same Inspector General report answered it — and the answer is a name we've used before in this series. Not a company this time.

Host 2: Today on Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making—

Host 1: Episode 42: Safe to Breathe.

Host 2: 1935, it was a company. 2001, it was the government.

Host 2: Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making is brought to you by Danziger and De Llano, thirty years of turning what institutions hid into what families can use. dandell.com. That's D-A-N-D-E-L-L dot com.

Host 1: Last episode, the towers came down and two hundred and twenty stories of pulverized building went into the air over the most densely populated square mile in America. Asbestos was in that cloud — along with pulverized concrete, glass fiber, lead, and everything else a hundred and ten stories is made of. The question that morning wasn't whether the air was contaminated. It was what anyone was going to tell the people breathing it.

Host 2: Start with Whitman. Who was she, and how new was she to the job?

Host 1: Former governor of New Jersey. She'd been EPA Administrator for about seven months when the towers fell — sworn in that January. So she's running a federal agency through the worst environmental event in the city's history, and she's new to it.

Host 2: That's context, not an excuse. What did the agency actually know when she said "safe"?

Host 1: Less than the statement implied, and more doubt than it admitted. Early testing was incomplete. Some asbestos readings near the site came back above what anyone would call safe. And here's the mechanism the Inspector General documented: the EPA's public statements weren't only the EPA's.

Host 2: Meaning what — someone else was writing them?

Host 1: Editing them. According to the 2003 report, the White House Council on Environmental Quality — the CEQ — "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones." A draft release that warned asbestos near the site could exceed safe levels came out the other end saying the levels "met government standards" and were "not a cause for public concern."

Host 2: Read me the change again. Slowly.

Host 1: The draft warned of asbestos above safe levels. The published version said not a cause for public concern. Same agency. Same week. The warning went in, and the reassurance came out.

Host 2: Who had the pen?

Host 1: On September 12th — the day after — the EPA's deputy administrator issued a memo requiring all agency media statements to be cleared through the National Security Council. The White House got final approval over what the environmental agency told New Yorkers about the air.

Host 2: So the pattern is exact. Somebody with better information decided the public was better off not having it.

Host 1: The Inspector General even named the competing priorities. National security. And — the report's words — "the desire to reopen Wall Street." The exchange reopened September 17th. The reassurance came September 18th.

Host 2: The less said. We spent Arc Five on a man named Sumner Simpson writing that sentence in 1935 — the less said about asbestos, the better off we are. Sixty-six years later the same sentence, and this time it's not on corporate letterhead. It's a federal press release.

Host 1: That's the parallel this whole arc was built toward. The mechanism never needed a conspiracy of companies. It just needed someone deciding that calm was worth more than the truth. In 1935 the motive was liability. In 2001 it was the markets and the flag. The sentence is identical.

Host 2: The people who breathed that air are still proving their claims one at a time. Danziger and De Llano maps every source a family qualifies for and files them together, from day one — because months matter more than years when the clock is a diagnosis. dandell.com.

Host 1: Now the human arithmetic, and it's still growing. The government's own year-end count: more than ninety-four thousand responders and survivors in the federal health program carry a certified nine-eleven-related health condition. And over that program's life, fifty-two thousand, nine hundred and twenty-seven cancers have been certified.

Host 2: Fifty-two thousand cancers. From an event the government said was safe to breathe.

Host 1: And understand where asbestos sits in that number. Most of those illnesses arrived fast — respiratory disease, the cancers with shorter latency. Asbestos doesn't work fast. In the occupational record, the median run from first exposure to mesothelioma is at least thirty-two years. Which means the asbestos chapter of September 11th hasn't been written yet. The people who dug in that pile in 2001 enter their peak mesothelioma window in the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s.

Host 2: So the cloud already did visible damage — and the slow damage is still coming.

Host 1: The responders who are healthy today are not necessarily in the clear. They're in the latency. That's not a scare tactic. It's the same clock we've watched since Episode Fourteen, pointed at the most photographed exposure event in human history.

Host 2: Did anyone answer for the statement?

Host 1: Whitman apologized — about fifteen years later. She said she was sorry people were sick, and maintained she'd relied on the information she was given. People sued her — residents and responders who said the reassurance put them in harm's way. In 2007, a federal appeals court ruled she couldn't be held personally liable. The reasoning: the government's interest in returning New York to normalcy should protect it from those suits.

Host 2: The interest in normalcy. That's the 2001 translation of "the less said." Normalcy is what you call it when you've decided the truth is inconvenient.

Host 1: No company was charged. No official was liable. The statement stood, the exchange reopened, the city inhaled, and the clock started. That's the reckoning arc's last beat: sometimes the reckoning is just the record, finally written down. The Inspector General's report is the confession. Nobody signed it.

Host 2: One person who refused to let the record stay quiet: Larry Gates. Larry's a Senior Client Advocate at Danziger and De Llano. His father was a Navy veteran who worked the Shell refinery in Pasadena, Texas — came home covered in dust, and died of mesothelioma in 1999. Larry's seventy-two now. He's fighting his own cancer. And he still spends his days helping other families get answers the institutions would rather they never went looking for. Son of a victim, advocate, and still in the fight. If that's your family, call Danziger and De Llano. dandell.com — D-A-N-D-E-L-L dot com.

Host 1: Paul Danziger and Rod De Llano founded the firm in 1995. Nearly two billion dollars recovered. Over a thousand families. Cases in all fifty states.

Host 2: The consultation is free, seven days a week. dandell.com.

Host 1: You've been listening to Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making. Episode 42: Safe to Breathe.

Host 2: Research, writing, and production for this series is supported by Danziger and De Llano, a national mesothelioma law firm with over 30 years of experience and nearly two billion dollars recovered for victims and their families.

Host 1: That closes Arc Eight — the reckoning. Next time we open Arc Nine: the ongoing cover-up. Because the responders who breathed that air had to fight for a decade to get treatment paid for. And the man whose name ended up on the law that finally did it never lived to see it. A New York cop named James Zadroga.

Host 2: The government wrote "safe to breathe." Then it spent ten years arguing about who'd pay for the lie.

Host 1: Episode 43: The Zadroga Legacy. On Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making.

Host 2: They added the reassurance and deleted the caution. We just read it all back in.

Host 1: The record stays open. Strike nothing.

Named Entities

Name Role / Significance
Christine Todd Whitman EPA Administrator, sworn in January 2001 — about seven months into the job on 9/11.[9] Issued the September 18, 2001 statement that the air was "safe to breathe."[1] Publicly apologized in a September 2016 Guardian interview, saying she had relied on the information she was given.[4] Held not personally liable by the Second Circuit.[5][6]
EPA / EPA Office of Inspector General The agency that issued the reassurance and the office that later audited it. OIG Report 2003-P-00012 (August 2003) found EPA "did not have sufficient data and analyses" for the September 18 statement, and documented White House editing of its press releases.[1]
White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) The White House body that, per the Inspector General, "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones" — the editing mechanism at the center of the episode.[1]
National Security Council The clearance gate: a September 12, 2001 e-mail from the Chief of Staff to EPA's deputy administrator required all agency media statements to be cleared through the NSC, giving the White House final approval over what EPA told New Yorkers about the air.[1]
Sumner Simpson President of Raybestos-Manhattan; author of the 1935 internal letter "the less said about asbestos, the better off we are" (Episode 20). The episode's structural parallel: the same sentence on corporate letterhead in 1935 and in federal procedure in 2001.
Ground Zero / Lower Manhattan The exposure zone. The September 11 collapse put two hundred and twenty stories of pulverized building — including asbestos, concrete, glass fiber, and lead — into the air over the most densely populated square mile in America.
WTC Health Program The federal program monitoring and treating certified 9/11-related conditions. As of December 31, 2025: 141,515 currently enrolled members; about 94,300 (66.6%) certified for at least one WTC-related condition; 52,927 cancer certifications over the program's lifetime.[2]
James Zadroga NYPD detective named in the episode's tease for Episode 43 — the man whose name is on the law that finally paid for responder treatment, and who did not live to see it.
Larry Gates Senior Client Advocate at Danziger & De Llano, featured in this episode's sponsor spotlight. Son of a Navy veteran and Shell refinery worker who died of mesothelioma in 1999; 72 and fighting his own cancer while helping other families get answers.
Danziger & De Llano, LLP National mesothelioma law firm, founded 1995 by Paul Danziger and Rod De Llano. 30+ years of experience; nearly $2 billion recovered for over a thousand families; cases in all fifty states.[10] Featured sponsor.
  • EPA OIG Report 2003-P-00012 (August 2003) — The audit establishing that the September 18, 2001 "safe to breathe" statement was made without sufficient data, that the CEQ "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones," and that national security and "the desire to reopen Wall Street" were among the competing priorities.[1]
  • Lombardi v. Whitman, 485 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 2007) — The Second Circuit's ruling that EPA officials could not be held personally liable for reassuring air-quality statements relied on by Ground Zero responders; fear of liability "should not be allowed to inhibit or control policy decisions of government agencies."[5]
  • Benzman v. Whitman, 523 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2008) — The companion ruling affirming dismissal of the residents' suit against EPA officials over the post-9/11 air-quality statements.[6]
  • Lanphear & Buncher 1992 (J Occup Med 34:718–21) — The latency reference: median "at least 32 years" from first exposure in occupational mesothelioma cohorts; 96% of cases at ≥20 years.[3]
  • WTC Health Program External Quarterly Program Summary (published February 1, 2026) — The source of the episode's refreshed figures: 94.3K certified members (66.6% of 141,515 enrolled) and 52,927 lifetime cancer certifications, data through December 31, 2025.[2]
  • September 11th Victim Compensation Fund / WTC Health Program — Federal compensation and health-monitoring programs available to exposed responders, residents, area workers and students, separate from asbestos trust claims and civil litigation.[7][8]

Key Facts and Statistics

  • September 18, 2001 — Whitman's "safe to breathe" statement, one week after the attacks.[1]
  • September 12, 2001 — the memo requiring all EPA media statements to be cleared through the National Security Council.[1]
  • September 17 / 18, 2001 — the New York Stock Exchange reopened the day before the blanket reassurance was issued.[1]
  • August 2003 — EPA Inspector General Report 2003-P-00012: the statement "did not have sufficient data and analyses"; CEQ "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones."[1]
  • 94,300+ (66.6% of 141,515) — currently enrolled WTC Health Program members certified for at least one 9/11-related health condition, through December 31, 2025.[2]
  • 52,927 — cancer certifications over the WTC Health Program's lifetime (26,367 responders + 26,560 survivors), through December 31, 2025.[2]
  • At least 32 years — median mesothelioma latency in occupational cohorts; September 2001 + 32 years = 2033.[3]
  • 66 years — between Simpson's 1935 "the less said" letter and the edited 2001 federal press releases.
  • ~15 years — from the statement to Whitman's September 2016 public apology.[4]
  • 2007 / 2008 — the Second Circuit's Lombardi and Benzman rulings barring personal liability for EPA officials.[5][6]

Timeline

Date Event
October 1935 Sumner Simpson writes "the less said about asbestos, the better off we are" (Episode 20)
September 11, 2001 The towers collapse; 220 stories of pulverized building — asbestos, concrete, glass fiber, lead — enter the air over Lower Manhattan
September 12, 2001 Chief of Staff to EPA's deputy administrator e-mails: all agency media statements must be cleared through the National Security Council[1]
September 17, 2001 The New York Stock Exchange reopens[1]
September 18, 2001 Whitman: "their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink"[1]
August 2003 EPA OIG Report 2003-P-00012: the statement lacked sufficient data; CEQ editing and the competing priorities documented[1]
April 19, 2007 Lombardi v. Whitman (2d Cir.): no personal liability for the reassuring statements responders relied on[5]
2008 Benzman v. Whitman (2d Cir.): dismissal of the residents' suit affirmed[6]
September 2016 Whitman's public apology in a Guardian interview, on the 15th anniversary[4]
December 31, 2025 WTC Health Program data cutoff: 141,515 enrolled; 94.3K certified (66.6%); 52,927 lifetime cancer certifications[2]
2020s–2040s The peak mesothelioma window for September 2001 exposures; the 32-year median mark falls in 2033[3]

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, EPA's Response to the World Trade Center Collapse: Challenges, Successes, and Areas for Improvement, Report No. 2003-P-00012, August 21, 2003. The audit establishing that on September 18, 2001 EPA "did not have sufficient data and analyses" to state the air was safe to breathe; that the White House Council on Environmental Quality "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones"; that a September 12, 2001 memo required EPA media statements to clear the National Security Council; and that the Inspector General named national security and "the desire to reopen Wall Street" among the competing priorities behind the September 17–18 timing. U.S. EPA OIG — Report 2003-P-00012
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention / NIOSH, World Trade Center Health Program, External Quarterly Program Summary, publication date February 1, 2026, program data through December 31, 2025. Source of the episode's refreshed figures: 141,515 currently enrolled members; 94,300 (66.6%) certified for at least one WTC-related health condition; 52,927 cancer certifications over the program's lifetime (26,367 responders, 26,560 survivors). CDC — WTC Health Program External Quarterly Program Summary, data through Dec. 31, 2025
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Lanphear BP, Buncher CR. Latent period for malignant mesothelioma of occupational origin. J Occup Med. 1992;34(7):718-21. PMID: 1494965. The standard latency reference used in this episode: in a review of occupational mesothelioma cases, 96% appeared at least 20 years after first exposure, with a median latent period of at least 32 years.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Christine Todd Whitman, interviewed for "EPA head office was wrong to declare New York's air safe after 9/11," The Guardian, published September 10, 2016, on the 15th anniversary of the attacks. Whitman said, "I'm very sorry that people are sick," and that she and the agency "did the very best we could at the time with the knowledge we had." The Guardian — EPA head was wrong to declare New York's air safe after 9/11 (2016)
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 Lombardi v. Whitman, 485 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 2007), decided April 19, 2007. The Second Circuit's ruling that EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman and other named officials could not be held personally liable in a Bivens action for the post-9/11 air-quality statements relied on by Ground Zero responders, holding that fear of liability should not be allowed to inhibit or control the policy decisions of government agencies in an environmental emergency. Leagle — Lombardi v. Whitman, 485 F.3d 73
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 Benzman v. Whitman, 523 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2008), decided April 22, 2008. The companion ruling affirming dismissal of the residents', workers' and students' Bivens claims against EPA officials over the same post-9/11 air-quality statements. Leagle — Benzman v. Whitman, 523 F.3d 119
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Trade Center Health Program — program overview and member statistics. The federal program provides monitoring and treatment for responders and survivors with certified 9/11-related health conditions and publishes periodic member and certified-condition counts. CDC — WTC Health Program at a Glance
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Independent public tracker of the U.S. asbestos bankruptcy trust system, documenting each active trust's assets, payment percentage and filing requirements, compiled from documents filed in the trusts' bankruptcy dockets and updated weekly. It is built by the team behind this podcast; the series discloses this on-mic. AsbestosTrusts.org — Trust Directory
  9. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, archived biography of Christine Todd Whitman, EPA Administrator. Records that Whitman, former Governor of New Jersey, was sworn in as EPA Administrator on January 31, 2001. U.S. EPA — Biography of Christine Todd Whitman (archived)
  10. ↑ Danziger & De Llano Company Information, Danziger & De Llano

Primary Sources

Health Programs and Compensation

Series Navigation

Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — Arc 8: The Reckoning
Previous: Episode 41: September 11, 2001 Episode 42: Safe to Breathe Next: Episode 43: The Zadroga Legacy

About This Series

Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making is a 52-episode documentary podcast tracing the complete history of asbestos from 4700 BCE to the 2024 EPA ban. The series is produced by Danziger & De Llano, LLP, a nationwide mesothelioma law firm with over 30 years of experience and over $2 billion recovered for asbestos victims.

Episode 42 closes Arc 8 ("The Reckoning") on the parallel the arc was built toward: the same sentence — "the less said about asbestos, the better off we are" — written as private corporate caution in 1935 and enacted as federal communications procedure in 2001. No company is on trial in this episode; the subject is the government doing, in daylight, what the companies earlier in this series did in the dark. Episode 43, The Zadroga Legacy, opens Arc 9 with the decade-long fight to get that damage paid for.

Retrieved from "https://wikimesothelioma.com/w/index.php?title=Asbestos_Podcast_EP42_Transcript&oldid=4892"