Jump to content
Content on WikiMesothelioma is reviewed by three named attorneys at Danziger & De Llano LLP prior to publication. See our editorial standards.

Asbestos Podcast EP31 Transcript

From WikiMesothelioma — Mesothelioma Knowledge Base


Episode 31: The Conference That Changed Everything

Full transcript from Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — a 52-episode documentary podcast produced by Danziger & De Llano, LLP.

Episode Information
Series Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making
Season 1
Episode 31
Title The Conference That Changed Everything
Arc Arc 7 — The Truth Emerges (Episode 2 of 5)
Period covered 1964–1970
Produced by Charles Fletcher
Research and writing Charles Fletcher with Claude AI
Listen Apple Podcasts · Spotify · YouTube

Episode Summary

October 19th, 1964. The proof was already in the room — 339 of 392 insulation workers showing X-ray evidence of asbestosis, lung cancer at seven times the expected rate, ten mesotheliomas — when the Asbestos Textile Institute's legal team began drafting warning letters to the New York Academy of Sciences. Before the conference ended. ATI minutes document that member companies' "protests and threats successfully prevented the distribution of press releases." One New York Times article. Then silence.

Episode 31 covers what happened in the six years between Selikoff's proof and OSHA. It is not a story about regulatory delay by oversight — it is a story about a doubt machine with a name and a Philadelphia address. In 1966, the ATI created the Information Center on Asbestos: a coordinated effort to challenge Selikoff's methodology, fund counter-research, and delay any enforceable federal standard. Every tactic tobacco would later make famous — asbestos ran it first. In the gap: 3.4 million Americans being assigned to Navy ships and military bases with no enforceable standards. OSHA was signed December 29, 1970. First asbestos standard: 12 fibers per cubic centimeter. Selikoff said it was still ten times too high.

Key Takeaways

  • Suppression started before the conference ended. ATI minutes document that member companies' "protests and threats successfully prevented the distribution of press releases at the historic asbestos conference." ATI lawyers sent warning letters to NYAS and Selikoff personally. One Times article. Not an oversight — an operation.[1]
  • The doubt machine had a name and an address. Information Center on Asbestos, Philadelphia, 1966. Created by ATI. Mission: challenge Selikoff's methodology, commission industry-friendly research, delay regulation. Every playbook tobacco would later make famous — asbestos ran it first.[2]
  • They attacked the man when the data held. 339/392 couldn't be disputed. A 1965 Owens-Corning Fiberglas memo sought "to find some way of preventing Dr. Selikoff from creating problems and affecting sales." An ATI representative called him a "disturbing sore thumb."[3]
  • The regulatory architecture had no floor. Before OSHA: voluntary compliance, state workers' compensation, Walsh-Healey (federal contractors only). The asbestos industry understood exactly what that absence meant — every year without a standard was another year no law was broken.[4]
  • The ACGIH standard was already industry-captured. 1964 TLV: 5 million particles per cubic foot. Industry representatives sat on the committees that set it. Conflict of interest was structural, not incidental.[5]
  • The evidence base kept growing anyway. From 632 workers at the 1964 conference to 17,800 tracked by the late 1960s. The mortality gap wasn't narrowing — it was widening. Selikoff called it the "asbestos cancer wave" that could not be recalled.[6]
  • Six years. First standard still wrong. OSHA signed December 29, 1970. First asbestos standard: 12 f/cc (1971). Selikoff: ten times too high. 12 → 5 (1972) → 2 (1976) → 0.2 (1986) → 0.1 today — 99% reduction over 23 years from a number that was already wrong.[7]
  • Gulf of Tonkin, 63 days before. August 7, 1964. The manufacturers who attended the October 1964 conference kept supplying the military for the next decade. After October 1964, no good-faith claim of ignorance remained.[8]

Full Transcript

Cold Open

Host 1: December 29th, 1970. A Tuesday. The White House. President Richard Nixon signs the Occupational Safety and Health Act into law. For the first time in American history, the federal government has a mandate to protect workers from dangerous conditions on the job. OSHA is born.

Host 2: Six years after Selikoff's conference.

Host 1: Six years, two months, and eight days after four hundred scientists heard irrefutable proof that asbestos killed workers. OSHA's first asbestos standard arrived in 1971: twelve fibers per cubic centimeter.

Host 2: What was Selikoff's response?

Host 1: He said it was ten times too high.

Host 2: Still too high.

Host 1: The standard dropped to five fibers in 1972. Then two in 1976. Then 0.2 in 1986. Today it's 0.1 — a ninety-nine percent reduction from where they started.

Host 2: Today on Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making —

Host 1: Episode 31: The Conference That Changed Everything.

Host 2: What changed. What didn't. And the six years in between.

★ SPONSOR BREAK 1 — Danziger & De Llano: "thirty years of turning corporate records into family justice." dandell.com

The Suppression That Started Before the Conference Ended

Host 1: Last episode, we stood in the New York Academy of Sciences conference room. October 19th, 1964. We watched Dr. Irving Selikoff present data that could not be dismissed. Three hundred thirty-nine of three hundred ninety-two insulation workers showed X-ray evidence of asbestosis. Seven times the expected lung cancer rate. Four hundred scientists in the room.

Host 2: And the industry was in that room too.

Host 1: Every major asbestos manufacturer was represented. The Asbestos Textile Institute. Johns-Manville. Raybestos-Manhattan. H.K. Porter. They heard the same data. And while the scientists were still presenting, the ATI legal team was already drafting their response.

Host 2: What kind of response?

Host 1: Warning letters. To the New York Academy of Sciences. To Selikoff personally. About "damaging and misleading news stories." The ATI minutes record that member companies' "protests and threats successfully prevented the distribution of press releases at the historic asbestos conference."

Host 2: At the conference itself. While it was happening.

Host 1: They suppressed the press release before the last session ended. One New York Times article covered the findings. And then — nothing. For two months. Six months. A year.

Host 2: Because the conference proved the science. But it didn't create any regulation.

Host 1: No OSHA in 1964. The Occupational Safety and Health Act wouldn't exist for six more years. The federal government had no general mandate to regulate workplace safety. Specific industries had specific rules. Mining had the Federal Mine Safety Code. Certain federal contractors fell under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act. But the average industrial worker?

Host 2: What protection did they have?

Host 1: Voluntary compliance. State workers' compensation. The goodwill of their employer. That was it. And the asbestos industry knew exactly what that absence of law meant.

Host 2: They used that vacuum.

Host 1: By filling it. In 1966, the Asbestos Textile Institute created the "Information Center on Asbestos." Headquarters: Philadelphia. Mission: coordinate the industry's scientific and public relations response to the growing body of evidence against them.

Host 2: What did that actually look like in practice?

Host 1: Funded research designed to create doubt. Challenges to Selikoff's methodology. Disputes about dose-response models. Medical studies commissioned to identify supposedly safe exposure levels — when Selikoff's data showed no demonstrably safe level had been established. Every playbook that tobacco would later make famous? Asbestos was running it first.

Host 2: What about the agencies actually setting standards?

Host 1: The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists — the ACGIH — set threshold limit values. In 1964, their asbestos TLV was five million particles per cubic foot. Selikoff's data suggested that was still killing workers. But who sat on the committees that set those values?

Host 2: Industry representatives.

Host 1: Conflict of interest was built into the architecture. And when calls came to lower the standard, the industry's response was well-rehearsed: the science is inconclusive, more study is needed, economic disruption would follow any rash action.

Host 2: While workers kept breathing it.

Host 1: December 1965. Fourteen months after the conference. The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published the conference proceedings. Seven hundred pages. Volume 132, Issue 1.[9] The first permanent, publicly available, peer-reviewed scientific record of what asbestos was doing to workers.

Host 2: So the documentation was public — what was the industry's next move?

Host 1: Attack the messenger. Selikoff's non-traditional medical education — the Glasgow path forced on him by anti-Semitic quotas at American medical schools — was weaponized. Critics claimed he "faked his medical degree." Industry representatives called him a union tool. A 1965 memo from Owens-Corning Fiberglas sought "to find some way of preventing Dr. Selikoff from creating problems and affecting sales." An ATI representative described him as a "disturbing sore thumb."

Host 2: They couldn't dispute the numbers.

Host 1: 339 of 392. Seven times the lung cancer rate. Those are facts. So they attacked the man who counted them.

★ SPONSOR BREAK 2 — Danziger & De Llano: "thirty years finding the documentation companies thought they'd hidden. The exposure records. The internal memos. The reports they commissioned and suppressed." dandell.com

The Evidence Keeps Growing

Host 1: While the industry fought the science, Selikoff expanded the study. The original cohort was 632 insulation workers. By the late 1960s, he was tracking 17,800 workers — one of the largest occupational health studies ever conducted.

Host 2: What did the larger dataset show?

Host 1: Everything the smaller one showed, amplified. The mortality gap between insulation workers and the general population wasn't narrowing. It was widening. Workers who had entered the trade in the late 1930s and early 1940s — the WWII shipyard generation — were now entering the cancer years.

Host 2: The latency period catching up.

Host 1: Selikoff called it the "asbestos cancer wave" that had already been set in motion and could not be recalled. For those workers, the damage was done.

Host 2: But what did the six-year delay mean for new workers?

Host 1: Every year without enforceable standards was another year of new exposures. New workers entering the trade. New fibers in new lungs with no warning of what they were breathing. And it wasn't just factory workers.

Host 2: The servicemembers.

Host 1: August 7th, 1964. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Sixty-three days before Selikoff's conference. The manufacturers who attended that conference — who received the proof, who funded the Information Center on Asbestos, who sent the warning letters — those same manufacturers were supplying every Navy ship, every aircraft, every base being built for the Vietnam theater.

Host 2: With full knowledge. After October 1964.

Host 1: There was no longer any good-faith claim of ignorance. The 700-page proceedings were in the scientific literature. The data was public. The manufacturers had been in the room when it was presented. And they kept shipping.

Host 2: What finally created OSHA?

Host 1: Labor. By the late 1960s, the labor movement had pushed occupational safety onto the legislative agenda. The United Mine Workers, after a series of disasters. The United Auto Workers. The AFL-CIO. Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas introduced the first comprehensive occupational safety bill in 1968. It failed. The Nixon administration negotiated a version that passed both chambers. December 29th, 1970.

Host 2: Why did Nixon sign it?

Host 1: Political calculation — the bill had enough labor support that a veto looked costly heading into reelection. But the more important question is why it took six years from Selikoff's proof to any federal standard at all.

Host 2: Because the industry used those six years.

Host 1: Every year without a federal standard was another year the industry could argue: no law is broken, no violation exists, no liability attaches. The standard-setting process itself — slow, contested, technically complex — was a weapon against regulation. You can tie up a standard for years debating methodology while workers continue to be exposed.

Host 2: The conference that changed everything.

Host 1: Changed the scientific record. Changed almost nothing in the factory. Not until 1971. And even then, Selikoff said the first standard was still ten times too high.

Host 2: Proof in 1964. First standard in 1971. Still wrong.

Host 1: And in those seven years, 3.4 million Americans were being assigned to Navy ships and military bases equipped with the same material. The conference that changed everything — didn't change what was happening below decks.

Host 2: Next time.

Host 1: Episode 32: The Invisible Enemy Within. The boiler rooms. The temperatures. The vibrations from the guns that shook asbestos insulation loose in sailors' sleeping quarters. And Walter Twidwell — Navy boiler tender, seven ships, twenty years, a miniature dachshund named Hiram, and a jury that needed less than two hours.

★ SPONSOR BREAK 3 (B3: Navairre) — Navairre, diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma at 28. No known exposure source. Two-year prognosis. One of the first HIPEC patients — hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy — before the procedure was widely available. Survived 20+ years. Still working. Still advocating. When you call Danziger & De Llano, you're talking to people who understand the diagnosis is not the final word. Over a thousand families helped. Nearly two billion dollars recovered. dandell.com

Host 1: You've been listening to Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — Episode 31: The Conference That Changed Everything.

Host 2: Research, writing, and production for this series is supported by Danziger & De Llano, a national mesothelioma law firm with over thirty years of experience and nearly two billion dollars recovered for victims and their families.

Host 1: If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, don't navigate it alone. Visit dandell.com.

Host 2: Next time — the Invisible Enemy Within.

Host 1: Thank you for listening.

Host 2: Thank you for listening.

Post-Credits Banter (Off-Mic)

Host 2: The Information Center on Asbestos. Philadelphia. 1966.

Host 1: While Selikoff was expanding to seventeen thousand workers.

Host 2: Funded doubt.

Host 1: It worked for six years.

Host 2: Seven years.

Host 1: Six years to OSHA. Then the standard was still wrong.

Host 2: Ten times too high.

Host 1: He said that immediately.

Host 2: The conference that changed everything — took another decade to change the law.

Host 1: Long game. Always the long game.

Host 2: At least Navairre's still here.

Host 1: Twenty-plus years past a two-year prognosis. The statistics don't decide.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Information Center on Asbestos and what did it do?

The Information Center on Asbestos was created by the Asbestos Textile Institute in 1966, headquartered in Philadelphia. Its stated mission was to coordinate the asbestos industry's scientific and public relations response to Selikoff's findings. In practice, it funded research designed to challenge Selikoff's dose-response methodology, commissioned studies to identify allegedly "safe" exposure thresholds, and maintained the appearance of scientific controversy where none substantively existed. Every tactic the tobacco industry would later make famous — manufactured doubt, industry-funded counter-research, attacks on researchers' methodology — the asbestos industry ran first, with the Information Center on Asbestos as the institutional mechanism.[2]

Why did it take six years from Selikoff's proof to OSHA?

There was no federal framework covering average industrial workers before OSHA. Pre-1970, workers had only voluntary employer compliance, state workers' compensation, and the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act (federal contractors only). Standard-setting bodies like the ACGIH had industry representatives on their committees. The Information Center on Asbestos used every procedural and scientific tool available to delay enforceable standards. Senator Ralph Yarborough (D-TX) introduced the first comprehensive occupational safety bill in 1968 — it failed. A Nixon-negotiated version passed in 1970. The delay was not procedural uncertainty — the science was settled in October 1964. The delay was deliberate.[4][10]

What was OSHA's first asbestos standard, and was it adequate?

OSHA's first asbestos permissible exposure limit, set in 1971, was 12 fibers per cubic centimeter. Selikoff stated publicly and immediately that it was still ten times too high. The standard was reduced repeatedly: 12 f/cc (1971) → 5 (1972) → 2 (1976) → 0.2 (1986) → 0.1 today — a 99 percent reduction over 23 years from a starting level that was itself far too high. The EPA issued a final rule banning chrysotile asbestos in 2024, sixty years after Selikoff's NYAS conference.[7]

How did the industry attack Selikoff's research after the 1964 conference?

The initial strategy was suppression: ATI warning letters to NYAS and to Selikoff personally, suppression of conference press releases, discouragement of media coverage. When the scientific record became too large to suppress — the Annals of the NYAS proceedings published December 1965, 700 pages, peer-reviewed — the strategy shifted to attacking the man. A 1965 Owens-Corning Fiberglas memo sought "to find some way of preventing Dr. Selikoff from creating problems and affecting sales." Industry representatives targeted his non-traditional Glasgow medical education (forced on him by antisemitic quotas at U.S. medical schools) and his union associations. In 2003, a British historian funded by Turner and Newall published an article attacking Selikoff's credentials. Eight researchers from Brown, Manchester, RMIT, and Mount Sinai published a rebuttal: "little more than an ad hominem attack." AJRCCM 2013: "The insulator mortality data stand undiminished by the test of time."[1][3]

How large did Selikoff's research expand after 1964?

The original 1964 presentation covered a clinical cohort of 1,522 insulation workers (examined cross-sectionally) and a separate mortality cohort of 632. By the late 1960s, Selikoff had expanded the mortality study to 17,800 workers — one of the largest occupational health studies ever conducted at that time. The mortality gap between insulation workers and the general population was not narrowing as the industry's "safe exposure" argument implied it should. It was widening. Selikoff described the result as an "asbestos cancer wave" that had been set in motion and could not be recalled.[6]

What was the ACGIH's role in asbestos standard-setting, and why was it compromised?

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) set threshold limit values for workplace hazards. Its 1964 asbestos TLV was five million particles per cubic foot. Selikoff's data indicated workers were developing asbestosis and dying of lung cancer at levels the ACGIH considered permissible. The ACGIH's committees included industry representatives — creating a structural conflict of interest in which the industries producing and using asbestos participated in setting the exposure standards to which they were subject. The Information Center on Asbestos used this process actively: challenging Selikoff's dose-response models in technical forums, commissioning studies to justify existing standards, and contesting any proposed reductions.[5]

Why does the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution matter to the asbestos story?

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution passed August 7, 1964 — sixty-three days before Selikoff's NYAS conference. It authorized the military escalation that became the Vietnam War. Every Navy ship, military aircraft, and base built for the Vietnam theater was constructed with asbestos insulation, pipe lagging, and fireproofing. 3.4 million Americans served in the Vietnam theater. Peak U.S. asbestos consumption — 803,000 metric tons — was recorded in 1973. The manufacturers who attended the October 1964 conference and received Selikoff's proof continued supplying the military for the next decade. After October 19th, 1964, no good-faith claim of ignorance about asbestos's effects remained available to the manufacturers who supplied those ships and bases.[8]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Asbestos Textile Institute meeting minutes recording that member companies' "protests and threats successfully prevented the distribution of press releases at the historic asbestos conference," October 1964. ATI warning letters to the New York Academy of Sciences and to Dr. Irving Selikoff personally regarding "damaging and misleading news stories."
  2. 2.0 2.1 Information Center on Asbestos, created 1966 by the Asbestos Textile Institute, headquartered in Philadelphia. Created to coordinate scientific and public relations response to evidence against asbestos. Funded doubt, challenged Selikoff's methodology, commissioned industry-friendly research.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation internal memorandum, 1965, seeking "to find some way of preventing Dr. Selikoff from creating problems and affecting sales." ATI representative characterizing Selikoff as a "disturbing sore thumb."
  4. 4.0 4.1 Pre-OSHA regulatory landscape for average industrial workers: voluntary employer compliance; state workers' compensation statutes (highly variable); Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act (federal contractors only, 1936). No federal general-mandate workplace safety authority prior to the Occupational Safety and Health Act, signed December 29, 1970 (Pub. L. 91-596).
  5. 5.0 5.1 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), asbestos threshold limit value (TLV) in 1964: 5 million particles per cubic foot. Industry representatives participated in ACGIH standard-setting committees. Conflict of interest was structural.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Selikoff, I.J., Hammond, E.C., Seidman, H. (1979). Mortality experience of insulation workers in the United States and Canada, 1943–1976. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 330, 91–116. Expanded cohort of 17,800 insulation workers; mortality gap widening, not narrowing.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Occupational Safety and Health Act signed December 29, 1970 (Pub. L. 91-596). First OSHA asbestos permissible exposure limit: 12 fibers per cubic centimeter (1971). Standard reduction history: 12 f/cc (1971) → 5 (1972) → 2 (1976) → 0.2 (1986) → 0.1 (current). EPA chrysotile asbestos ban: 40 CFR Part 751, effective 2024.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, Pub. L. 88-408, August 7, 1964 (Senate 88–2; House 414–0). Vietnam-era U.S. troop deployment: approximately 3.4 million Americans in theater. Peak U.S. asbestos consumption: 803,000 metric tons in 1973 (USGS Circular 1298, Virta 2006).
  9. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 132, Issue 1, December 31, 1965. Conference proceedings from the October 19–21, 1964 NYAS conference "Biological Effects of Asbestos." 700 pages. First permanent, publicly available, peer-reviewed scientific record of asbestos's effects on workers.
  10. Senator Ralph Yarborough (D-TX) introduced the first comprehensive occupational safety bill in 1968. The bill failed. The Nixon administration negotiated a version that passed both chambers of Congress in 1970. Nixon signed the Occupational Safety and Health Act December 29, 1970.

Episode Navigation

EP30: Selikoff's Warning All Transcripts EP32: The Invisible Enemy Within →