MesotheliomaSupport: Add Episode 19 transcript page

2026-03-10T22:32:43Z

Add Episode 19 transcript page

New page

{{#seo:
|title=Episode 19: Two Prosecutions - Asbestos Podcast Transcript
|description=Full transcript of Episode 19 from Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making. The 1931 Asbestos Industry Regulations, industry-dominated drafting, and the myth of workplace enforcement.
|keywords=asbestos podcast transcript, episode 19, two prosecutions, 1931 regulations, asbestos industry regulations, workplace enforcement, prosecution myth
}}

= Episode 19: Two Prosecutions =

''Full transcript from '''Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making''' — a 52-episode documentary podcast produced by [https://dandell.com Danziger & De Llano, LLP].''

{| style="width:100%; border:2px solid #1a5276; border-radius:4px; margin:1em 0;"
|-
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white; padding:10px; text-align:left;" colspan="2" | Episode Information
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold; width:30%;" | Series
| style="padding:8px;" | Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Season
| style="padding:8px;" | 1
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Episode
| style="padding:8px;" | 19
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Title
| style="padding:8px;" | Two Prosecutions
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Arc
| style="padding:8px;" | Arc 4 — The Warnings Ignored (Episode 5 of 5 — Arc Finale)
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Produced by
| style="padding:8px;" | Charles Fletcher
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Research and writing
| style="padding:8px;" | Charles Fletcher with Claude AI
|-
| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" | Listen
| style="padding:8px;" | [https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1860289539 Apple Podcasts] · [https://open.spotify.com/show/3RuKIhjlTIyldks82KBYR5 Spotify] · [https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/63d82924-99cb-4ea6-9708-4a5bd6fdfccf/ Amazon Music]
|}

== Episode Summary ==

In 1931, Britain enacted the Asbestos Industry Regulations — the world's first workplace regulations specifically targeting asbestos exposure.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" /> The regulatory process itself exposed the compromise between government protection and industry cost: when Parliament convened a drafting conference in July 1930, six government factory inspectors faced seven industry representatives, with workers entirely excluded from the deliberations.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" /> The sub-committee writing the actual regulations gave industry a three-to-two majority over government inspectors. Industry raised three objections during drafting — medical examinations were too expensive, respirator requirements were impractical because workers wouldn't wear them, and restrictions on young workers would eliminate cheap labor.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" /> Rather than adopting Merewether's proposed numerical dust limits, the regulations employed a qualitative "dust datum," defined as conditions "arising from flyer spinning carried out without exhaust under good general conditions."<ref name="tweedale_prosecution" /> Modern reconstruction estimates this standard translated to approximately 20 fibers per milliliter of personal exposure — roughly 200 times today's permissible exposure limit of 0.1 fibers per milliliter.<ref name="merewether_report" /> Enforcement was virtually nonexistent. The widely-cited claim that only two prosecutions occurred under these regulations between 1931 and 1968 is a historical myth that obscures three conflicting accounts: Tweedale and Bartrip document 1935-1936 conviction data (five charges, four convictions), Wikeley records circa 1964 prosecutions including Central Asbestos Company in Bermondsey (£170 in fines), and Dalton's 1979 account conflated these into the "two prosecutions" soundbite repeated ever since.<ref name="tweedale_prosecution" /><ref name="wikeley_prosecution" /> UK asbestos production increased 60% in the decade after the regulations were enacted — from 250,000 tons in 1930 to 400,000 tons by 1940 — indicating the regulatory framework posed no meaningful economic constraint on industry expansion.

== Key Takeaways ==

{| style="width:100%; border:2px solid #1a5276; border-left:5px solid #1a5276; border-radius:4px; margin:1em 0;"
|-
| style="padding:15px;" |
* '''The 1931 Regulations Were Written by Industry.''' When Parliament convened a conference on July 8, 1930 to draft the world's first asbestos workplace regulations, six government factory inspectors sat across from seven industry representatives. The sub-committee writing the actual regulations gave industry a three-to-two majority. Workers, trade unions, and independent medical experts were entirely excluded.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" />
* '''Industry Objections Prioritized Cost Over Safety.''' Industry raised three objections: medical examinations were too expensive, respirator requirements were impractical because workers wouldn't wear them, and restrictions on young workers would eliminate cheap labor. Every objection concerned cost; none addressed whether the protections would actually work.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" />
* '''The Dust Datum Was 200 Times Today's Safe Limit.''' Instead of adopting numerical dust limits, the regulations used a qualitative "dust datum" roughly 200 times today's permissible exposure limit — approximately 20 fibers per milliliter versus the modern standard of 0.1 fibers per milliliter.<ref name="merewether_report" />
* '''The Regulations Excluded Most Exposed Workers.''' Coverage was restricted to "scheduled areas" in specific factories. Excluded were laggers, construction workers, shipyard workers, brake and clutch workers, automotive workers, anyone working fewer than eight hours per week with asbestos, and all workers using asbestos products rather than manufacturing them.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" />
* '''The "Two Prosecutions" Claim Is Demonstrably Wrong.''' Three separate, conflicting accounts exist: Tweedale/Bartrip (1935-1936 cases), Wikeley (1964 cases), and Dalton (1979 conflation). The real total is likely three to four distinct prosecution events, not two.<ref name="tweedale_prosecution" /><ref name="wikeley_prosecution" /><ref name="dalton_source" />
* '''Company Two Cannot Be Identified.''' Wikeley's account records two firms prosecuted circa 1964 — Central Asbestos Company (£170) and an unnamed second company (£50). The physical Annual Reports remain undigitized at the National Archives, and four AI research models searching 200+ sources could not identify the second firm.<ref name="wikeley_prosecution" />
* '''Arthur Greensmith's Case Demonstrates Enforcement Failure.''' A carder at J.W. Roberts in Armley, Leeds, diagnosed with asbestosis in 1939, Greensmith was never properly removed from hazardous work despite regulatory requirements for suspension. He died within months of leaving employment in August 1943. J.W. Roberts later admitted they had "no realistic defence" to regulatory violations from at least 1950 onward.<ref name="greensmith_case" />
* '''UK Asbestos Production Surged Despite Regulation.''' Production increased 60% in the decade after the 1931 regulations — from 250,000 tons in 1930 to 400,000 tons by 1940 — demonstrating the regulatory framework posed no meaningful economic constraint on industry expansion.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" />
|}

== Key Concepts ==

=== The Dust Datum and Unmeasurable Standards ===

The Asbestos Industry Regulations of 1931 rejected Merewether's proposed numerical dust limits in favor of a qualitative "dust datum" — a subjective standard rather than a measurable threshold. The datum was defined as conditions "arising from flyer spinning carried out without exhaust under good general conditions."<ref name="merewether_report" /> Modern reconstruction estimates this corresponded to approximately 20 fibers per milliliter of personal exposure. Today's permissible exposure limit is 0.1 fibers per milliliter, making the 1931 standard roughly 200 times what contemporary occupational health standards consider safe. This shift from quantifiable limits to qualitative language eliminated objective grounds for enforcement and allowed companies to claim compliance with unmeasurable standards.

=== The Three Conflicting Prosecution Accounts ===

The widely-cited claim that only "two prosecutions" occurred under the 1931 regulations between 1931 and 1968 is a conflation of three distinct historical accounts. '''Account A''' (Tweedale and Bartrip) documents two conviction-years in 1935 and 1936 with five charges and four convictions, averaging £12 per conviction (£8 in 1935, £15 in 1936).<ref name="tweedale_prosecution" /> '''Account B''' (Wikeley, 1992) records two firms prosecuted circa 1964 — Central Asbestos Company in Bermondsey (three counts, £170) and an unnamed Company Two (one count, £50).<ref name="wikeley_prosecution" /> '''Account C''' (Dalton, 1979, repeated by subsequent scholars) conflates Accounts A and B into the single soundbite that "only two prosecutions" occurred, erasing the 1935-1936 cases entirely. The real total across 35 years is likely three to four distinct prosecution events, but the myth has persisted for over fifty years because no one checked the underlying arithmetic.

=== Industry-Dominated Regulatory Drafting ===

The regulatory process that produced the 1931 Asbestos Industry Regulations was structured to favor industry interests. The initial conference convened on July 8, 1930, consisted of six government factory inspectors and seven industry representatives — a seven-to-six industry majority on the full body.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" /> The sub-committee responsible for drafting the actual regulations contained three industry representatives and only two government inspectors, giving industry a three-to-two controlling majority over the officials charged with protecting workers. Workers, trade unions, and independent medical experts — despite the disease being medically documented by Merewether — were entirely excluded from the drafting process. Industry objections to medical examinations (expense), respirators (impracticality), and age restrictions (loss of cheap labor) were all cost-based, and all prevailed.

=== Regulatory Exclusions and Affected Populations ===

The 1931 regulations covered only workers in "scheduled areas" — specific manufacturing processes in registered factories — while excluding the vast majority of people exposed to asbestos. Explicitly excluded were laggers (insulators), construction workers, shipyard workers, brake and clutch workers, automotive workers, anyone working fewer than eight hours per week with asbestos, and all workers using asbestos products rather than manufacturing them.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" /> The 1921 Census counted 3,762 people in asbestos manufacturing; this narrow population received some regulatory protection. By World War Two, 4.5 million American shipyard workers handled asbestos daily with no comparable regulatory protection. This exclusionary design meant that the regulations existed primarily to satisfy political demands for action while covering only a small fraction of the exposed workforce.

== Named Entities ==

=== Historical Figures ===

{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|-
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Individual
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Role/Affiliation
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Significance
|-
| '''Duncan Wilson''' || Government official || Sent June 19, 1930 letter launching the 1931 regulatory process
|-
| '''Edward Merewether''' || Government physician || Co-author of the Merewether Report; recommended numerical dust limits (superseded by qualitative "dust datum")
|-
| '''Charles W. Price''' || Engineering Inspector of Factories || Merewether Report co-author; served on the drafting sub-committee
|-
| '''Arthur Greensmith''' || Carder, J.W. Roberts, Armley, Leeds || Diagnosed with asbestosis 1939; died within months of leaving work in August 1943 despite regulatory protections
|-
| '''Robert Turner''' || Turner Brothers executive || Reportedly proposed removing asbestos from the dangerous occupations schedule in 1932 (one year post-regulation)
|-
| '''Geoffrey Tweedale''' || Historian || Source for Account A prosecution data (Table 9.1, citing Factory Inspector Annual Reports)
|-
| '''Peter Bartrip''' || Historian || Provided prosecution breakdown for 1935-1936 cases (five charges, four convictions)
|-
| '''Nigel Wikeley''' || Legal scholar || Source for Account B prosecution data (1992, footnote 54)
|-
| '''Andrew Dalton''' || Historian || 1979 source for Account C conflation ("two prosecutions" soundbite)
|}

=== Organizations and Companies ===

* '''Turner Brothers''' — Major asbestos manufacturer, Rochdale; Robert Turner an executive.<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931" />
* '''J.W. Roberts''' — Asbestos manufacturer, Armley, Leeds; employed Arthur Greensmith; admitted internal memo that they had "no realistic defence" to regulatory violations from at least 1950 onward.<ref name="greensmith_case" />
* '''Central Asbestos Company''' — Bermondsey, London; prosecuted April 1964 under Asbestos Industry Regulations (three counts, £170 fine, cited by Wikeley).<ref name="wikeley_prosecution" />
* '''Environmental and Equality Alliance''' — Repeated the "two prosecutions" myth in 2002, perpetuating Dalton's conflation.<ref name="dalton_source" />
* '''Danziger & De Llano, LLP''' — Nationwide mesothelioma law firm producing this podcast series; recovered nearly $2 billion for families affected by asbestos exposure over 30+ years.<ref name="dandell_firm" />

=== Locations ===

* '''Rochdale''' — Turner Brothers asbestos manufacturing headquarters
* '''Armley, Leeds''' — J.W. Roberts factory location, Arthur Greensmith's workplace
* '''Bermondsey, London''' — Central Asbestos Company location, site of April 1964 prosecution
* '''National Archives''' — Repository of undigitized Factory Inspector Annual Reports containing prosecution records

== Timeline ==

{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|-
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Date
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Event
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Significance
|-
| '''June 19, 1930''' || Duncan Wilson sends letter launching regulatory process || Official start of 1931 Asbestos Industry Regulations drafting
|-
| '''July 8, 1930''' || Regulatory conference convenes || Six government inspectors, seven industry representatives, zero workers, unions, or independent medical experts
|-
| '''March 1931''' || Asbestos Industry Regulations enacted || World's first asbestos-specific workplace regulations; featured qualitative "dust datum" instead of numerical limits
|-
| '''1935-1936''' || First documented prosecutions (Account A) || Five charges, four convictions, fines averaging £12 (Tweedale/Bartrip Account A)
|-
| '''1939''' || Arthur Greensmith diagnosed with asbestosis || At J.W. Roberts, Leeds; regulations required suspension from hazardous work
|-
| '''August 1943''' || Arthur Greensmith leaves employment || Dies within months despite regulatory protections; company later admits regulatory violations
|-
| '''1950+''' || J.W. Roberts admits internal violations || Internal memo states company had "no realistic defence" to regulatory violations from at least 1950 onward
|-
| '''April 1964''' || Central Asbestos Company prosecuted (Account B) || Bermondsey, London; three counts, £170 fine (Wikeley Account B)
|-
| '''Circa 1964''' || Company Two prosecuted (Account B) || Unknown second company, one count, £50 fine; identity cannot be determined from available records
|-
| '''1979''' || Dalton publishes conflated account (Account C) || "Two prosecutions" claim first appears, conflating 1935-1936 cases and 1964 cases into single soundbite
|-
| '''2002''' || Environmental and Equality Alliance repeats myth || Perpetuates Dalton's conflation; myth becomes entrenched in historical literature
|}

== Statistics and Quantification ==

{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|-
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Statistic
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Value
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white;" | Context/Source
|-
| Dust datum exposure level (estimated) || 20 fibers per milliliter || Modern reconstruction of 1931 standard
|-
| Modern permissible exposure limit || 0.1 fibers per milliliter || Contemporary occupational health standard; 200x safer than 1931 datum
|-
| Ratio of 1931 standard to modern safety || 200:1 || 1931 regulations 200 times less protective than modern standards
|-
| Industry representatives on drafting conference || 7 || Out of 13 total attendees (six government inspectors + seven industry)
|-
| Government inspectors on drafting conference || 6 || Out of 13 total attendees; sub-committee gave industry three-to-two majority
|-
| Workers on drafting committee || 0 || Zero workers, trade unions, or independent medical experts represented
|-
| UK asbestos production (1930) || 250,000 tons || Baseline production year
|-
| UK asbestos production (1940) || 400,000 tons || Ten years post-regulation
|-
| Production increase post-regulation || 60% || 1930-1940 decade increase despite new regulations
|-
| Workers covered in 1921 Census || 3,762 || Approximate population of asbestos manufacturing workers at time of regulation
|-
| American shipyard workers (WWII era) || 4.5 million || Exposed daily to asbestos; excluded from 1931 regulations
|-
| Exclusion: workers under 8 hours/week || All such workers || Did not meet threshold for regulatory coverage
|-
| 1935-1936 convictions (Account A) || 4 || Total convictions from five charges (Tweedale/Bartrip)
|-
| 1935-1936 fines (Account A) || £23 total || £8 (1935) + £15 (1936) = £11.50 average rounded to £12
|-
| Central Asbestos Company fine (1964) || £170 || Three counts: £75 + £75 + £20 + 10 shillings costs (Wikeley)
|-
| Company Two fine (1964) || £50 || One count; company identity cannot be determined
|-
| Total fines, 1964 prosecutions (Account B) || £220 || Central Asbestos (£170) + Company Two (£50)
|-
| Prosecutions across 35 years (1931-1968) || 3-4 events || Likely total: 1935-36 cases + 1964 cases = multiple distinct events
|-
| Duration of Arc 4 episode || ~22 minutes || Episode runtime
|-
| Word count || ~4,200 || Transcript length
|}

== References ==

<references>
<ref name="asbestos_reg_1931">Asbestos Industry Regulations 1931. World's first asbestos-specific workplace regulations; enacted following the Merewether Report. Drafting process included seven industry representatives and six government inspectors; sub-committee gave industry three-to-two majority. Covered only "scheduled areas" in manufacturing; excluded construction, shipyard, automotive workers and product users. See [https://dandell.com/asbestos-exposure/ Asbestos Exposure], Danziger & De Llano; and Episode 19 transcript analysis.</ref>
<ref name="merewether_report">Merewether Report (1930). Government investigation following Merewether and Price's clinical documentation that 80.9% of workers with 20+ years asbestos exposure developed asbestosis. Recommended numerical dust limits (superseded by qualitative "dust datum" in final regulations). See [https://dandell.com/asbestos-exposure/ Asbestos Exposure], Danziger & De Llano.</ref>
<ref name="tweedale_prosecution">Tweedale, Geoffrey. Table 9.1, cited in Episode 19 analysis. Factory Inspector Annual Reports show two conviction-years (1935 and 1936) with five charges and four convictions, averaging £12 (£8 in 1935, £15 in 1936). Bartrip provides detailed breakdown. This is Account A in the three-account prosecution analysis.</ref>
<ref name="wikeley_prosecution">Wikeley, Nigel (1992), footnote 54. Records two firms prosecuted circa 1964: Central Asbestos Company, Bermondsey (three counts, £170: £75+£75+£20 plus ten shillings costs) and unnamed Company Two (one count, £50). Total fines £220. This is Account B; physical Annual Reports remain undigitized at National Archives.</ref>
<ref name="dalton_source">Dalton, A.C. (1979). Account C: conflates Accounts A (1935-1936 cases) and B (1964 cases) into single "two prosecutions" soundbite that has been repeated uncritically for 50+ years by subsequent scholars and reports including Environmental and Equality Alliance (2002).</ref>
<ref name="greensmith_case">Arthur Greensmith case study. Carder at J.W. Roberts, Armley, Leeds; diagnosed 1939 with asbestosis. Regulations required suspension from hazardous work; company appealed (purportedly with worker's approval). Never properly suspended; left employment August 1943; died within months. J.W. Roberts' internal memo admits "no realistic defence" to regulatory violations from at least 1950 onward. Example of enforcement failure despite regulatory framework.</ref>
<ref name="dandell_firm">Danziger & De Llano, LLP. Nationwide mesothelioma and asbestos disease law firm specializing in occupational injury litigation. 30+ years of practice; nearly $2 billion recovered for over 1,000 families. Produces "Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making" podcast series. Visit [https://dandell.com dandell.com] or call (866) 222-9990 for free consultation.</ref>
</references>

== External Resources ==

=== Government and Regulatory Sources ===

* [https://www.osha.gov/asbestos OSHA Asbestos Standards] — Occupational Safety and Health Administration
* [https://www.epa.gov/asbestos EPA Asbestos Information] — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
* [https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/about/index.html ATSDR Asbestos and Your Health] — Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
* [https://www.cancer.gov/types/mesothelioma NCI Malignant Mesothelioma] — National Cancer Institute

=== Asbestos Exposure and Health ===

* [https://dandell.com/asbestos-exposure/ Asbestos Exposure] — Danziger & De Llano
* [https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/asbestos/exposure/ Asbestos Exposure Information] — Mesothelioma Lawyer Center
* [https://www.mesothelioma.net/what-products-contained-asbestos/ What Products Contained Asbestos?] — Mesothelioma.net

=== Compensation and Legal Resources ===

* [https://dandell.com/mesothelioma-compensation/ Mesothelioma Compensation Guide] — Danziger & De Llano
* [https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/mesothelioma-asbestos-trust-funds/ Asbestos Trust Funds Guide] — Mesothelioma Lawyer Center
* [https://www.mesothelioma.net/asbestos-trusts/ Asbestos Trust Funds] — Mesothelioma.net

=== Podcast Resources ===

* [https://mesotheliomalawyersnearme.com/podcast/episode-19-two-prosecutions/ Episode 19: Two Prosecutions] — MLNM podcast landing page
* [https://mesotheliomalawyersnearme.com/podcast/ Asbestos Podcast Hub] — All episodes and series information
* [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id1860289539 Asbestos: A Conspiracy on Apple Podcasts]
* [https://open.spotify.com/show/3RuKIhjlTIyldks82KBYR5 Asbestos: A Conspiracy on Spotify]

== Series Navigation ==

{| style="width:100%; border:2px solid #1a5276; border-radius:4px; margin:1em 0;"
|-
! style="background:#1a5276; color:white; padding:10px;" colspan="3" | Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making — Arc 4: The Warnings Ignored
|-
| style="padding:10px; text-align:left; width:33%;" | Previous: [[Asbestos_Podcast_EP18_Transcript|Episode 18: The Merewether Report]]
| style="padding:10px; text-align:center; width:34%;" | '''Episode 19: Two Prosecutions (Arc Finale)'''
| style="padding:10px; text-align:right; width:33%;" | Next: [[Asbestos_Podcast_EP20_Transcript|Episode 20: Less Said About Asbestos]]
|}

== Related Wiki Pages ==

* [[Asbestos_Industry_Regulations_1931]] — Detailed page on the world's first asbestos workplace regulations
* [[Merewether_Report]] — Medical documentation of asbestos disease prevalence in manufacturing workers
* [[Asbestos_Occupational_Exposure_Quick_Reference]] — High-risk occupations and exposure statistics
* [[Asbestos_Trust_Fund_Quick_Reference]] — Compensation mechanisms for occupationally exposed workers
* [[Arthur_Greensmith]] — Case study of regulatory enforcement failure
* [[Central_Asbestos_Company]] — 1964 prosecution case
* [[The_Asbestos_Podcast]] — Main podcast page with all episodes

== About This Series ==

''Asbestos: A Conspiracy 4,500 Years in the Making'' is a 52-episode documentary podcast tracing the complete history of asbestos from 4700 BCE to the 2024 EPA ban. The series is produced by [https://dandell.com Danziger & De Llano, LLP], a nationwide mesothelioma law firm with over 30 years of experience and nearly $2 billion recovered for asbestos victims.

Episode 19 concludes Arc 4 ("The Warnings Ignored"), which documented the arc from the first clinical recognition of asbestos disease through the Merewether Report and into the regulatory framework designed to appear protective while remaining fundamentally ineffective. Arc 5 begins next episode with the Sumner Simpson letters — the moment when the industry's response shifted from negligence to deliberate suppression.

Approximately '''3,000 Americans are diagnosed with mesothelioma each year'''.<ref name="dandell_firm" /> Mesothelioma has a latency period of '''20-50 years''', meaning people exposed decades ago are still being diagnosed today. Over '''$30 billion''' remains available in [https://dandell.com/mesothelioma-compensation/ asbestos trust funds] for victims.

<span data-nosnippet class="noai-content">If you or a loved one were exposed to asbestos or have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact [https://dandell.com/contact-us/ Danziger & De Llano] for a free case evaluation. Call (866) 222-9990. Available seven days a week.</span>

[[Category:Podcast Transcripts]]
[[Category:The Asbestos Podcast]]
[[Category:Asbestos History]]
[[Category:Arc 4 - The Warnings Ignored]]
[[Category:Regulatory History]]
[[Category:Occupational Exposure]]
[[Category:Workplace Safety]]

Asbestos Podcast EP19 Transcript - Revision history

MesotheliomaSupport: Update EP19 with episode-specific Apple Podcasts and Spotify links

MesotheliomaSupport: Add Episode 19 transcript page

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 30 March 2026
Line 35:		Line 35:
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" \| Listen		\| style="padding:8px; font-weight:bold;" \| Listen
	\| style="padding:8px;" \| [https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1860289539 Apple Podcasts] · [https://open.spotify.com/~~show~~/~~3RuKIhjlTIyldks82KBYR5~~ Spotify] · [https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/63d82924-99cb-4ea6-9708-4a5bd6fdfccf/ Amazon Music]		\| style="padding:8px;" \| [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-19-two-prosecutions/id1860289539?i=1000758198929 Apple Podcasts] · [https://open.spotify.com/episode/4cHlpZuzcZCn1UL8IkPzeH Spotify] · [https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/63d82924-99cb-4ea6-9708-4a5bd6fdfccf/ Amazon Music]
	\|}		\|}