Water Treatment Workers

Water Treatment Workers Asbestos Exposure
Critical facts for compensation claims
Risk Level	Moderate to High
AC Pipe Cutting	53.8 f/cc average
OSHA Exceedance	540x PEL typical
Peak Exposure	1940s-1980s
AC Pipe in US	630,000+ miles
Top Verdicts	$20.5 Million+
Free Case Review →

Executive Summary

Water treatment workers and wastewater treatment plant operators who installed, maintained, and repaired equipment at municipal drinking water facilities, sewage treatment plants, and industrial water processing operations faced extensive asbestos exposure from multiple sources throughout their careers. Scientific studies document that power saw cutting of asbestos-cement (AC) pipe—a routine task for water utility workers—generates average fiber concentrations of 53.8 fibers per cubic centimeter, with peak exposures reaching 129 f/cc, representing 540 to 1,290 times the current OSHA permissible exposure limit of 0.1 f/cc. An estimated 630,000+ miles of AC pipe remain in service across US and Canadian water distribution systems, with 15-18% of total US water infrastructure consisting of asbestos-containing Transite pipe installed between 1929 and the late 1970s. A landmark Paris sewage workers study documented an SMR of 1.79 for pleural cancer (mesothelioma), with lung cancer mortality increasing to SMR 1.60 among workers with more than 20 years of employment. Litigation has produced verdicts exceeding $20.5 million for workers exposed to AC pipe products, with manufacturers including Johns-Manville, CertainTeed, Crane Co., and Jenkins Bros. facing significant liability for failing to warn workers about asbestos hazards.

Water Treatment Workers and Asbestos Exposure: At-a-Glance

• AC pipe cutting fiber levels — Power saw cutting of asbestos-cement pipe generates average concentrations of 53.8 f/cc, exceeding OSHA limits by 540 times
• Peak exposure measurements — AC pipe cutting operations have produced fiber counts as high as 129 f/cc, representing 1,290 times the permissible exposure limit
• US infrastructure scope — An estimated 630,000 miles of asbestos-cement water pipe remain in active service across American and Canadian water distribution networks
• Pleural cancer mortality — The Paris sewage workers cohort study found a standardized mortality ratio of 1.79 for pleural cancer among wastewater workers
• Duration-dependent lung cancer risk — Sewage workers with 20+ years of employment showed lung cancer SMR of 1.60, indicating cumulative dose-response
• Multiple exposure pathways — Workers encountered asbestos through AC pipe cutting, pump repacking, valve gasket replacement, and confined space maintenance activities
• Transite pipe composition — Asbestos-cement pipes contained 15-20% chrysotile asbestos fibers by weight, manufactured from 1929 through the late 1970s
• Litigation outcomes — Verdicts exceeding $20.5 million have been awarded to workers exposed to AC pipe and related water treatment asbestos products
• Trust fund access — Water treatment workers may file claims against the Johns-Manville Trust ($2.5 billion initial funding) and other established bankruptcy trusts
• Ongoing hazard — Much of the AC pipe installed in the 1940s-1950s has now exceeded its 75-year design life, requiring increasing maintenance and replacement work

Key Facts

Metric	Finding
Average AC pipe cutting exposure	53.8 fibers per cubic centimeter during power saw operations, documented across multiple field studies
Peak recorded fiber concentration	129 f/cc during AC pipe power sawing — 1,290 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of 0.1 f/cc
OSHA excursion limit exceedance	100% of AC pipe cutting tasks exceed the OSHA short-term excursion limit of 1.0 f/cc
Paris sewage workers pleural cancer SMR	1.79 (3 deaths observed vs. 1.68 expected) in a cohort of 1,722 workers followed 1970-1999
Lung cancer SMR (20+ year workers)	1.60 (40 deaths) among Paris sewage workers with more than two decades of employment
US AC pipe infrastructure	630,000+ miles still in service; 15-18% of total US water distribution systems consist of asbestos-cement pipe
Pipe laying exposure range	185-520 fibers per liter (0.185-0.52 f/cc) measured during French pipe laying and removal operations
Pump manufacturer asbestos use	Goulds, Worthington, Fairbanks Morse, and Dresser used asbestos packing in water treatment pumps through 1985
Top verdict for AC pipe worker	$20.5 million awarded in Hardcastle v. Johns-Manville for negligence and malicious conduct
Valve manufacturer liability	$23 million verdict (90% liability) against a valve manufacturer; $13 million Jenkins Bros. verdict affirmed on appeal
Johns-Manville Trust initial funding	$2.5 billion established to compensate workers with 6+ months of documented Johns-Manville product exposure
AC pipe design lifespan	75 years — pipe installed in the 1940s and 1950s has now reached or exceeded its engineered service life

What Types of Water Treatment Workers Were Exposed to Asbestos?

Water treatment and wastewater operations employed diverse workers who encountered asbestos throughout municipal and industrial water systems.

Drinking Water Treatment Plant Workers

Municipal water treatment facilities employed multiple job classifications with asbestos exposure:

• Plant operators: Monitored treatment processes surrounded by asbestos-insulated equipment
• Maintenance mechanics: Serviced pumps, valves, and piping containing asbestos components
• Instrument technicians: Maintained electrical and control systems with asbestos insulation—similar to electricians
• Laboratory technicians: Worked in facilities with asbestos-containing building materials
• Utility workers: Performed general maintenance disturbing asbestos materials

Wastewater Treatment Plant Workers

Sewage treatment facilities presented additional exposure sources from sludge handling operations:

• Treatment plant operators: Managed processes in facilities with extensive asbestos insulation
• Sludge handling workers: Maintained digesters, incinerators, and dewatering equipment
• Collection system workers: Serviced sewer infrastructure containing AC pipe
• Pump station operators: Worked in confined spaces with asbestos-insulated equipment

Water Distribution System Workers

Infrastructure maintenance crews faced some of the highest exposure levels:

• Pipe layers: Cut and installed AC water mains with power saws—similar exposure to plumbers and pipefitters
• Service technicians: Tapped into AC mains for new customer connections
• Valve maintenance crews: Serviced valves with asbestos gaskets and packing
• Emergency repair crews: Responded to water main breaks involving AC pipe

"Water treatment workers represent an understudied occupational group despite clear documented exposures. The scientific evidence shows AC pipe cutting generates fiber concentrations hundreds of times above safe limits, yet these workers often don't realize they have viable compensation claims."

— Paul Danziger, Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano

What Asbestos Products Did Water Treatment Workers Encounter?

Water treatment facilities constructed between the 1940s and 1980s incorporated asbestos in virtually every system requiring durability, chemical resistance, or thermal insulation.

Product Type	Asbestos Content	Primary Manufacturers	Application	Peak Usage
Asbestos-cement water pipe (Transite)	15-20% chrysotile	Johns-Manville, CertainTeed	Water mains, distribution pipes	1929-1970s
Pump packing (braided)	80-100% chrysotile	Garlock, John Crane	Centrifugal pumps, booster pumps	1940s-1985
Valve gaskets (Cranite)	75-85% chrysotile	Crane Co., Jenkins Bros.	Gate, butterfly, check valves	1923-1980s
Valve stem packing	70-95% chrysotile	Garlock, John Crane, Lunkenheimer	Valve maintenance	1920s-1980
Boiler insulation	15-50% amosite/chrysotile	Johns-Manville, Owens-Corning	Facility heating systems	1940s-1975
Pipe insulation	6-15% chrysotile/amosite	Johns-Manville	Hot water and steam lines	1930s-1970s
Chlorination equipment	Various	Multiple manufacturers	Chlorinators, evaporators	1940s-1980s
Electrical switchgear	30-90% asbestos	GE, Westinghouse	Motor control centers, panels	1930s-1980s
Digester insulation	15-40% chrysotile	Various manufacturers	Anaerobic sludge digesters	1940s-1980s
Dresser couplings	Asbestos gaskets	Dresser Industries	Pipe connections and repairs	1940s-1980s

The Asbestos-Cement Pipe Crisis

Asbestos-cement pipe (also called Transite pipe) represents the most significant exposure source for water treatment workers:

Scale of the Problem:

• 630,000+ miles of AC pipe remain in US and Canadian water systems
• 15-18% of total US water distribution infrastructure consists of AC pipe
• 75-year design life means pipe installed in the 1940s-1950s is now failing
• Aggressive water conditions (low pH, low alkalinity) accelerate fiber release

Johns-Manville installed the first AC pipe manufacturing machine in North America in 1929 and marketed Transite pipes with expected 75-year lifespans. The company became the nation's largest asbestos products manufacturer before filing bankruptcy in 1982.

CertainTeed Corporation continued manufacturing AC pipes until 1993—more than a decade after the dangers were widely known. Approximately 60,000 claims remain pending against the company.

Critical Evidence: If you cut, repaired, or installed AC pipe (Transite pipe) during your career, this exposure can support claims against the Johns-Manville Trust Fund and potentially against CertainTeed. Document every employer and job site where you worked with these materials.

Pump and Valve Manufacturers

Water treatment facilities relied heavily on pumps and valves that incorporated asbestos packing and gaskets:

Pump Manufacturers:

• Goulds Pumps, Inc.: Used asbestos gaskets, braided packing, and insulation from mid-1940s until 1985. Received Army-Navy "E" Award in 1944 and expanded into water systems post-WWII.
• Worthington Pump and Machinery Corporation: Manufactured pumps with asbestos chord, gaskets, and packing from 1840s-1980s. Now covered by Halliburton DII Industries Trust.
• Fairbanks Morse: Water service pumps and valves with original equipment asbestos gaskets and packing.
• Dresser Pumps: Municipal water pumps covered by Halliburton DII Industries Trust.

Valve Manufacturers:

• Crane Co.: Marketed Cranite gasket material (75-85% asbestos) as suitable for "steam, water, air, gas" services from 1923-1962. Multiple multi-million dollar verdicts.
• Jenkins Bros.: $23 million verdict (90% liability) and $13 million verdict for steamfitter exposure.
• Lunkenheimer/Cincinnati Valve: 1970s catalogs documented multiple asbestos packing formulations including teflon-impregnated asbestos and blue African asbestos.

How Were Water Treatment Workers Exposed to Asbestos?

Water treatment workers experienced asbestos exposure through job-specific mechanisms that generated extreme fiber concentrations.

AC Pipe Cutting and Repair

The most hazardous activity for water utility workers was cutting asbestos-cement pipe with power saws:

Documented Exposure Levels:

Activity	Exposure Range	Mean Exposure	OSHA Exceedance
AC pipe power sawing	11.3 – 129.0 f/cc	53.8 f/cc	100% exceed OSHA STEL
AC sheet/roofing cutting	1.3 – 130.0 f/cc	24.0 f/cc	86% exceed OSHA STEL
Pipe laying/installation	0.185 – 0.52 f/cc	Varies	5.2x OSHA PEL

These measurements demonstrate AC pipe cutting generates exposures 540 times the OSHA PEL on average, with peak exposures exceeding 1,290 times the permissible limit.

Worker Testimony: Underground pipe layers working with AC water and sewer pipe "frequently" cut and beveled pipe with power saws, creating dust that workers inhaled without any respiratory protection during the 1970s-1980s.

Tapping and Service Connections

Installing service connections to AC water mains exposed workers through drilling operations:

• Drilling into AC mains for new connections released asbestos debris
• Unless pipes were flushed under pressure, drilling and tapping of AC pipes can introduce asbestos-containing debris into distribution systems
• In low-flow areas, fiber counts can rise 10 to 100 times typical values after disturbance

"The companies that made AC pipe knew about the dangers but showed callous disregard by failing to warn customers. Internal documents reveal they were well aware of the health risks for decades before taking action."

— Rod De Llano, Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano

Pump Maintenance and Repacking

Water treatment pumps required routine packing replacement that generated significant exposure:

• Pump disassembly: Released compressed asbestos packing under pressure
• Scraping old packing: Removed deteriorated material from stuffing boxes
• Cutting new packing: Sized braided asbestos packing rings for installation
• Installation: Generated fibers during compression and adjustment

Pump operators, maintenance workers, and millwrights performed these tasks regularly. Packing wore from friction and required replacement to prevent leakage.

Valve Maintenance and Gasket Replacement

Valve service throughout water systems generated chronic exposure:

• External insulation removal: Required when valves needed repair
• Bonnet gasket replacement: Opened valves exposed internal asbestos components
• Stem packing replacement: Regular maintenance schedule
• Flange gasket fabrication: Hammer/punch operations on Cranite material created dust
• Scraping and wire brushing: Removed old gaskets from flanged connections

Testimony in litigation established workers performed these tasks over decades.

Confined Space Exposure

Water treatment involves substantial work in confined spaces that concentrated airborne fibers:

• Wet wells: Underground chambers housing submersible pumps
• Valve vaults: Underground access points for distribution system valves
• Clarifier mechanisms: Interior work on sedimentation equipment
• Filter galleries: Enclosed spaces beneath filtration systems
• Digester interiors: Maintenance inside anaerobic sludge digesters

Studies document confined spaces result in approximately 2-5 times higher fiber concentrations than similar work in open areas.

What Do Mortality Studies Reveal About Water Treatment Worker Disease Risk?

While water treatment workers have not been separately identified in major occupational mortality studies, epidemiological evidence from related occupations and specific studies of sewage workers documents elevated disease risk.

Paris Sewage Workers Study (Landmark Research)

A cohort study of 1,722 Paris sewage workers followed from 1970-1999 documented significant excess mortality:

• Overall mortality SMR: 1.25 (530 deaths, 95% CI 1.15-1.36)
• All cancers SMR: 1.37 (235 deaths, 95% CI 1.20-1.56)
• Lung cancer SMR: 1.47 (68 deaths, 95% CI 1.14-1.86)
• Pleural cancer (mesothelioma) SMR: 1.79 (3 deaths, 95% CI 0.36-5.22)

Critically, lung cancer mortality increased with duration of employment, reaching SMR 1.60 (40 deaths) for workers with more than 20 years of service. The study noted that despite no direct asbestos use by sewage workers, the pleural cancer excess suggests that toxic industrial substances were likely dumped in sewers historically, creating occupational asbestos exposure pathways.

French Wastewater Collection and Treatment Workers Study

A comprehensive literature review presented at the 2020 Occupational and Environmental Medicine conference examined asbestos exposure in wastewater workers:

• Six cohort studies of sewer workers and treatment plant operators identified
• Five studies reported non-significant increases in respiratory cancer
• One French sewer worker study showed increased mortality from mesothelioma

French administrative database measurements (2003-2020) from 2,886 workplace samples documented 95th percentile concentrations:

• Sewer workers: 22 f/L (n=135)
• Sanitary systems control technicians: 148 f/L (n=36)
• Pipe laying/installation/removal: 185-520 f/L

Related Occupational Categories with Elevated PMR

The 2025 UK mesothelioma mortality study identified several categories encompassing water treatment worker activities:

• Energy plant operatives: PMR 329.2 (includes utility plant operators)
• Plumbers and heating/ventilating engineers: PMR 344.9 (includes water system maintenance)
• Plant and machine operatives: PMR 127.5 (may include treatment plant operators)

Water treatment workers performing maintenance functions similar to pipefitters, utility workers, and plant operators likely experience proportionate mortality ratios in the range of 150-300 based on shared exposure profiles.

Evidence for Claims: The Paris sewage workers study provides direct epidemiological evidence of elevated mesothelioma mortality among wastewater workers. Combined with documented extreme fiber concentrations during AC pipe cutting, water treatment workers have strong scientific support for compensation claims.

What Compensation Have Water Treatment Workers Recovered?

Water treatment workers and workers exposed to AC pipe products have recovered substantial compensation through litigation and trust fund claims.

Notable Verdicts and Settlements

$20,500,000 Verdict – Johns-Manville AC Pipe Worker (2001): William Hardcastle worked at the J-M A/C Pipe Corporation facility in Stockton, California. The Alameda County jury found negligence and malicious conduct, awarding $10 million compensatory (plaintiff) + $10 million (wife) + $500,000 punitive damages. Expert testimony established the defendant knew in the 1980s there was no safe asbestos exposure level and cheated on air quality testing with advance clean-up operations. See Mesothelioma Settlements for additional case examples.

$14,600,000 Settlement – Plumber/Pipefitter (2024): A 68-year-old California plumber/pipefitter who worked with heating equipment, pumps, valves, and boilers including asbestos gaskets, packing, and insulation from the early 1960s onward recovered approximately $14.6 million from equipment manufacturers.

$8,450,000 Verdict – Pipefitter (2025): A career pipefitter exposed to JM 352 insulating cement (100% chrysotile) on boilers and asbestos gaskets on pumps received an $8.45 million verdict. Weil-McLain (boiler manufacturer) was found 60% liable ($5.07 million) for gross negligence in repackaging asbestos insulation without warnings.

$5,100,000 Settlement – AC Water/Sewer Pipe Contractor: A 79-year-old general contractor who worked with AC water and sewer pipe in California from the 1950s-1980s recovered $5.1 million.

Seven-Figure Settlement – Underground Pipe Layer (2024): A union laborer and underground pipe layer who cut, beveled, and installed AC water and sewer pipe using power saws in the 1970s-1980s recovered a seven-figure settlement. The court found manufacturers showed callous disregard by failing to warn customers.

Valve Manufacturer Verdicts

$23,000,000 Verdict – Valve Manufacturer (2023): A career union steamfitter received a $23 million verdict with 90% liability assigned to the valve manufacturer and 10% to Johns Manville.

$13,000,000 Verdict – Jenkins Bros. (2024): A steamfitter received $13 million for past pain/suffering plus $10 million for future pain/suffering against Jenkins Bros. valve manufacturer, affirmed on appeal.

$6,500,000 Verdict – Crane Co. (2024): A commercial plumber who regularly used Crane gaskets/valves and hammered out flange and bonnet gaskets from Cranite (75-85% asbestos) recovered $6.5 million, affirmed on appeal. The court held Crane liable for original equipment gaskets and found a manufacturer duty to warn for foreseeable maintenance exposure.

"Water treatment workers often qualify for claims against multiple manufacturers because they used pumps, valves, gaskets, and pipe from numerous companies throughout their careers. A thorough work history review can identify exposure sources the worker may have forgotten about decades later."

— Michelle Whitman, Attorney, Danziger & De Llano

Asbestos Bankruptcy Trust Funds

Water treatment workers with documented product exposure may file claims with established trusts:

Trust Fund	Products Covered	Scheduled Value	Initial Funding
Johns-Manville Trust	Transite AC pipe, pipe insulation, gaskets	$350,000 base	$2.5 billion
Halliburton DII Industries Trust	Dresser Pumps, Pacific Pumps, Worthington	Varies	Active
Garlock Sealing Trust	Gaskets, packing materials	$300,000	Active
Owens-Corning/Fibreboard Trust	Insulation products	~$23,865 avg.	Active
Pittsburgh Corning Trust	Pipe and building insulation	$35,000	Active

Johns-Manville Trust Qualifying Criteria:

• 6 months exposure to Johns-Manville products before December 31, 1982
• Qualifying occupations include: pipe cutters/installers/workers, maintenance workers, plumbers, pipefitters
• Mesothelioma claims valued at scheduled amounts with payment percentage applied

CertainTeed/DBMP Trust Status:

• DBMP LLC filed bankruptcy January 23, 2020
• Approximately 60,000 claims pending
• Trust not fully established; restructuring controversy ongoing

Trust Fund Advantage: Trust fund claims do not require proving negligence—only documented exposure to the manufacturer's products. Multiple claims can be filed simultaneously, and trust payments do not reduce other compensation sources like lawsuits or workers' compensation benefits.

How Can Water Treatment Workers Document Their Asbestos Exposure?

Building successful compensation claims requires thorough documentation of employment history, job duties, and specific asbestos products encountered.

Employment Documentation

Gather records establishing your water utility work history:

• Municipal personnel files: Job titles, work assignments, facilities where employed
• Union records: AFSCME, IUOE, or other union membership and assignment records
• Social Security earnings: Documents all employers and employment dates
• Pension records: Municipal or state retirement system documentation
• Training records: Asbestos awareness training, equipment certifications

Product and Equipment Documentation

Identify specific products and manufacturers encountered:

• AC pipe work: Dates, locations, and circumstances of Transite pipe cutting or repair
• Pump brands: Goulds, Worthington, Fairbanks Morse, Dresser equipment serviced
• Valve manufacturers: Crane Co., Jenkins Bros., Lunkenheimer valves maintained
• Gasket materials: Cranite, Garlock, John Crane products used
• Facility names: Treatment plants, pump stations, distribution infrastructure

Coworker and Witness Information

Contact information for colleagues who can confirm exposure:

• Fellow water treatment workers who witnessed asbestos handling
• Supervisors who assigned work involving AC pipe or equipment maintenance
• Contractors who performed asbestos-related work at facilities
• Union representatives familiar with workplace conditions

Medical Documentation

Maintain complete records of diagnosis and treatment:

• Pathology reports confirming mesothelioma diagnosis
• Imaging studies documenting disease
• Treatment records and physician notes from specialized treatment centers
• Occupational medicine evaluations linking disease to water treatment exposure

What Is the Current Exposure Risk for Water Treatment Workers?

Current water treatment workers continue facing exposure risk from aging infrastructure and ongoing AC pipe maintenance requirements.

Ongoing AC Pipe Maintenance

With 630,000+ miles of AC pipe approaching or exceeding design life:

• Main break repairs: Emergency response to ruptured AC pipe
• Service line installation: Tapping into AC mains for new connections
• Valve installations: Cutting AC pipe to install shutoff valves
• Replacement projects: Systematic AC pipe removal programs

Regional Concentrations: Western US and Canada have highest AC pipe prevalence (40-75% of water systems in some jurisdictions). Major cities with significant AC pipe include San Diego (2,000 miles), Phoenix area (extensive), and North Carolina systems (5,000 miles).

Current Regulatory Framework

Modern regulations protect water treatment workers through:

OSHA Standards:

• PEL: 0.1 f/cc (8-hour time-weighted average)
• Excursion limit: 1.0 f/cc (30-minute period)
• AC pipe guidance: Wet methods for cutting mandatory; competent person required
• Training: Annual asbestos awareness and job-specific instruction required

EPA Regulations:

• Drinking water MCL: 7 million fibers per liter (ingestion standard)
• NESHAP regulations: Govern AC pipe removal and disposal
• Notification: 10 working days advance notice to EPA for asbestos projects

Facility Asbestos Management

Water utilities implement comprehensive asbestos management through:

• GIS tracking of AC pipe locations
• Non-destructive testing to assess pipe condition
• Phased replacement programs prioritizing high-risk segments
• Job hazard analyses for maintenance activities
• Specialized training for crews working with AC pipe

Statute of Limitations Warning: Filing deadlines for asbestos claims vary by state—most allow only 1-3 years from diagnosis. Texas allows 2 years from diagnosis or discovery. Do not delay seeking legal consultation after a mesothelioma diagnosis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What level of asbestos exposure did water treatment workers face?

Water treatment workers who cut asbestos-cement (AC) pipe with power saws experienced average fiber concentrations of 53.8 fibers per cubic centimeter, which is 540 times the current OSHA permissible exposure limit of 0.1 f/cc. Peak exposures during AC pipe cutting reached 129 f/cc — 1,290 times the legal limit. Even lower-intensity activities such as pipe laying and installation generated fiber levels 5.2 times the OSHA PEL. Workers in confined spaces like wet wells and valve vaults experienced concentrations 2-5 times higher than those measured in open-air conditions.

How much AC pipe remains in US water systems?

An estimated 630,000 miles of asbestos-cement pipe remain in active service across American and Canadian water distribution systems, comprising approximately 15-18% of total US water infrastructure. The western United States and Canada have the highest concentrations, with some jurisdictions reporting 40-75% of their water systems consisting of AC pipe. Much of this pipe was installed between the 1940s and 1970s and has now reached or exceeded its engineered 75-year design life, requiring increasing maintenance and replacement work that creates ongoing exposure risks.

What compensation is available for water treatment workers with mesothelioma?

Water treatment workers have recovered verdicts and settlements ranging from seven figures to $20.5 million, with the landmark Hardcastle v. Johns-Manville case producing a $20.5 million verdict for an AC pipe worker. Workers may also file claims against multiple asbestos bankruptcy trust funds, including the Johns-Manville Trust ($2.5 billion initial funding, $350,000 scheduled value for mesothelioma) and the Halliburton DII Industries Trust covering Dresser and Worthington pump products. Trust fund claims do not require proving negligence — only documented exposure to the manufacturer's products.

Which manufacturers are liable for water treatment asbestos exposure?

Key manufacturers include Johns-Manville (Transite AC pipe, insulation), CertainTeed Corporation (AC pipe manufactured until 1993), Crane Co. (Cranite gaskets, 75-85% asbestos), Jenkins Bros. (valves), Goulds Pumps (asbestos packing through 1985), Worthington Pump, Dresser Industries, Garlock (gaskets and packing), and Lunkenheimer/Cincinnati Valve. Multiple valve and pump manufacturers have faced multi-million dollar verdicts, with a $23 million verdict against one valve manufacturer and a $13 million Jenkins Bros. verdict both affirmed on appeal.

Is there epidemiological evidence linking wastewater work to mesothelioma?

Yes. The Paris sewage workers cohort study (1,722 workers followed 1970-1999) documented a standardized mortality ratio of 1.79 for pleural cancer (mesothelioma), with lung cancer SMR reaching 1.60 among workers with more than 20 years of employment. A comprehensive 2020 review identified six cohort studies of sewer and treatment plant workers, with five reporting non-significant increases in respiratory cancer and one French study showing increased mesothelioma mortality. The UK 2025 mesothelioma mortality study found PMRs of 329.2 for energy plant operatives and 344.9 for plumbers — occupational categories that overlap with water treatment worker activities.

What is the statute of limitations for water treatment worker asbestos claims?

Filing deadlines vary by state, with most states allowing only 1-3 years from the date of mesothelioma diagnosis or discovery of the disease. Texas allows 2 years from diagnosis or discovery. Because mesothelioma has a latency period of 20-50 years, workers who were exposed to asbestos decades ago may only now be developing symptoms. It is critical to consult an experienced mesothelioma attorney promptly after diagnosis to ensure all filing deadlines are met across relevant jurisdictions.

Do current water treatment workers still face asbestos exposure risk?

Yes. With 630,000+ miles of AC pipe now reaching or exceeding its 75-year design life, current workers face exposure during main break repairs, service line installations, valve work, and systematic pipe replacement projects. Modern OSHA regulations require wet cutting methods, respiratory protection, and annual asbestos awareness training, but emergency repair situations and older municipal systems may still present exposure risks, particularly in jurisdictions where 40-75% of water infrastructure consists of AC pipe.

Quick Statistics

• 1,722 workers — size of the Paris sewage worker cohort study, the largest epidemiological study directly relevant to water treatment workers
• 530 deaths — total mortality observed in the Paris cohort, with overall SMR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.15-1.36)
• 2,886 workplace samples — number of French administrative database measurements documenting wastewater worker fiber exposure levels from 2003-2020
• 60,000 pending claims — approximate number of asbestos claims outstanding against CertainTeed Corporation, which manufactured AC pipe until 1993
• $2.5 billion — initial funding of the Johns-Manville Asbestos Trust, the largest single-company asbestos trust fund
• $350,000 — scheduled base value for mesothelioma claims filed with the Johns-Manville Trust
• 1929 — year Johns-Manville installed the first AC pipe manufacturing machine in North America, beginning decades of Transite pipe production
• 1993 — year CertainTeed finally stopped manufacturing asbestos-cement pipe, more than a decade after the health dangers were widely recognized
• $14.6 million — 2024 settlement for a California plumber/pipefitter who worked with pumps, valves, and gaskets containing asbestos
• 148 f/L — 95th percentile fiber concentration measured for French sanitary systems control technicians, 1.48 times the OSHA PEL

Get Help Today

Water treatment workers with mesothelioma face unique challenges in documenting decades of exposure to AC pipe, pumps, valves, and equipment from multiple manufacturers. Experienced mesothelioma attorneys can help identify all responsible parties and maximize compensation through lawsuits and trust fund claims.

Danziger & De Llano — Experienced mesothelioma attorneys representing water treatment workers nationwide. Call (855) 699-5441 for a free, confidential case evaluation.

Mesothelioma Lawyers Near Me — Find experienced asbestos attorneys in your area and take a free case evaluation quiz to understand your legal options.

Mesothelioma.net — Comprehensive patient resources covering diagnosis, treatment options, clinical trials, and support services for mesothelioma patients and families.

Mesothelioma Lawyer Center — Legal resources for asbestos exposure victims, including guides to trust fund claims, settlement processes, and occupational exposure documentation.

Related Pages

• Plumbers and Asbestos Exposure
• Pipefitters and Asbestos Exposure
• Utility Workers and Asbestos Exposure
• Electricians and Asbestos Exposure
• Johns-Manville Asbestos Trust Fund
• Guide to Asbestos Trust Fund Claims