Pleurectomy and Decortication

P/D Surgical Profile
Lung-Sparing Cytoreductive Surgery
Category	Medical / Surgical Treatment
Procedure Type	Thoracic Surgery (Inpatient)
Anesthesia	General
Duration	4–6 hours
Hospital Stay	7–14 days typical
30-Day Mortality	0–3.4% (high-volume centers)
Goal	Macroscopic Complete Resection (MCR)
Key Trial	MARS 2 (Phase 3 RCT)
Free Case Review →

Pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) is a lung-sparing surgical procedure for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) that removes the diseased pleural lining and all visible tumor while preserving the underlying lung. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia by a specialized thoracic surgeon and typically takes 4–6 hours. Over the past two decades, P/D has largely supplanted the more radical extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), which removes the entire lung, as centers worldwide have recognized that lung-sparing approaches achieve comparable or superior survival with significantly lower morbidity and mortality.

The procedure exists in two forms: standard P/D, which removes the parietal and visceral pleura, and extended P/D (EPD), which additionally includes resection and reconstruction of the diaphragm and/or pericardium. The goal of both is macroscopic complete resection (MCR) — removal of all visible tumor. When combined with adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, or hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC), P/D forms a cornerstone of multimodal treatment for resectable mesothelioma.

The 2023 MARS 2 trial introduced significant controversy by reporting that extended P/D was associated with worse survival compared to chemotherapy alone, though critics have noted that the trial's 9% 90-day surgical mortality rate far exceeds the 0–4.2% rates achieved at high-volume centers — underscoring the importance of selecting experienced mesothelioma surgical teams.

Pleurectomy and decortication at a glance:

• Standard P/D vs extended P/D — standard removes parietal and visceral pleura only, while extended additionally resects and reconstructs the diaphragm and pericardium
• MARS 2 surgery vs chemotherapy alone — 335-patient RCT found extended P/D plus chemotherapy produced worse 2-year survival and 9% 90-day surgical mortality compared to chemotherapy alone
• High-volume centers vs MARS 2 mortality — Mount Sinai reported 0% 30-day and 4.2% 90-day mortality in 71 patients during the same enrollment period where MARS 2 recorded 9%
• Complete vs incomplete resection — patients achieving macroscopic complete resection survived a median 28.2 months compared to 13.1 months for those with incomplete resection
• HITHOC-enhanced vs surgery-only survival — adding heated intrathoracic chemotherapy extended median survival from 11–22.8 months to 13–35 months across seven studies
• P/D mortality vs EPP mortality — P/D achieves 0–3.4% perioperative mortality at experienced centers compared to historically higher rates for EPP, with fewer cardiac and infectious complications
• Prolonged air leak vs bronchopleural fistula — air leak affects 7.1–23.5% of P/D patients (unique to lung-sparing surgery) while bronchopleural fistula is more common after EPP
• Surgical candidates vs non-candidates — eligibility requires FEV1 and DLCO at least 50% predicted, ECOG 0–1, and resectable disease at stages I–IIIA, excluding patients with advanced disease or poor lung function
• ICU phase vs full recovery — patients spend 1–3 days in ICU and 7–14 days in hospital, then require 3–6 months before returning to near-baseline activity
• P/D lung function vs EPP lung function — P/D preserves postoperative pulmonary capacity with continued improvement up to 6 months, while EPP permanently removes the affected lung

Key Facts

Metric	Finding
MARS 2 Overall Survival (EPD + chemo vs chemo alone)	HR not in favor of surgery; 9% 90-day surgical mortality; n = 335 (Lim et al., Lancet 2024)
Mount Sinai P/D 30-Day Mortality	0% (0/71 patients); 90-day mortality 4.2% (3/71); contemporaneous with MARS 2 enrollment (Gulati & Flores et al., 2026)
Lapidot P/D Cohort Survival	355 patients; epithelioid patients with MCR achieved superior OS vs large EPP cohorts (Lapidot et al., Ann Surg 2022)
MCR vs Incomplete Resection Survival	Median 28.2 months (MCR) vs 13.1 months (incomplete); p < 0.0001; n = 71 (P/D + HITHOC series, 2019)
HITHOC Meta-Analysis Effect Size	Hedges' g = 0.384 ± 0.105; 95% CI: 0.178–0.591; p < 0.001 for median survival; recurrence-free interval Hedges' g = 0.591, p < 0.001 (Oncotarget 2017)
HITHOC Survival Range (Systematic Review)	13–35 months with HITHOC vs 11–22.8 months without; 6 of 7 studies favored HITHOC; 0% HITHOC-related mortality (2025 review)
HITHOC Renal Insufficiency Risk	High-dose cisplatin patients 2.7× more likely to develop renal insufficiency; p = 0.006; n = 350 multicenter (Klotz et al. 2021)
P/D 30-Day Mortality Range (12 Series)	0.0–6.8% across published series (2008–2015); high-volume centers 0–3.4% (literature review)
Prolonged Air Leak Incidence	7.1–23.5% of P/D patients; unique to lung-sparing approach; associated with prolonged hospital stay (meta-analysis 2022)
Overall Complication Rate Range	9.0–43.0% across 12 published series; wide variance correlates with center volume and experience
PPO-DLCO Respiratory Failure Predictor	PPO-DLCO of 40% identified as best predictor of postoperative respiratory failure; threshold ≥ 50% required (NCT07126509)
Morbidity Reduction Strategies	Early tracheostomy, therapeutic anticoagulation at diagnosis, and gastrostomy placement significantly reduced P/D morbidity (Bou-Samra et al., PMC 2023)

What Is Pleurectomy and Decortication?

Pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) is one of two primary surgical approaches for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. The procedure involves two distinct steps performed in sequence during a single operation:

Pleurectomy: The surgeon removes the diseased parietal pleura (the membrane lining the chest wall) and the visceral pleura (the membrane covering the lung surface). This is the structural removal that strips away the primary tumor-bearing tissue.

Decortication: The surgeon then removes all visible tumors, fibrous tissue, and affected tissue from the lung surface and surrounding structures. The goal is to free the lung so it can fully re-expand within the chest cavity.

What Is the Difference Between Standard P/D and Extended P/D?

The two main variants differ in their extent of resection:

Feature	Standard P/D	Extended P/D (EPD)
Pleura Removal	Parietal and visceral pleura	Parietal and visceral pleura
Diaphragm	Preserved	Resected and reconstructed
Pericardium	Preserved	Resected and reconstructed
Lung	Preserved	Preserved
Goal	Tumor debulking / MCR	Macroscopic complete resection (MCR)

How Does P/D Compare to Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP)?

Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is the more radical alternative, removing the entire affected lung along with the pleura, diaphragm, and pericardium. The shift from EPP to P/D has been one of the most significant trends in mesothelioma surgery over the past two decades:

• P/D preserves lung function, reducing the physiological impact on the patient
• P/D has significantly lower perioperative mortality (0–3.4% vs. historically higher rates for EPP)
• Lapidot et al. (Annals of Surgery, 2022) analyzed 355 P/D patients and found epithelioid patients with MCR achieved superior overall survival compared to large EPP cohorts
• Major centers including Memorial Sloan Kettering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and leading European institutions have shifted from EPP to P/D-based approaches
• P/D has lower rates of empyema, atrial fibrillation, hemorrhage, and bronchopleural fistula compared to EPP

What Did the MARS 2 Trial Show?

The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2) trial was the first randomized controlled trial comparing extended pleurectomy decortication plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for resectable pleural mesothelioma. Its results, presented at the Presidential Plenary of the 2023 World Conference on Lung Cancer, generated substantial controversy within the mesothelioma surgical community.

Trial Design and Results

Parameter	Detail
Design	Phase 3 randomized controlled trial
Enrollment	335 patients (169 surgery + chemotherapy, 166 chemotherapy alone)
Lead Investigator	Eric Lim, MB ChB, MD — Royal Brompton Hospital / Imperial College London
Key Finding	EPD was associated with worse survival to 2 years and more serious adverse events
90-Day Surgical Mortality	9% in the surgery arm
Investigator Statement	Dr. Lim stated surgery cessation would increase survival by 28% for these patients

Why Is MARS 2 Controversial?

The MARS 2 results generated significant debate because the 9% 90-day mortality rate observed in the surgery arm was considerably higher than rates reported by high-volume mesothelioma surgical centers. A contemporaneous Mount Sinai series led by Dr. Raja Flores analyzed 71 patients undergoing P/D between 2015–2021 — the same enrollment period as MARS 2 — and found strikingly different outcomes:

• 30-day mortality: 0% (compared to the overall surgical mortality pattern in MARS 2)
• 90-day mortality: 4.2% (compared to 9% in MARS 2)

This difference underscores a critical point: surgical outcomes for mesothelioma are highly volume-dependent and center-dependent. The implication is not necessarily that P/D should be abandoned, but rather that it should be performed only at centers with established expertise and high case volumes. The debate continues between those who interpret MARS 2 as evidence against surgery and those who view it as evidence for centralizing surgical care.

What Is HITHOC and How Does It Enhance P/D?

HITHOC (Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy) involves the perfusion of heated chemotherapy solution directly into the pleural cavity immediately after cytoreductive surgery (P/D or EPD). The concept is analogous to HIPEC (heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy) used in peritoneal cancers, and aims to destroy residual microscopic tumor cells that surgery alone cannot remove.

What Is the Standard HITHOC Protocol?

Parameter	Standard Protocol
Drug	Cisplatin (80–125 mg/m²), sometimes combined with doxorubicin
Vehicle	2 liters saline
Temperature	40–43°C (104–109°F)
Duration	60–70 minutes of continuous perfusion

What Does the Evidence Show for HITHOC?

Multiple studies and meta-analyses support the addition of HITHOC to cytoreductive surgery:

• Meta-analysis (2017): HITHOC after surgery significantly prolonged median survival compared to surgery alone (Hedges' g = 0.384 ± 0.105, 95% CI: 0.178–0.591, p < 0.001). HITHOC was also favored for recurrence-free interval (Hedges' g = 0.591, p < 0.001)
• Systematic review (2025): Six of seven studies demonstrated a survival benefit for HITHOC; median survival ranged from 13–35 months with HITHOC versus 11–22.8 months without. No HITHOC-related mortality was reported across all studies
• P/D + HITHOC series (2019): 71 patients; epithelioid subtype median survival 17.9 months; patients achieving MCR had median survival of 28.2 months versus 13.1 months for incomplete resection (p < 0.0001)
• Comparative study (2024): 55 patients; HITHOC group (cisplatin 125 mg/m², 70 min, 40–43°C) vs. surgery only; 30-day mortality 0% (HITHOC) versus 3.3% (surgery only)

What Are the Renal Safety Concerns with HITHOC?

Because cisplatin is nephrotoxic, renal safety during HITHOC is closely monitored. A multicenter study of 350 patients found that patients receiving high-dose cisplatin were 2.7 times more likely to suffer renal insufficiency than those receiving low-dose cisplatin (p = 0.006). However, overall rates remained within clinically acceptable ranges. Transient complications from HITHOC (reported in approximately 16% of patients) include atrial fibrillation, renal impairment, and transient hypotension — all of which are typically manageable.

Who Is a Candidate for P/D Surgery?

Patient selection for P/D is determined through a multidisciplinary evaluation that considers pulmonary function, overall health, and disease extent. The decision to proceed with surgery must be made by a multidisciplinary treatment conference consisting of mesothelioma surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, medical oncologists, and palliative care physicians.

What Are the Pulmonary Function Requirements?

Parameter	Threshold	Notes
FEV1	≥ 50% predicted	FEV1 < 50% is an exclusion criterion (per NCT07126509)
DLCO	PPO-DLCO ≥ 50% predicted	PPO-DLCO of 40% identified as best predictor of postoperative respiratory failure
PPO-FEV1 and PPO-DLCO > 60%	No further testing needed	Per ERS/ESTS guidelines — surgery can proceed
PPO values 30–60%	Low-technology exercise testing	If VO₂max > 20 mL/kg/min (or > 75% predicted), surgery can proceed
ECOG Status	0–1	NYHA Functional Class 2B or better for cardiac risk

What Other Criteria Must Be Met?

• Staging: Resectable disease, typically stages I–IIIA per current staging guidelines
• Histology: Epithelioid subtype has the best surgical outcomes; sarcomatoid histology is generally not recommended for surgery
• No uncontrolled intercurrent illness
• No active prior malignancy within 2 years (except curable cancers such as basal cell skin cancer)
• Cardiac assessment: NYHA Functional Classification class 2B or better

What Are the Complication Rates After P/D?

A comprehensive literature review of P/D outcomes across 12 published series (2008–2015) provides detailed complication data. While P/D has lower mortality than EPP, it carries a unique complication profile related to preserving the lung:

Complication	Rate Range	Notes
30-Day Mortality	0.0–6.8%	Most high-volume series report 0–3.4%
Prolonged Air Leak	7.1–23.5%	Most common P/D complication — unique to P/D (not seen in EPP)
Arrhythmia (A-fib/SVT)	2.3–21.4%	Most frequently supraventricular tachycardia
Respiratory Failure	2.3–7.1%	Major complication requiring ventilatory support
Bleeding/Hemorrhage	0.0–16.7%	Varies widely by series
Pneumonia	4.5–25%	Aspiration pneumonia is a major concern
DVT/VTE	4.5–28.6%	Higher rates in some series
Overall Complication Rate	9.0–43.0%	Broad range depending on center experience

How Can Complications Be Reduced?

A 2023 University of Pennsylvania series identified aspiration pneumonia, DVT, and line sepsis as the primary drivers of P/D morbidity and demonstrated that implementing three targeted strategies significantly reduced these complications:

• Early tracheostomy when prolonged intubation is anticipated
• Therapeutic anticoagulation initiated at diagnosis
• Gastrostomy placement to prevent aspiration events

A meta-analysis (2022) confirmed that P/D has significantly lower rates of empyema, atrial fibrillation, hemorrhage, and bronchopleural fistula compared to EPP. However, prolonged air leak remains more common with P/D because the lung-sparing approach leaves raw lung surface exposed. Postoperative empyema, when it occurs, is associated with prolonged length of stay and higher mortality — making strategies to minimize prolonged air leak critical.

What Is the Recovery Timeline After P/D?

Recovery from pleurectomy/decortication follows a staged progression. Individual timelines vary based on the extent of surgery, patient fitness, and whether complications occur:

Phase	Timeline	Key Milestones
ICU Monitoring	Days 1–3	Chest tubes in place; epidural or IV pain management; respiratory function, oxygen saturation, and hemodynamic monitoring
Step-Down Unit	Days 3–7	Transfer from ICU if stable; gradual mobilization; chest tube drainage monitored (removal when < 200–300 mL/day with no air leak)
Pre-Discharge	Weeks 1–2	Most chest tubes removed by days 7–14; prolonged air leak (>5 days) may delay discharge; incentive spirometry begins; hospital discharge at 7–14 days
Early Home Recovery	Weeks 2–6	Gradual increase in walking; avoid lifting >10 lbs; transition to oral pain medications; follow-up chest X-rays at 2 and 6 weeks
Rehabilitation Phase	Weeks 6–12	Return to light daily activities; pulmonary rehabilitation may begin; adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation may start at 4–8 weeks post-surgery
Full Recovery	3–6 months	Gradual return to near-baseline activity; surveillance imaging (CT every 3–6 months); pulmonary function may continue improving up to 6 months

Where Are the High-Volume P/D Centers?

Volume-outcome relationships in mesothelioma surgery are well established — higher-volume centers consistently report lower mortality rates, fewer complications, and better long-term survival. Patients considering P/D should seek evaluation at a center with a dedicated mesothelioma surgical program:

• Memorial Sloan Kettering / Mount Sinai (New York): Dr. Raja Flores — reported a 71-patient P/D series with 0% 30-day mortality and 4.2% 90-day mortality, a benchmark for surgical excellence
• Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston): Historically the home of Dr. David Sugarbaker's EPP program; has shifted toward P/D-based approaches. Now also linked to Baylor College of Medicine
• Royal Brompton Hospital / Imperial College London: Dr. Eric Lim — led the MARS 2 trial, one of the most experienced European mesothelioma surgical programs
• University of Pennsylvania: Dr. Joseph Friedberg — pioneer of photodynamic therapy combined with P/D
• MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston): High-volume thoracic surgery center with a dedicated mesothelioma specialization
• National Cancer Institute (Bethesda): Active mesothelioma surgical program within the NCI clinical center

"Mesothelioma surgery is not a procedure where any thoracic surgeon will do. The difference between a high-volume center and a low-volume one can mean the difference between a 0% and a 9% surgical mortality rate. Patients deserve to know that the surgeon's experience directly impacts their outcome."

— David Foster, Patient Advocate, Danziger & De Llano

What Is the History of Pleurectomy and Decortication?

The evolution of P/D reflects broader trends in surgical oncology toward less radical, organ-preserving approaches:

• 1940s: Surgery to remove the pleural lining (pleurectomy) first described for treatment of pleural disease
• 1960s: Pleurectomy combined with decortication (removal of fibrous tissue from the lung surface) began to appear in the surgical literature
• 1976: Butchart and colleagues described the extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) technique, which became the dominant radical approach for decades
• 1990s–2000s: Growing evidence that P/D achieved comparable survival to EPP with lower morbidity prompted a gradual shift in surgical practice
• 2004: The original MARS feasibility trial raised questions about the benefit of EPP
• 2010s: Multiple retrospective series demonstrated excellent outcomes for P/D at high-volume centers; extended P/D with diaphragm and pericardial reconstruction became more standardized
• 2023: The MARS 2 trial reported that extended P/D was associated with worse survival versus chemotherapy alone, intensifying debate about patient selection and center volume
• Present: The goal has evolved toward macroscopic complete resection (MCR); robotic-assisted techniques are increasingly used for greater precision; the role of perioperative immunotherapy combined with surgery is actively being studied in clinical trials

What Are the Cost and Access Considerations?

P/D is a complex, resource-intensive procedure that requires specialized surgical teams, prolonged hospitalization, and often multimodal adjuvant therapy. Several factors affect patient access:

• Geographic access: High-volume mesothelioma surgical centers are concentrated in a small number of academic medical centers. Many patients must travel significant distances for evaluation and surgery
• Insurance coverage: P/D for mesothelioma is generally covered by Medicare and major insurance plans when deemed medically appropriate by a multidisciplinary team
• Total cost: The combination of surgery, ICU care, 7–14 day hospitalization, and adjuvant therapy represents a substantial total treatment cost, though specific figures vary widely by center and extent of surgery
• Lost wages and caregiver burden: The 3–6 month recovery period affects both patients and their families financially and personally
• Legal compensation: Many mesothelioma patients qualify for compensation through asbestos trust funds, VA benefits (for veterans with service-related exposure), or legal claims that can help offset treatment costs
• Second opinions: Given the controversies highlighted by MARS 2, patients are strongly encouraged to obtain a second surgical opinion from a high-volume center before committing to — or declining — surgery

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy?

Pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) is a lung-sparing surgery that removes the diseased pleural lining and all visible tumor while preserving the underlying lung. Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is a more radical procedure that removes the entire affected lung along with the pleura, diaphragm, and pericardium. P/D achieves 0–3.4% perioperative mortality at high-volume centers compared to historically higher rates for EPP, with lower rates of empyema, atrial fibrillation, and hemorrhage. Most major mesothelioma surgical centers have shifted from EPP to P/D-based approaches over the past two decades.

Does the MARS 2 trial mean patients should avoid P/D surgery?

The MARS 2 trial reported that extended P/D was associated with worse survival compared to chemotherapy alone, but the results are highly debated within the mesothelioma surgical community. The trial recorded a 9% 90-day surgical mortality rate — more than double the 4.2% rate observed in a contemporaneous Mount Sinai series of 71 patients. Many experts argue that MARS 2 demonstrates the importance of selecting high-volume surgical centers rather than abandoning P/D entirely. Patients should seek evaluation at a center with established mesothelioma surgical expertise before making treatment decisions.

What is HITHOC and how does it improve P/D outcomes?

HITHOC (Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy) is a procedure in which heated chemotherapy — typically cisplatin at 40–43°C — is perfused directly into the chest cavity immediately after cytoreductive surgery. A meta-analysis found that HITHOC significantly extended median survival compared to surgery alone, and a 2025 systematic review confirmed that six of seven studies demonstrated a survival benefit. Patients who achieved macroscopic complete resection with HITHOC had median survival of 28.2 months versus 13.1 months for incomplete resection.

Who qualifies as a candidate for P/D surgery?

Candidates must meet pulmonary function thresholds including FEV1 of at least 50% predicted and DLCO of at least 50% predicted, along with ECOG performance status of 0–1. Disease must be resectable, typically staged at I–IIIA. Epithelioid histology offers the best surgical outcomes while sarcomatoid subtype is generally not recommended for surgery. The decision requires evaluation by a multidisciplinary team including mesothelioma surgeons, medical oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists.

What complications are most common after P/D?

Prolonged air leak is the most common complication unique to P/D, occurring in 7.1–23.5% of patients — this complication does not occur after EPP because the lung is removed entirely. Other complications include cardiac arrhythmia (2.3–21.4%), respiratory failure (2.3–7.1%), pneumonia (4.5–25%), and DVT/VTE (4.5–28.6%). Thirty-day mortality ranges from 0.0–6.8% across published series, with most high-volume centers reporting 0–3.4%. Implementing early tracheostomy, therapeutic anticoagulation, and gastrostomy placement has been shown to significantly reduce P/D morbidity.

How long does recovery take after pleurectomy/decortication?

Recovery follows a staged progression: 1–3 days of ICU monitoring, transfer to a step-down unit by days 3–7, hospital discharge at 7–14 days, and full recovery to near-baseline activity at 3–6 months. Chest tubes are typically removed by days 7–14, though prolonged air leak may delay discharge. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation may begin 4–8 weeks after surgery. Pulmonary function may continue improving for up to 6 months post-surgery, a significant advantage of the lung-sparing approach.

Why does surgical center volume matter for P/D outcomes?

Volume-outcome relationships are well established in mesothelioma surgery. High-volume centers consistently report lower mortality, fewer complications, and better long-term survival. The contrast between MARS 2 (9% 90-day mortality across multiple centers) and Mount Sinai (4.2% in a dedicated program) illustrates how surgeon and center experience directly impact patient outcomes. Patients considering P/D should seek evaluation at academic medical centers with dedicated mesothelioma surgical programs such as Memorial Sloan Kettering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, or MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Can P/D be combined with immunotherapy?

The role of perioperative immunotherapy combined with surgery is actively being studied in clinical trials. Current multimodal approaches combine P/D with chemotherapy, radiation, and/or HITHOC. Emerging research is evaluating checkpoint inhibitors before or after cytoreductive surgery to determine whether immunotherapy can further improve outcomes for resectable mesothelioma patients. Patients interested in immunotherapy-surgery combinations should inquire about available clinical trials at high-volume mesothelioma centers.

Get Help

Mesothelioma patients and families can connect with experienced legal and medical advocates:

• Danziger & De Llano provides free case evaluations and can connect families with specialized treatment centers — call (855) 699-5441
• Mesothelioma Lawyer Center offers resources on treatment options and legal rights
• Mesothelioma.net provides comprehensive information on surgical options

Quick Statistics

• Pleurectomy/decortication achieves macroscopic complete resection with 0–3.4% perioperative mortality at experienced centers
• MARS 2 enrolled 335 patients and reported 9% 90-day surgical mortality — more than double the rate at high-volume dedicated programs
• Mount Sinai P/D series demonstrated 0% 30-day mortality and 4.2% 90-day mortality in 71 patients operated between 2015 and 2021
• Patients achieving MCR after P/D with HITHOC survived a median 28.2 months compared to 13.1 months for incomplete resection
• HITHOC meta-analysis showed statistically significant survival prolongation with Hedges' g of 0.384 and recurrence-free interval improvement with Hedges' g of 0.591
• Six of seven studies in a 2025 systematic review demonstrated a survival benefit for HITHOC with zero HITHOC-related deaths reported
• Prolonged air leak — the most common P/D-specific complication — affects 7.1–23.5% of patients and may extend hospital stay beyond the typical 7–14 days
• Overall complication rates after P/D range from 9.0% to 43.0% depending on center volume and surgical experience
• P/D surgical candidacy requires FEV1 and DLCO both at least 50% predicted, with PPO-DLCO of 40% identified as the best predictor of postoperative respiratory failure
• Pulmonary function continues improving for up to 6 months after P/D — a recovery advantage not possible after EPP, which permanently removes the lung

Related Resources

• Mesothelioma Surgery Overview
• Mesothelioma Surgery Recovery
• Heated Chemotherapy (HITHOC and HIPEC)
• Mesothelioma Biopsy Procedures
• Immunotherapy for Mesothelioma
• Mesothelioma Diagnosis and Staging
• Mesothelioma Types
• Treatment Options
• Clinical Trials

Free, Confidential Case Evaluation Call (855) 699-5441 or visit dandell.com/contact-us No upfront fees • Experienced representation • National practice