Longshoremen
Longshoremen and Asbestos Exposure: 800% Higher Lung Disease Risk from Raw Asbestos Cargo and Shipboard Work
Executive Summary
Longshoremen—also known as dock workers, stevedores, and cargo handlers—faced unique asbestos exposure through three distinct pathways: handling raw asbestos fiber cargo arriving at ports, loading and unloading asbestos-containing manufactured products, and working in close proximity to asbestos-laden vessels during cargo operations.[1] Before the 1980s, major U.S. ports including New Orleans, Houston, Baltimore, and New York received millions of pounds of raw chrysotile asbestos imported from Canada, South Africa, and Russia.[2] A South African study documented 30% prevalence of asbestosis among stevedores intermittently transporting crocidolite asbestos—a rate comparable to heavily exposed factory workers.[3] A 1995 study found longshoremen faced an 800% increased risk of chronic lung problems compared to administrative workers.[4] Recent litigation has resulted in substantial verdicts, including a $10.3 million Louisiana award in 2020 to a longshoreman who unloaded raw asbestos bags from 1964-1968. The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) provides federal coverage while preserving third-party liability claims.
Key Facts
| Key Facts: Longshoreman Asbestos Exposure |
|---|
|
What Types of Asbestos Did Longshoremen Encounter?
Longshoremen experienced exposure to asbestos in three primary forms: raw asbestos fiber cargo, asbestos-containing manufactured products in cargo, and asbestos materials aboard vessels during loading/unloading operations.[5]
| Product Type | Asbestos Content | Source/Origin | Peak Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Chrysotile Fiber (Bagged) | 100% pure asbestos | Canadian mines (Quebec), Russian mines (Urals) | 1940s-1980s |
| Crocidolite (Blue Asbestos) | 100% pure asbestos | South African mines (Cape Province) | 1950s-1980s |
| Amosite (Brown Asbestos) | 100% pure asbestos | South African mines (Transvaal) | 1950s-1980s |
| Asbestos-Cement Sheets & Pipes | 10-25% | Various manufacturers | 1940s-1990s |
| Asbestos Textiles & Cloth | Variable, often 100% | Imported from various countries | 1940s-1970s |
| Friction Products (Brakes/Clutches) | 35-70% | Automotive parts in break-bulk cargo | 1940s-1990s |
| Ship's Own Asbestos Materials | 10-50% (insulation), 30-70% (gaskets) | Johns Manville, Owens Corning, Garlock | 1930s-1980s |
| "The longshoremen cases we handle consistently show that workers were exposed through multiple pathways—raw asbestos cargo, manufactured products, and the ships themselves. This triple exposure created cumulative fiber burdens that far exceeded what any single source would produce." |
| — Rod De Llano, Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano |
How Did Raw Asbestos Cargo Expose Longshoremen?
The most direct and severe exposure occurred during the handling of raw asbestos fiber arriving at U.S. ports in burlap bags weighing 50-100 pounds each.[6]
Documented Port Import Volumes
Federal trade records reveal that from 2006 to 2014 alone, 23 U.S. seaports received more than 8.2 million pounds of raw asbestos.[7] The largest receiving ports included:
| Port | Volume (2006-2014) |
|---|---|
| New Orleans, LA | 5,249,103 pounds |
| Houston, TX | 2,400,000+ pounds |
| Newark, NJ | 278,224 pounds |
| Long Beach, CA | 208,333 pounds |
| Mobile, AL | 56,438 pounds |
| Norfolk, VA | 28,219 pounds |
These modern figures pale in comparison to historical volumes. During the peak decades of the 1950s-1970s, millions of tons of raw asbestos entered the United States annually.[8]
The Deadly Reality of Bag Breakage
Raw asbestos was transported in burlap bags stacked in ship's holds. Longshoremen testified in legal proceedings that these bags frequently tore during handling, releasing asbestos dust into the hold.[9]
A Louisiana longshoreman who worked at the Port of New Orleans from 1964-1968 testified that bags would frequently tear, releasing asbestos dust into the ship's hold. Workers were not provided with respiratory protection or warnings about the hazards of the white mineral substance they were unloading.[10]
| ⚠ Critical Exposure Pattern: Burlap bags were not designed for multiple handling episodes. Each transfer—from mine to warehouse to ship to port to rail/truck—increased tear likelihood. Port records from the 1960s-1970s document substantial "breakage and spillage" losses during cargo transfer. |
Physical Process of Unloading
The unloading process created extreme exposure conditions:[11]
- Longshoremen worked in teams within cargo holds
- Workers hooked bags to winch lines for hoisting to deck level
- Manual moving and stacking bags onto pallets or into holds
- Torn bags were re-bagged or fiber was shoveled into containers
- End of shifts: Workers' clothing covered in white dust
- Confined spaces: Ship's holds provided minimal ventilation, allowing airborne fiber concentrations to build to extremely high levels
What Epidemiological Evidence Links Longshoremen to Asbestos Disease?
Multiple studies across different countries document elevated cancer mortality and asbestos disease among longshoremen.[12]
South African Stevedore Study (Most Compelling Evidence)
The most striking epidemiological evidence comes from a cross-sectional survey of stevedores in a South African port who intermittently transported crocidolite (blue asbestos) cargo.[13]
Key Findings:
- Asbestosis prevalence reached 30%—comparable to factory workers with continuous high-level exposure
- This rate is remarkable given the intermittent nature of the exposure
- Suggests that handling raw asbestos fiber, even sporadically, can result in severe pulmonary consequences
- Asbestosis was not associated with tuberculosis
- Smoking was not significantly associated with asbestosis in this cohort
Italian Five-Harbor Study
A comprehensive Italian study of five harbors (Savona, Marina di Carrara, Livorno, Civitavecchia, and Ravenna) established a cohort of longshoremen employed between 1960 and 1981.[14]
Findings:
- Low overall mortality consistent with "healthy worker effect"
- Excess lung cancer found in 4 of 5 harbors studied
- Suggests occupational etiology for elevated cancer rates
U.S. Maritime Health Study
A U.S. maritime occupational health study reported that longshore workers faced an 800% increased risk of developing chronic lung problems compared to administrative workers.[15] Even today, maritime terminals provide dangerous working conditions with occupational exposure leading to pulmonary, autoimmune, and skin diseases as well as cancer.
2017 Dock Worker Cancer Study
A 2017 study examining dock workers found:[16]
- Higher risk of laryngeal cancer
- Elevated neurological disease mortality
- Increased risk of non-accidental, malignant cancer, lung cancer, and respiratory disease mortality
| "The epidemiological evidence we've seen in these cases is compelling. When South African stevedores who only occasionally handled asbestos cargo showed 30% asbestosis rates—the same as full-time factory workers—it demonstrates just how hazardous this work really was." |
| — Paul Danziger, Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano |
How Did Shipboard Proximity Expose Longshoremen?
Even when not directly handling asbestos cargo, longshoremen experienced significant exposure from proximity to vessels during cargo operations.[17]
Working Aboard Asbestos-Contaminated Vessels
Cargo operations required longshoremen to spend entire shifts—typically 8-12 hours—aboard vessels built from the 1930s through 1970s that contained extensive asbestos insulation throughout.[18]
Working in cargo holds meant being surrounded by:
- Asbestos-insulated pipes running through holds
- Bulkheads covered with asbestos panels
- Decks with asbestos-containing tiles
- Deteriorating insulation that continuously shed fibers
Confined Space Hazards
The confined environment of cargo holds, particularly in deep tanks and lower holds, provided poor ventilation.[19] Unlike shipyard workers who could sometimes work in open air, longshoremen loading or unloading cargo in holds had no choice but to work in whatever conditions the ship provided.
Vibration from cargo operations, temperature changes, and physical contact with ship structures disturbed asbestos materials, releasing fibers into the air longshoremen breathed throughout their shifts.[20]
| ℹ Cumulative Exposure Pattern: Unlike workers with single-source exposures (such as brake mechanics primarily exposed to brake dust), longshoremen encountered diverse fiber types from multiple products in various physical forms and exposure scenarios—creating cumulative exposure that exceeded any single source. |
What Port Facilities Exposed Longshoremen to Asbestos?
Port facilities themselves contained extensive asbestos materials, creating additional exposure separate from cargo handling.[21]
Warehouse and Transit Shed Materials
Warehouses built from the 1940s-1970s used asbestos-containing materials throughout:[22]
- Roofing materials (asbestos-cement)
- Siding (asbestos-cement panels)
- Floor tiles (vinyl asbestos)
- Pipe insulation (for sprinkler and heating systems)
Transit sheds where cargo was temporarily stored featured asbestos construction materials throughout.
Fire Protection Requirements
Port buildings required industrial-grade fire protection due to the variety of materials stored:[23]
- Spray-applied fireproofing on structural steel
- Asbestos ceiling tiles
- Asbestos-containing drywall joint compounds
Deterioration of these materials over decades created dust that settled on surfaces and became re-aerosolized through human activity.
What Legal Options Do Longshoremen Have for Compensation?
Longshoremen diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases have multiple legal pathways for pursuing compensation, governed primarily by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA).[24]
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA)
The LHWCA (33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq.) provides federal workers' compensation coverage for longshoremen and other maritime workers.[25]
Key LHWCA Provisions:
- Covers longshoremen, harbor workers, ship repairmen, and other maritime employees
- Provides medical benefits and wage replacement
- No-fault system: Does not require proving employer negligence
- Federal administration through Department of Labor
Section 905(b) Third-Party Claims
While LHWCA provides the exclusive remedy against employers, Section 905(b) preserves third-party claims against vessel owners for negligence.[26]
Longshoremen can sue vessel owners who:
- Failed to warn of known hazards
- Failed to provide safe working conditions aboard vessels
- Allowed deteriorating asbestos insulation to expose workers
| ✓ Legal Advantage: Unlike most workers' compensation systems that completely bar lawsuits, the LHWCA specifically preserves third-party claims against vessel owners—allowing longshoremen to pursue both compensation benefits AND negligence lawsuits. |
Product Manufacturer Claims
Longshoremen can pursue product liability claims against manufacturers of asbestos-containing cargo and materials:[27]
- Raw asbestos suppliers
- Asbestos-cement manufacturers
- Insulation manufacturers (Johns Manville, Owens Corning)
- Gasket and packing manufacturers (Garlock)
What Verdicts and Settlements Have Longshoremen Received?
Longshoremen and their families have pursued successful legal claims resulting in substantial verdicts.[28]
Notable Verdicts
| Verdict Amount | Year | Plaintiff/Port | Key Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.3 Million | 2020 | Louisiana longshoreman / Port of New Orleans | Unloaded raw asbestos bags from 1964-1968; testified bags frequently tore, releasing dust; no respiratory protection or warnings provided[29] |
The $10.3 Million Louisiana Verdict
This landmark 2020 verdict demonstrates the significant liability exposure that remains for asbestos companies decades after exposure occurred.[30]
Case Facts:
- Plaintiff worked at Port of New Orleans from 1964-1968
- Unloaded raw asbestos cargo from vessels
- Testified that burlap bags frequently tore during handling
- Asbestos dust filled the ship's hold
- No respiratory protection provided
- No warnings about hazards of white mineral substance
| "The $10.3 million Louisiana verdict shows that juries understand the profound injustice of what happened to these workers. They were given no warnings, no protection, while companies knew the dangers. That's the pattern we see repeatedly in longshoremen cases." |
| — Rod De Llano, Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano |
What Bankruptcy Trust Funds Are Available to Longshoremen?
Longshoremen with asbestos exposure can file claims with numerous bankruptcy trust funds established by product manufacturers.[31]
Applicable Trust Funds
- Johns Manville Trust (insulation products on vessels and in port facilities)
- Owens Corning/Fibreboard Trust (insulation materials)
- Garlock Sealing Technologies Trust (gaskets and packing on vessels)[32]
- Pittsburgh Corning Trust (insulation products)
- Armstrong World Industries Trust (floor tiles and ceiling materials in port facilities)
- Federal-Mogul/Bendix Trust (brake products in port vehicles and equipment)
- Various shipbuilding company trusts
Documentation Requirements
Trust fund claims require documenting:[33]
- Work at specific ports during specific time periods
- Types of cargo handled (including raw asbestos or asbestos-containing products)
- Work aboard vessels (including vessel names if possible)
- Duration of employment in longshore work
- Medical diagnosis of asbestos disease
Co-worker affidavits proving exposure circumstances significantly strengthen claims.
Who Can Be Held Liable in Longshoremen Asbestos Cases?
Multiple categories of defendants may face liability in longshoremen asbestos claims.[34]
Key Defendant Categories
Stevedoring Companies: Companies that employed longshoremen and contracted with vessel owners may be defendants in LHWCA proceedings. Examples include SSA Marine, Ports America, Cooper T. Smith, and numerous regional stevedoring operations.[35]
Vessel Owners and Operators: Shipping companies that owned vessels where exposure occurred can be sued under Section 905(b) and general maritime law—including both U.S. companies and foreign shipping lines operating vessels that called at U.S. ports.[36]
Port Authorities: In some circumstances, port authorities that owned dock facilities may face premises liability claims if asbestos in port buildings or infrastructure caused exposure.[37]
Product Manufacturers: Companies that manufactured asbestos-containing cargo (raw asbestos suppliers, asbestos-cement manufacturers) may be liable for failure to warn about product hazards.[38]
Are Longshoremen Still at Risk for Asbestos Exposure Today?
Modern longshoremen face substantially reduced asbestos exposure compared to earlier generations, but risks persist.[39]
Ongoing Exposure Risks
Raw Asbestos Imports Continue: Port records from 2006-2014 show over 8 million pounds entered U.S. ports, demonstrating ongoing trade. Workers handling these shipments remain at risk if proper controls are not implemented.[40]
Container Cargo Concerns: Containers arriving from countries that still use asbestos (most of Asia, India, Brazil, Russia) may contain asbestos products. When containers are opened for customs inspection or when damaged containers require handling, longshoremen may encounter asbestos-containing materials without warning.[41]
Port Facility Materials: Port facilities built during the mid-20th century contain asbestos in structures that may not have been fully abated. Deteriorating warehouse insulation, ceiling tiles in transit sheds, and asbestos-cement roofing on older port buildings can release fibers.[42]
| ⚠ Statute of Limitations: Filing deadlines for longshoremen asbestos claims vary based on claim type. LHWCA claims have specific time limits, and third-party lawsuits must be filed within state statute periods. Contact an attorney immediately to protect your rights. |
What Should Longshoremen Diagnosed with Mesothelioma Do?
Longshoremen diagnosed with mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases should take immediate steps to protect their legal rights.[43]
Immediate Action Steps
1. Document Employment History:
- Ports where you worked
- Dates of employment
- Employers (stevedoring companies)
- Union membership records (ILWU, ILA)
2. Identify Exposure Sources:
- Types of cargo handled (especially raw asbestos)
- Vessels worked aboard (names if possible)
- Port facilities worked in
- Co-workers who can provide affidavits
3. Gather Medical Documentation:
- Pathology reports confirming diagnosis
- Imaging studies and treatment records
- Physician opinions on causation
4. Contact Experienced Legal Counsel:
- Evaluate LHWCA benefits
- Assess Section 905(b) vessel owner claims
- Identify manufacturer liability
- File bankruptcy trust fund claims
| "Longshoremen cases require understanding of maritime law, workers' compensation, and product liability all at once. We help families navigate this complexity while working to maximize total compensation from every available source." |
| — David Foster, Client Advocate, Danziger & De Llano |
Get Help Today
|
🛡️ Free Case Evaluation for Longshoremen Longshoremen diagnosed with mesothelioma may be entitled to substantial compensation through LHWCA benefits, vessel owner lawsuits, manufacturer claims, and bankruptcy trust funds. Our attorneys have extensive experience with maritime asbestos cases. Call Today: (866) 222-9990 ✅ Start Your Free Case Review → No fees unless we recover compensation for you |
References
- ↑ Asbestos & Mesothelioma Lawyers | Danziger & DeLlano LLP
- ↑ Asbestos Exposure Lawyers | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Shipyards & Dockyards Explained | Mesothelioma Lawyer Center
- ↑ Mesothelioma Compensation | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Top-Rated Mesothelioma Lawyers | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Jury Awards $10.3M to Longshoreman in Mesothelioma Case
- ↑ Mesothelioma Diagnosis Guide | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Shipyard Workers and Asbestos Exposure | Mesothelioma Risks
- ↑ Mesothelioma Settlements | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Maritime Law Allows Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Case
- ↑ Malignant Mesothelioma Lawyers | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ What's Your Mesothelioma Case Worth? | Danziger & De Llano
- ↑ Asbestos Exposure | Who Is at Risk?
- ↑ How Much Is a Mesothelioma Case Worth?
- ↑ What Is Asbestos? | Asbestos Exposure Risk and Mesothelioma
- ↑ Asbestos Exposure in Ship Repair | Workers at Risk
- ↑ Mesothelioma Risk: Shipyard, Oil & Construction Workers
- ↑ Hunters Point Naval Shipyard | Asbestos Exposure and Lawsuits
- ↑ Port Authority Named in JFK Mesothelioma Lawsuit
- ↑ Houston Mesothelioma Lawyer | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Advocates | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Asbestos Laws & Exposure Regulations | Safety at Work and Home
- ↑ Vessel Owner Liable in Shipyard Mesothelioma Case
- ↑ Texas Mesothelioma Lawyers | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Mesothelioma Trust Funds | Compensation Without a Lawsuit
- ↑ Jury Awards $10.3M to Longshoreman in Mesothelioma Case
- ↑ California Mesothelioma Lawyers | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Mesothelioma Lawyers Florida | Danziger & De Llano
- ↑ Garlock Sealing Technologies | Asbestos Exposure, Lawsuits
- ↑ Mesothelioma Compensation Guide | Payouts & Eligibilit
- ↑ How We Handle Shipyard Mesothelioma Cases | Legal Support
- ↑ Hire a Skilled Mesothelioma Attorney for Legal Support
- ↑ Boston Naval Shipyard and Asbestos | Mesothelioma
- ↑ Mesothelioma Lawyers New York | Danziger & De Llano
- ↑ What Is Asbestos? Health Risks, Exposure & Safety Facts
- ↑ Occupational Asbestos Exposure | Asbestos in the Workplace
- ↑ Veterans & Mesothelioma Claims | Danziger & De Llano LLP
- ↑ Aircraft Carriers | Ships with Asbestos, Veterans Exposed
- ↑ Asbestos Products | Common Materials That Contain Asbestos
- ↑ Advocates | Danziger & De Llano LLP